From: Alexander Smirnov <asmirnov@ilbers.de>
To: Claudius Heine <claudius.heine.ext@siemens.com>
Cc: isar-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Isar build tree structure
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 12:13:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44061e32-aa48-b432-ead5-5d6627b707b4@ilbers.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b9b891a-055a-2e4f-60ba-dc87972769d9@siemens.com>
On 09/05/2017 12:06 PM, Claudius Heine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/05/2017 10:21 AM, Alexander Smirnov wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to discuss build folders tree to somehow chose more suitable
>> approach.
>>
>> 1. How it's done at the moment.
>>
>> The folder tree contains the following main paths:
>>
>> - tmp/work/${PP}
>>
>> It's a $WORKDIR for each recipe, here is stored bibtbake logs and
>> commands, and data for packages that doesn't require buildchroot (for
>> example, buildchroot and isar-image-base).
>>
>> - tmp/work/buildchroot/${DISTRO}-${ARCH}/rootfs/home/build/${PN}
>>
>> This is the $BUILDROOT for packages, that require compilation in
>> chroot. It is used as destination folder for unpack task.
>>
>> Benefits:
>>
>> - Maximal common OE-like folder structure for all kind of recipes.
>> You can find the information about specific package in
>> 'tmp/work/${PP}'. And it doesn't matter if this package uses dpkg
>> class, or not.
>>
>> - After buildchroot cleanup, the build information is not loosed.
>>
>> - For multiple buildchroots in project, there will be single place
>> for package meta information.
>>
>> 2. Remove $BUILDROOT.
>>
>> This would mean that $WORKDIR location may vary depending on recipe
>> type. So the recipes data will be distributed across buildchroots and
>> tmp/work dir.
>>
>> Benefits:
>>
>> - Each recipe will use single folder for everything.
>>
>>
>>
>> So... Ideas and opinions? :-)
>>
>
> Why not both benefits? Using bind mount to put the workdir of recipes
> into the buildchroot?
Mount is very difficult to manage. For example if something failed
during build, it's hard to check in next build what is already mounted
and what is not yet.
But your idea is good. Could we use symlinks instead?
>
> Maybe we should take a look at proot [1] and use this instead of chroot,
> because its more flexible, does not require privileges, etc.
>
> [1] https://github.com/proot-me/PRoot/blob/master/doc/proot/manual.txt
>
Do you know if it fully supports dpkg & Co?
--
With best regards,
Alexander Smirnov
ilbers GmbH
Baierbrunner Str. 28c
D-81379 Munich
+49 (89) 122 67 24-0
http://ilbers.de/
Commercial register Munich, HRB 214197
General manager: Baurzhan Ismagulov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-05 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-05 8:21 Alexander Smirnov
2017-09-05 9:06 ` Claudius Heine
2017-09-05 9:13 ` Alexander Smirnov [this message]
2017-09-05 9:28 ` Claudius Heine
2017-09-05 9:35 ` Alexander Smirnov
2017-09-05 11:09 ` Claudius Heine
2017-09-06 14:17 ` Claudius Heine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44061e32-aa48-b432-ead5-5d6627b707b4@ilbers.de \
--to=asmirnov@ilbers.de \
--cc=claudius.heine.ext@siemens.com \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox