From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6683827867816558592 X-Received: by 2002:adf:eb0c:: with SMTP id s12mr28315741wrn.229.1556279223539; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 04:47:03 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:adf:8083:: with SMTP id 3ls3851744wrl.9.gmail; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 04:47:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxZVxFYZaA+QAajI8+sSEyITxllV0aQ+HwoHONqG6L36UQqLoB/lNotbbNgq6XQBJAkwn6V X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6103:: with SMTP id v3mr6831660wrt.186.1556279223051; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 04:47:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1556279223; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PJ09cTNL9n7ljGM4BwvCuUyX2A106RB8tzPloISYCFZ6pyOoocm7P2fFs13SZeIPhK 55YwCOXPi8HnbrkasJutoEFi48nNlh6uQe4HfDznkguMGY1dzqOp/45HWO8EM3Ad6DAN rAWb4rc8V/dB8hTu0WgEIgWSPu5vgZh7Wjvm2ta7CFbgtmYES++WXRzmTS7UWFTt9ZkN MBCLED9BRM6Xehp7FS70Vigrz7U5UGQZOI04vTZHdMb3pZ6aCqdoZSpWreqkmDja2M1/ 8akZCmfe1RuvFyLZAwH96SyZkOWL2JSZiR7S2Cpe53cAJFwxUpkhfEBLWFnQ+DH0F3A0 lt4w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=OD/IDRLSrH4Ti7uxRuUM8A4Vmbu+N14KM0jb/0Re3co=; b=UcZ0bqWxLV453fHuipwIZRM20HCCP99ib38OSTb4oC8d7FiQm4mY5gPuSvrn/m0usB GOEV88EyHidJV3knkGXZHBmrptw1bY7K1j1fRwL68gEK3QNYth7+0NSv+UWtTaszvR/e WnksF6yH3yzOx7potGlLry6TOBaAF58QjIplSDergUnzkJ6B/SevAaesH2GVGJxixyT/ cb9IeJh3do3Znv3dK/Elsum20VQuIyNyIMPfNertm6dSmsTB8Yrlzif43q6REMs+dgBN 91cyezfdV/3PYzfAcZObAt7PalpIlDBc559tgNs6bJ8KLW0++UcUmbybMyMnzcy6e2s3 e9mA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.40 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jan.kiszka@siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from gecko.sbs.de (gecko.sbs.de. [194.138.37.40]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4si141724wmd.1.2019.04.26.04.47.02 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Apr 2019 04:47:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.40 as permitted sender) client-ip=194.138.37.40; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.40 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jan.kiszka@siemens.com Received: from mail1.sbs.de (mail1.sbs.de [192.129.41.35]) by gecko.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x3QBl1JJ011450 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:47:01 +0200 Received: from [167.87.22.130] ([167.87.22.130]) by mail1.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x3QBl0qe025966; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:47:01 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] isar-bootstrap-host: disable DISTRO_APT_KEYS usage To: "Maxim Yu. Osipov" , Claudius Heine , claudius.heine.ext@siemens.com Cc: isar-users@googlegroups.com References: <20190425134450.13443-1-claudius.heine.ext@siemens.com> <20190425134450.13443-2-claudius.heine.ext@siemens.com> <155626421155.10914.2537647574220599237@ardipi> <89e6b417-265c-b1a6-b151-0938fed5d462@ilbers.de> <155627516700.10914.10549936123827316965@ardipi> <155627552738.10914.7165832622837260061@ardipi> From: Jan Kiszka Message-ID: <3049e852-9f55-390e-fc40-94d5774ef6e1@siemens.com> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:47:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: wLY4BOSmuY92 On 26.04.19 13:22, Maxim Yu. Osipov wrote: > On 4/26/19 12:45 PM, Claudius Heine wrote: >> Quoting Claudius Heine (2019-04-26 12:39:27) >>> Quoting Maxim Yu. Osipov (2019-04-26 10:41:16) >>>> I need more arguments for introduction of this limitation. >>> >>> Again, that limitation is already present. I don't get why you are >>> often so sure of yourself, especially about code you have not written >>> or worked with intensively. > > I suggest you to choose the correct words before writing such kind of sentences. > I'm not a boy and you are not my mentor. > >> Ok sorry, I take that back. You have written and worked with this code. >> I thought that was written mostly by Alex. > > It doesn't matter if this my code or not. > > I'm quite tired from this offensive style of communication - I consider such > style as misbehavior. I hope that was my last warning to you. > In general, I would appreciate when everyone focuses more again on understanding the issues we still have in code base and tooling, rather then discussing about where they came from, who to blame and who should therefore fix them. And the result needs to be understandable for the core contributors - and ideally not only for them. Of course, if there is evidence that a particular way of working is inefficient, a way of designing is causing problems too often, please make that transparent, with facts. Thanks, Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux