From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6785506002995249152 X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b04d:: with SMTP id d13mr11544406ljl.278.1586159485799; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 00:51:25 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:ac2:42c4:: with SMTP id n4ls1146747lfl.1.gmail; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 00:51:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJfmL1Ag8v7cmzuQxmomDGm97t0PPp5ymW4ArIRt1Nl1bIZBijtu6JYPGuVgCPpcqsDYNsf X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:51c:: with SMTP id o28mr12630259lfb.116.1586159485043; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 00:51:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1586159485; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Yfz9FHY3qn2wEDB6CNLqa1swxvzKo8DrydpHqlYo2UPFBZSWXZcg7tK4GgK98wIqZL bsXyUsNhU03uEtxGatm+c41X3JiABFwWTzvO47QfB6GZAAsfQ/lg6dELe0jur5tL2tcL gj+YQGa3tPWcKmVgBIPQ3OspD6ttm3PSRa5B6i8BD1QNmms4rMFMTkkA2N82Ka42/jmY 3EqidE1iH611kw6bXgjqo6PDgSuA2aHz8dKp0zF+9192TxJbTPw7TGf1EISohkvCoLrw mKarvPG4ShgYoxmokrmhdqkE0V0FZQgBqQ7YiCf37UH5WuajHI0xXQi8TsI8MjtZ2PJf Sa0A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=tUh/TteUXyy2C/eL/2uibZi6eujPc4VfxGCyrslIj2Q=; b=WW4p3YlcgY7ZkSj1TWfTySElvVwl+ML9nyb8vROJnvEp5YqpGTTxGULHNizpvcS+AF SXmbFHE7IxgzD/BN38P+tg1+mAfUMlhZ6vfhEC/Pf7uhR7VRLMxOSQcYbN+uIbD4u9Y+ cjXy0fvlNtML95jVYdW3AeL9EdqkFeqYpTvyW2YHM/1/F97EMty7ZuxCbLmcnUJJ28v/ rWaY7sD/Xv4ewFEj0VCpe+iXlzSbZjR52U5EBxjbHzdLSRjQ43kTVN7vq0NVh6q0JHCk MBTEs5DfPI95uxQSti5b0uCl6XXBEpIccXEszupJxctoV2PwgBQ5qV+c/OfRyPl1lUWf X+EQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.39 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jan.kiszka@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from lizzard.sbs.de (lizzard.sbs.de. [194.138.37.39]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p5si878618ljj.3.2020.04.06.00.51.24 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Apr 2020 00:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.39 as permitted sender) client-ip=194.138.37.39; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.39 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jan.kiszka@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: from mail2.sbs.de (mail2.sbs.de [192.129.41.66]) by lizzard.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0367pOUv031042 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:51:24 +0200 Received: from [167.87.90.167] ([167.87.90.167]) by mail2.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0367pNJG005784; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:51:23 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/oe/path: try hardlinking instead of guessing when it might fail To: Henning Schild , Baurzhan Ismagulov Cc: isar-users@googlegroups.com References: <20200124134847.5052-1-henning.schild@siemens.com> <20200124145100.3188783f@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> <20200405165815.fntsl23lkmwi7rxe@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <20200406094225.68e598ac@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> From: Jan Kiszka Message-ID: <345b97fd-c9ee-e4de-2251-1861cb05a311@siemens.com> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:51:23 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200406094225.68e598ac@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: 8toZ21qh3pBu On 06.04.20 09:42, Henning Schild wrote: > On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 18:58:16 +0200 > Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote: > >> Hello Henning, >> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 02:51:00PM +0100, Henning Schild wrote: >>> This is related to fixing an issue with "--exclude-path" in wic. On >>> the Isar side i have everything in place and might send it. But we >>> need that upstream fix ... or some workaround if that does not get >>> merged. >> >> Do I understand correctly, you'd be providing a lib/oe update for >> Isar along with the other necessary changes? A test case for >> --exclude-path would be nice. > > The test-case is already somewhere in a branch of mine ;). The problem > now is that this upstream fix need to come down into Isar. > > But i am afraid that our lib/oe is a fork, miles away from upstream. We are fairly close, picking patches from upstream is often possible when we aren't. I just did that not long ago (9813e9e821cb2c4f0ea66544e35030fa261f1a47). Some bits may have to remain different sometimes, though. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux