From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: "Moessbauer, Felix (T CED INW-CN)" <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>,
"Schaffner, Tobias (T CED SES-DE)" <tobias.schaffner@siemens.com>,
"isar-users@googlegroups.com" <isar-users@googlegroups.com>,
"Schild, Henning (T CED SES-DE)" <henning.schild@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: expand-on-first-boot failure
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 08:36:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38b26c00-9d20-3557-5bbd-b52f45e5bc83@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <151b0bec5767bf7064848585f206864ecf306f45.camel@siemens.com>
On 05.12.22 02:06, Moessbauer, Felix (T CED INW-CN) wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 17:35 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> this is with current master:
>>
>> Aug 07 13:25:35 iot2050-debian systemd[1]: Starting Expand last
>> partition...
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: GPT
>> PMBR size mismatch (5407157 != 33554431) will be corrected by write.
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: The
>> backup GPT table is not on the end of the device. This problem will
>> be corrected by write.
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
>> Checking that no-one is using this disk right now ... FAILED
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: This
>> disk is currently in use - repartitioning is probably a bad idea.
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: Umount
>> all file systems, and swapoff all swap partitions on this disk.
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: Use the
>> --no-reread flag to suppress this check.
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: Disk
>> /dev/sda: 16 GiB, 17179869184 bytes, 33554432 sectors
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: Disk
>> model: File-Stor Gadget
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: Units:
>> sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: Sector
>> size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: I/O
>> size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
>> Disklabel type: gpt
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: Disk
>> identifier: 69D3FE47-A859-42D9-B04E-D26BFE6121C6
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: Old
>> situation:
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
>> Device Start End Sectors Size Type
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
>> /dev/sda1 2048 5407123 5405076 2.6G Linux filesystem
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: >>>
>> Script header accepted.
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: >>>
>> Script header accepted.
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: >>>
>> Script header accepted.
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: >>>
>> Script header accepted.
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: >>>
>> Script header accepted.
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: >>>
>> Script header accepted.
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: >>>
>> Created a new GPT disklabel (GUID: 69D3FE47-A859-42D9-B04E-
>> D26BFE6121C6).
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
>> /dev/sda1: Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux filesystem' and
>> of size 16 GiB.
>> Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
>> Partition #1 contains a ext4 signature.
>> Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
>> /dev/sda2: Done.
>> Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: New
>> situation:
>> Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
>> Disklabel type: gpt
>> Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: Disk
>> identifier: 69D3FE47-A859-42D9-B04E-D26BFE6121C6
>> Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
>> Device Start End Sectors Size Type
>> Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
>> /dev/sda1 2048 33554398 33552351 16G Linux filesystem
>> Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: The
>> partition table has been altered.
>> Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: Calling
>> ioctl() to re-read partition table.
>> Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: Re-
>> reading the partition table failed.: Device or resource busy
>> Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: The
>> kernel still uses the old table. The new table will be used at the
>> next reboot or after you run partprobe(8) or partx(8).
>> Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: Syncing
>> disks.
>> Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian systemd-growfs[296]: Failed to open
>> "/dev/block/8:1": No such file or directory
>> Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian systemd[1]: expand-on-first-
>> boot.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
>> Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian systemd[1]: expand-on-first-
>> boot.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
>> Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian systemd[1]: Failed to start Expand
>> last partition.
>>
>> Is the downstream layer lacking something to make things work again?
>> Or
>> is the slow, emulated storage device triggering a bug in the new
>> script?
>
> Hi, I recently discovered the same problem on an IoT2050.
> I'm really asking my self if we should continue with our own
> implementation of expand-on-first-boot. We almost always had bugs in
> this recipe which shows that this is definitely not something trivial.
> But it is still a critical part of the infrastructure.
>
> IIRC the only reason for not using systemd-repart was the lack of
> backward compatibility for Debian stretch. Why not simply split the
> recipe into the old version for old distros and systemd-repart for new
> ones.
It was more complicated than that, see the discussion around it.
First of all, we quickly need to restore to the working state now - or
fix this new issue.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Technology
Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-05 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-04 16:35 Jan Kiszka
2022-12-05 1:06 ` Moessbauer, Felix
2022-12-05 7:36 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2022-12-08 15:37 ` Henning Schild
2022-12-08 15:35 ` Henning Schild
2022-12-09 3:10 ` Moessbauer, Felix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38b26c00-9d20-3557-5bbd-b52f45e5bc83@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=felix.moessbauer@siemens.com \
--cc=henning.schild@siemens.com \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tobias.schaffner@siemens.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox