From: Uladzimir Bely <ubely@ilbers.de>
To: isar-users@googlegroups.com
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/12] sbuild: support of shell exports from dpkg_runbuild_prepend
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 21:41:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3317197.LZWGnKmheA@home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e396fe1-889c-8c38-de5d-91274222b955@siemens.com>
In the email from Tuesday, 1 February 2022 21:09:07 +03 user Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 01.02.22 18:00, Uladzimir Bely wrote:
> > Many of recipes often use shell exports done in dpkg_run_prepend, so that
> > this changed environment is used during build.
> >
> > While sbuild is performed in isolated environment, we need a way to
> > pass these variables to it. This is done by storing environment before
> > dpkg_runbuild (after prepare_build) and finding just before the actual
> > build what was changed or added.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uladzimir Bely <ubely@ilbers.de>
> > ---
> >
> > meta/classes/dpkg.bbclass | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/classes/dpkg.bbclass b/meta/classes/dpkg.bbclass
> > index 66db7ec5..c252e9b3 100644
> > --- a/meta/classes/dpkg.bbclass
> > +++ b/meta/classes/dpkg.bbclass
> > @@ -29,12 +29,30 @@ do_install_builddeps[lockfiles] +=
> > "${REPO_ISAR_DIR}/isar.lock">
> > addtask devshell after do_install_builddeps
> >
> > +DPKG_PREBUILD_ENV_FILE="${WORKDIR}/dpkg_prebuild.env"
> > +
> > +do_prepare_build_append() {
> > + env > ${DPKG_PREBUILD_ENV_FILE}
> > +}
> > +
> >
> > # Build package from sources using build script
> > dpkg_runbuild() {
> >
> > E="${@ isar_export_proxies(d)}"
> > E="${@ isar_export_ccache(d)}"
> > export PARALLEL_MAKE="${PARALLEL_MAKE}"
> >
> > + env | while read -r line; do
> > + # Filter the same lines
> > + grep -q "^${line}" ${DPKG_PREBUILD_ENV_FILE} && continue
> > + # Filter some standard variables
> > + echo ${line} | grep -q "^HOME=" && continue
> > + echo ${line} | grep -q "^PWD=" && continue
> > +
> > + var=$(echo "${line}" | cut -d '=' -f1)
> > + value=$(echo "${line}" | cut -d '=' -f2-)
> > + sbuild_export $var "$value"
> > + done
> > +
> >
> > profiles=$(grep "DEB_BUILD_PROFILES" ${SBUILD_CONFIG} | tail -n1 |
> > cut -d "'" -f 4) if [ ${ISAR_CROSS_COMPILE} -eq 1 ]; then
> >
> > profiles="${profiles} cross nocheck"
>
> So, this basically decouples "Avoid using shell environment during the
> build" and similar conversions downstream from this series, right? It's
> indeed good to have a compat path now.
>
> However, what are the patterns we want to push? Avoiding exports? Then
> we should probably warn here that this compat path should be avoided and
> might be removed in the future.
>
> If we want to keep both, we can probably leave several recipes alone in
> that other series.
>
> Jan
You might be right. Current solution doesn't force users to avoid using
exports while they are silently supported.
The first internal solution was keeping dpkg_build_export function but also
passing custom shell exports (from dpkg_runbuild_prepend) to sbuild
environment. And a warning about migration was shown.
Later I removed this to make new patchset less invasive for downstreams.
Anyway, if we agree that "dpkg_build_export" (like API function) is more
preferable, I can get back this solution with warnings.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-01 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-01 17:00 [PATCH v5 00/12] Sbuild/Schroot migration Uladzimir Bely
2022-02-01 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] dpkg-gbp: Use separate command to export tarball Uladzimir Bely
2022-02-01 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] dpkg-gbp: Use host tools for dsc preparation Uladzimir Bely
2022-02-01 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] sbuild: Add recipes for host and target rootfs to run sbuild Uladzimir Bely
2022-02-01 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] sbuild: Introduce a class for another build method Uladzimir Bely
2022-02-01 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] dpkg: Build packages with sbuild Uladzimir Bely
2022-02-01 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] sbuild: support of DEB_BUILD_PROFILES Uladzimir Bely
2022-02-01 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] sbuild: support of shell exports from dpkg_runbuild_prepend Uladzimir Bely
2022-02-01 18:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-02-01 18:41 ` Uladzimir Bely [this message]
2022-02-02 6:57 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-02-02 8:46 ` Moessbauer, Felix
2022-02-02 8:52 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-02-02 9:13 ` Uladzimir Bely
2022-02-02 9:46 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-02-01 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] dpkg: Remove builddeps install task Uladzimir Bely
2022-02-01 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] sbuild: add ccache support Uladzimir Bely
2022-02-01 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] dpkg-base: Switch devshell to use schroot Uladzimir Bely
2022-02-01 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] dpkg-base: Switch apt_fetch and apt_unpack " Uladzimir Bely
2022-02-01 17:00 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] doc: Add sbuild-related documentation Uladzimir Bely
2022-02-01 18:14 ` [PATCH v5 00/12] Sbuild/Schroot migration Jan Kiszka
2022-02-01 18:33 ` Uladzimir Bely
2022-02-02 7:01 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3317197.LZWGnKmheA@home \
--to=ubely@ilbers.de \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox