From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: "MOESSBAUER, Felix (T CED INW-CN)" <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>,
"isar-users@googlegroups.com" <isar-users@googlegroups.com>
Cc: "Bezdeka, Florian (T CED SES-DE)" <florian.bezdeka@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] use builtin DT for nanopi-neo target
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 09:01:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37dd3594-f936-4e6d-8cc9-80095b556148@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <399906e0f421a4105488efdd5b1e7cf13855e536.camel@siemens.com>
On 31.08.23 07:34, MOESSBAUER, Felix (T CED INW-CN) wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-08-08 at 10:48 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 01.08.23 11:37, Felix Moessbauer wrote:
>>> The upstream kernel still misses the __symbol__ information in the
>>> device tree. By that, overlays cannot be applied (DT was compiled
>>> without -@). However, all u-boot internal device trees are compiled
>>> with
>>> symbol information. By that, just use the one from u-boot.
>>> Note, that the mmclbk entry changed in this device tree (mmclbk2
>>> instead of mmclbk0). This change is reflected in the wks file. An
>>> alternative option would be to use --use-uuid.
>>>
>>
>> I assume you actually booted with that modification, right? Did you
>> check if there are no other differences between the two DTs? They can
>> be
>> subtle as U-Boot is not yet consistently syncing in the kernel DTs
>> for
>> all boards.
>
> I booted the board with an MTDA image [1] which uses a lot of the
> peripherals of that board. However, I did not do a 1:1 comparison of
> the device tree from u-boot and the kernel.
If all major features of the board still work (networking, storage,
other I/O) and this board is actually looked after in U-Boot as Andre
suggested, then we are good. I was just asking based on past negative
experiences I made.
Jan
>
> The idea to use the DT from u-boot is based on
>
> 1. A kernel developer proposed this in [2]
> 2. It showcases the added (but now reverted) builtin_dt=yes support
>
> In addition, the kernel DT from the stock debian kernel currently
> cannot be used, as this does not support overlays (not compiled with
> symbol information). Back then, it was unclear if the corresponding
> kernel patch to compile with -@ will be accepted and by that this was
> the only feasible solution. Now, the patch from [2] got accepted, but
> there is still no release of the bookworm-backports kernel that
> includes it.
>
> [1] https://github.com/siemens/mtda
> [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg622846.html
>
> Best regards,
> Felix
>
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Felix Moessbauer <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>
>>> ---
>>> meta-isar/scripts/lib/wic/canned-wks/nanopi-neo.wks.in | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meta-isar/scripts/lib/wic/canned-wks/nanopi-neo.wks.in
>>> b/meta-isar/scripts/lib/wic/canned-wks/nanopi-neo.wks.in
>>> index de1c92c4..af5b6f08 100644
>>> --- a/meta-isar/scripts/lib/wic/canned-wks/nanopi-neo.wks.in
>>> +++ b/meta-isar/scripts/lib/wic/canned-wks/nanopi-neo.wks.in
>>> @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
>>> #
>>> -# Copyright (c) Siemens AG, 2018
>>> +# Copyright (c) Siemens AG, 2018-2023
>>> #
>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
>>>
>>> part u-boot --source rawcopy --sourceparams "file=/usr/lib/u-
>>> boot/nanopi_neo/u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin" --no-table --align 8
>>>
>>> -part / --source rootfs-u-boot --ondisk mmcblk0 --fstype ext4 --
>>> mkfs-extraopts "-T default" --label platform --align 1024 --active
>>> +part / --source rootfs-u-boot --ondisk mmcblk2 --fstype ext4 --
>>> mkfs-extraopts "-T default" --sourceparams "builtin_dt=yes" --label
>>> platform --align 1024 --active
>>>
>>> bootloader --append "rw rootwait"
>>
>
--
Siemens AG, Technology
Linux Expert Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-31 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-01 9:37 [PATCH 0/4] Rework and extend u-boot-script for DT overlays Felix Moessbauer
2023-08-01 9:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] fix(u-boot-script): use correct ramdisk size Felix Moessbauer
2023-08-03 10:22 ` Gylstorff Quirin
2023-08-01 9:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] refactor loading of DT overlays in uboot Felix Moessbauer
2023-08-08 8:48 ` Jan Kiszka
2023-08-31 4:56 ` MOESSBAUER, Felix
2023-08-01 9:37 ` [PATCH 3/4] u-boot-script: add support to use builtin dt Felix Moessbauer
2023-08-01 9:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] use builtin DT for nanopi-neo target Felix Moessbauer
2023-08-08 8:48 ` Jan Kiszka
2023-08-31 5:34 ` MOESSBAUER, Felix
2023-08-31 7:01 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2023-08-31 7:07 ` MOESSBAUER, Felix
2023-08-08 7:05 ` [PATCH 0/4] Rework and extend u-boot-script for DT overlays Uladzimir Bely
2023-08-08 10:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2023-08-09 5:40 ` Uladzimir Bely
2023-08-09 7:43 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=37dd3594-f936-4e6d-8cc9-80095b556148@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=felix.moessbauer@siemens.com \
--cc=florian.bezdeka@siemens.com \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox