From: Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>
To: Raphael Lisicki <raphael.lisicki@siemens.com>
Cc: isar-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: expand-on-first-boot and surprising umounts
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 13:15:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221021131539.7b4c66ee@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d932fd08-4b09-95dc-d78f-87f6eff5bf15@siemens.com>
Hi,
we have patches to use systemd-growfs instead of our manual way. They
might just solve your problem. So please give them a try.
[PATCH v5 0/1] expand-on-first-boot: Switch from resize2fs to
systemd-growfs
All that was missing last time was a way to deal with stretch.
And we really should test all that in CI.
Henning
Am Fri, 21 Oct 2022 09:48:14 +0200
schrieb Raphael Lisicki <raphael.lisicki@siemens.com>:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am using a debian bullseye based system and use
> expand-on-first-boot to expand the last partition. It is not the root
> file system but an extra ext4 partition to be mounted under /data.
> The mounting happens after expand-on-first boot has succeeded.
>
> Sometimes, on some builds more often than others, /data gets
> (attempted to be) umounted immediately after being mounted and
> subsequent units will fail.
>
> Removing expand-on-first-boot resolves the issue, so does adding
> "ExecStartPost=/usr/bin/udevadm settle" to expand-on-first-boot but I
> am not sure if this is only a sophisticated way of solving a race
> condition with "sleep".
>
> My gut feeling is that after expand-on-first boot finishes, the kernel
> still processes block device events, which systemd gets after /data
> has already been mounted and then cause it to be umounted, as systemd
> was already picky with umounting stuff in the past [1]. Unfortunately
> I have no idea how to test this hypothesis.
>
> Did anyone already experience something like this? The racy-ness of
> the issue makes creating a minimal reproduction hard.
>
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/9869
>
>
>
> best regards
> raphael
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-21 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-21 7:48 Raphael Lisicki
2022-10-21 8:45 ` Bezdeka, Florian
2022-10-21 9:36 ` Raphael Lisicki
2022-10-21 9:41 ` Bezdeka, Florian
2022-10-21 13:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-10-21 16:38 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-10-27 14:36 ` Raphael Lisicki
2022-10-21 16:24 ` Raphael Lisicki
2022-10-21 11:15 ` Henning Schild [this message]
2022-10-21 15:41 ` Roberto A. Foglietta
2022-10-21 16:15 ` Bezdeka, Florian
2022-10-21 17:35 ` Roberto A. Foglietta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221021131539.7b4c66ee@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net \
--to=henning.schild@siemens.com \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
--cc=raphael.lisicki@siemens.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox