public inbox for isar-users@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "'MOESSBAUER, Felix' via isar-users" <isar-users@googlegroups.com>
To: "isar-users@googlegroups.com" <isar-users@googlegroups.com>,
	"cedric.hombourger@siemens.com" <cedric.hombourger@siemens.com>
Cc: "Arjunan, Srinu" <srinuvasan.a@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rootfs: do not expose /sys/firmware while building root file-systems
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 12:58:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <23351a3bdc42f238a0b8341afd2d3611d5cbca03.camel@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250617123507.2245-1-cedric.hombourger@siemens.com>

On Tue, 2025-06-17 at 14:35 +0200, 'Cedric Hombourger' via isar-users
wrote:
> We need /sys while assembling the target root file-system but it
> exposes
> more than the build really needs. Some maintainer scripts (e.g.
> mdmadm)
> check /sys/firmware/efi/efivars while configuring themselves. This
> would
> normally be fine but for Isar builds, any information extracted from
> there
> is for the host doing the build and not for the target we are
> building for.
> In addition, packages seeing /sys/firmware/efi will mount efivars
> there
> and will cause do_rootfs_umount to fail unmounting /sys (because of
> that
> extra mount). By mounting a (small) tmpfs as /sys/firmware in the
> root
> file-system, we hide host details from the build; that extra mount
> needs
> to be removed before we attempt to unmount /sys (but we are in
> control).

Good catch! Eventually all these mountpoints should be documented as
well.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Cedric Hombourger <cedric.hombourger@siemens.com>
> ---
>  meta/classes/rootfs.bbclass | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/classes/rootfs.bbclass
> b/meta/classes/rootfs.bbclass
> index 5f877962..7b7859b9 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/rootfs.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/rootfs.bbclass
> @@ -48,6 +48,12 @@ rootfs_do_mounts() {
>              mount -o bind,private /sys '${ROOTFSDIR}/sys'
>          mount --make-rslave '${ROOTFSDIR}/sys'
>  
> +        # Mount a tmpfs on /sys/firmware to avoid host contamination
> problems
> +        # (maintainer scripts shouldn't pull host data from there)
> +        if [ -d '${ROOTFSDIR}/sys/firmware' ]; then
> +            mount -t tmpfs -o size=1m,nosuid,nodev none
> '${ROOTFSDIR}/sys/firmware'
> +        fi
> +

Would bubblewrap help in this case? I'm also wondering if we really
should bind-mount the devices from the host or better mknod them in the
chroot.

Anyways, this discussion should not stop the patch from being merged.

Felix

>          # Mount isar-apt if the directory does not exist or if it is
> empty
>          # This prevents overwriting something that was copied there
>          if [ ! -e '${ROOTFSDIR}/isar-apt' ] || \
> @@ -94,6 +100,9 @@ rootfs_do_umounts() {
>          if mountpoint -q '${ROOTFSDIR}/proc'; then
>              umount '${ROOTFSDIR}/proc'
>          fi
> +        if mountpoint -q '${ROOTFSDIR}/sys/firmware'; then
> +            umount '${ROOTFSDIR}/sys/firmware'
> +        fi
>          if mountpoint -q '${ROOTFSDIR}/sys'; then
>              umount '${ROOTFSDIR}/sys'
>          fi
> -- 
> 2.39.5

-- 
Siemens AG
Linux Expert Center
Friedrich-Ludwig-Bauer-Str. 3
85748 Garching, Germany

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "isar-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to isar-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/isar-users/23351a3bdc42f238a0b8341afd2d3611d5cbca03.camel%40siemens.com.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-17 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-17 12:35 'Cedric Hombourger' via isar-users
2025-06-17 12:39 ` Srinuvasan Arjunan
2025-06-17 12:58 ` 'MOESSBAUER, Felix' via isar-users [this message]
2025-06-17 14:26   ` 'Jan Kiszka' via isar-users
2025-06-17 14:48   ` 'cedric.hombourger@siemens.com' via isar-users

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=23351a3bdc42f238a0b8341afd2d3611d5cbca03.camel@siemens.com \
    --to=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=cedric.hombourger@siemens.com \
    --cc=felix.moessbauer@siemens.com \
    --cc=srinuvasan.a@siemens.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox