* [PATCH v1 0/1] Set hash-seed for empty ext partition
@ 2024-06-25 6:50 Adithya Balakumar
2024-06-25 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] wic/partition.py: Set hash_seed " Adithya Balakumar
2024-06-25 7:37 ` [PATCH v1 0/1] Set hash-seed " Jan Kiszka
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Adithya Balakumar @ 2024-06-25 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: isar-users, amikan
Cc: jan.kiszka, kazuhiro3.hayashi, dinesh.kumar, shivanand.kunijadar,
sai.sathujoda, adithya.balakumar
ext filesystems require a hash_seed to generate deterministic directory
indexes for reproducible builds. This is handled by wic in the case where
the rootfs plugin is used but this not handled in the case when an empty
ext4 partition is deployed.
This patch is also shared with openembedded-core and also accepted.
Upstream commit: 0202fb594fb05098cb8d8b6088e63beb40b5906e
Adithya Balakumar (1):
wic/partition.py: Set hash_seed for empty ext partition
scripts/lib/wic/partition.py | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 1/1] wic/partition.py: Set hash_seed for empty ext partition
2024-06-25 6:50 [PATCH v1 0/1] Set hash-seed for empty ext partition Adithya Balakumar
@ 2024-06-25 6:50 ` Adithya Balakumar
2024-06-25 7:37 ` [PATCH v1 0/1] Set hash-seed " Jan Kiszka
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Adithya Balakumar @ 2024-06-25 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: isar-users, amikan
Cc: Adithya Balakumar, jan.kiszka, kazuhiro3.hayashi, dinesh.kumar,
shivanand.kunijadar, sai.sathujoda
From: Adithya Balakumar <adithya.balakumar@toshiba-tsip.com>
Although setting hash_seed is handled for the rootfs plugin case, but
this is missed when deploying an empty ext partition.
Signed-off-by: Adithya Balakumar <adithya.balakumar@toshiba-tsip.com>
---
scripts/lib/wic/partition.py | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/lib/wic/partition.py b/scripts/lib/wic/partition.py
index 795707ec..bf2c34d5 100644
--- a/scripts/lib/wic/partition.py
+++ b/scripts/lib/wic/partition.py
@@ -284,19 +284,8 @@ class Partition():
extraopts = self.mkfs_extraopts or "-F -i 8192"
- if os.getenv('SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH'):
- sde_time = int(os.getenv('SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH'))
- if pseudo:
- pseudo = "export E2FSPROGS_FAKE_TIME=%s;%s " % (sde_time, pseudo)
- else:
- pseudo = "export E2FSPROGS_FAKE_TIME=%s; " % sde_time
-
- # Set hash_seed to generate deterministic directory indexes
- namespace = uuid.UUID("e7429877-e7b3-4a68-a5c9-2f2fdf33d460")
- if self.fsuuid:
- namespace = uuid.UUID(self.fsuuid)
- hash_seed = str(uuid.uuid5(namespace, str(sde_time)))
- extraopts += " -E hash_seed=%s" % hash_seed
+ # use hash_seed to generate reproducible ext4 images
+ (extraopts, pseudo) = self.get_hash_seed_ext4(extraopts, pseudo)
label_str = ""
if self.label:
@@ -344,6 +333,23 @@ class Partition():
self.check_for_Y2038_problem(rootfs, native_sysroot)
+ def get_hash_seed_ext4(self, extraopts, pseudo):
+ if os.getenv('SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH'):
+ sde_time = int(os.getenv('SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH'))
+ if pseudo:
+ pseudo = "export E2FSPROGS_FAKE_TIME=%s;%s " % (sde_time, pseudo)
+ else:
+ pseudo = "export E2FSPROGS_FAKE_TIME=%s; " % sde_time
+
+ # Set hash_seed to generate deterministic directory indexes
+ namespace = uuid.UUID("e7429877-e7b3-4a68-a5c9-2f2fdf33d460")
+ if self.fsuuid:
+ namespace = uuid.UUID(self.fsuuid)
+ hash_seed = str(uuid.uuid5(namespace, str(sde_time)))
+ extraopts += " -E hash_seed=%s" % hash_seed
+
+ return (extraopts, pseudo)
+
def prepare_rootfs_btrfs(self, rootfs, cr_workdir, oe_builddir, rootfs_dir,
native_sysroot, pseudo):
"""
@@ -437,13 +443,16 @@ class Partition():
extraopts = self.mkfs_extraopts or "-i 8192"
+ # use hash_seed to generate reproducible ext4 images
+ (extraopts, pseudo) = self.get_hash_seed_ext4(extraopts, None)
+
label_str = ""
if self.label:
label_str = "-L %s" % self.label
mkfs_cmd = "mkfs.%s -F %s %s -U %s %s" % \
(self.fstype, extraopts, label_str, self.fsuuid, rootfs)
- exec_native_cmd(mkfs_cmd, native_sysroot)
+ exec_native_cmd(mkfs_cmd, native_sysroot, pseudo=pseudo)
self.check_for_Y2038_problem(rootfs, native_sysroot)
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] Set hash-seed for empty ext partition
2024-06-25 6:50 [PATCH v1 0/1] Set hash-seed for empty ext partition Adithya Balakumar
2024-06-25 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] wic/partition.py: Set hash_seed " Adithya Balakumar
@ 2024-06-25 7:37 ` Jan Kiszka
2024-06-25 13:09 ` Anton Mikanovich
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2024-06-25 7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adithya Balakumar, isar-users, amikan
Cc: kazuhiro3.hayashi, dinesh.kumar, shivanand.kunijadar, sai.sathujoda
On 25.06.24 08:50, Adithya Balakumar wrote:
> ext filesystems require a hash_seed to generate deterministic directory
> indexes for reproducible builds. This is handled by wic in the case where
> the rootfs plugin is used but this not handled in the case when an empty
> ext4 partition is deployed.
>
> This patch is also shared with openembedded-core and also accepted.
> Upstream commit: 0202fb594fb05098cb8d8b6088e63beb40b5906e
>
> Adithya Balakumar (1):
> wic/partition.py: Set hash_seed for empty ext partition
>
> scripts/lib/wic/partition.py | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
Shouldn't we sync to a wic revision >= the one containing this?
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Technology
Linux Expert Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] Set hash-seed for empty ext partition
2024-06-25 7:37 ` [PATCH v1 0/1] Set hash-seed " Jan Kiszka
@ 2024-06-25 13:09 ` Anton Mikanovich
2024-06-25 14:30 ` Jan Kiszka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Anton Mikanovich @ 2024-06-25 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kiszka, Adithya Balakumar, isar-users
Cc: kazuhiro3.hayashi, dinesh.kumar, shivanand.kunijadar, sai.sathujoda
25/06/2024 10:37, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Shouldn't we sync to a wic revision >= the one containing this?
>
> Jan
>
Hello Jan,
This is our preferred process by default, but this commit is in oe-core
master
branch only for now. We should probably wait for release or backporting.
We are currently using the latest Scarthgap LTS version 5.0 branch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] Set hash-seed for empty ext partition
2024-06-25 13:09 ` Anton Mikanovich
@ 2024-06-25 14:30 ` Jan Kiszka
2024-06-26 4:35 ` Adithya.Balakumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2024-06-25 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anton Mikanovich, Adithya Balakumar, isar-users
Cc: kazuhiro3.hayashi, dinesh.kumar, shivanand.kunijadar, sai.sathujoda
On 25.06.24 15:09, Anton Mikanovich wrote:
> 25/06/2024 10:37, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Shouldn't we sync to a wic revision >= the one containing this?
>>
>> Jan
>>
> Hello Jan,
>
> This is our preferred process by default, but this commit is in oe-core
> master
> branch only for now. We should probably wait for release or backporting.
>
> We are currently using the latest Scarthgap LTS version 5.0 branch.
>
Maybe propose the commit for 5.0-LTS branch and then sync that in? But
if you are fine with taking this backport, I will not hold you back. It
will be valuable for us, that is for sure.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Technology
Linux Expert Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH v1 0/1] Set hash-seed for empty ext partition
2024-06-25 14:30 ` Jan Kiszka
@ 2024-06-26 4:35 ` Adithya.Balakumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Adithya.Balakumar @ 2024-06-26 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jan.kiszka, amikan, isar-users
Cc: kazuhiro3.hayashi, dinesh.kumar, Shivanand.Kunijadar, Sai.Sathujoda
Hi Anton and Jan,
Thanks for the feedback. Let me propose this patch to Scarthgap also. And once accepted in Scarthgap, I will share the patch with isar again.
Thanks,
Adithya
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 8:00 PM
To: Anton Mikanovich <amikan@ilbers.de>; balakumar adithya(TSIP TEUR) <Adithya.Balakumar@toshiba-tsip.com>; isar-users@googlegroups.com
Cc: hayashi kazuhiro(林 和宏 DME ○DIG□MPS○MP4) <kazuhiro3.hayashi@toshiba.co.jp>; dinesh kumar(TSIP TMIEC ODG Porting) <dinesh.kumar@toshiba-tsip.com>; kunijadar shivanand(TSIP TMIEC ODG Porting) <Shivanand.Kunijadar@toshiba-tsip.com>; ashrith sai(TSIP) <Sai.Sathujoda@toshiba-tsip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] Set hash-seed for empty ext partition
On 25.06.24 15:09, Anton Mikanovich wrote:
> 25/06/2024 10:37, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Shouldn't we sync to a wic revision >= the one containing this?
>>
>> Jan
>>
> Hello Jan,
>
> This is our preferred process by default, but this commit is in
> oe-core master branch only for now. We should probably wait for
> release or backporting.
>
> We are currently using the latest Scarthgap LTS version 5.0 branch.
>
Maybe propose the commit for 5.0-LTS branch and then sync that in? But if you are fine with taking this backport, I will not hold you back. It will be valuable for us, that is for sure.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Technology
Linux Expert Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-26 4:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-06-25 6:50 [PATCH v1 0/1] Set hash-seed for empty ext partition Adithya Balakumar
2024-06-25 6:50 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] wic/partition.py: Set hash_seed " Adithya Balakumar
2024-06-25 7:37 ` [PATCH v1 0/1] Set hash-seed " Jan Kiszka
2024-06-25 13:09 ` Anton Mikanovich
2024-06-25 14:30 ` Jan Kiszka
2024-06-26 4:35 ` Adithya.Balakumar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox