public inbox for isar-users@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Adriaan Schmidt <adriaan.schmidt@siemens.com>,
	isar-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] meta: add mounts class
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:31:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <451a6c60-63a1-fdc6-58d6-e8ce4475dbbb@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211012130413.1719424-5-adriaan.schmidt@siemens.com>

On 12.10.21 15:04, Adriaan Schmidt wrote:
> The new mounts.bbclass allows annotation of tasks, to describe which directories
> need to be mounted. All mounting and unmounting is then done automatically,
> and reference counting is used on a per-mountpoint basis to determine when
> umounts need to happen.
> 
> Mounts are described as "cmd:src:dest", where cmd is
>   * `bind` for a simple bind mount
>   * `rbind` for a recursive bind mount
>   * `pbind` for a "private" bind mount
>   * `proc` for a "-t proc" mount
> 
> A task is annotated using the varflag [mounts].
> 
> If mounting should not happen automatically before/after the task, you can set
> do_task[mounts-noauto] = "1", in which case you can manually call
> `mount_task_prefunc` and `mount_task_postfunc` at more convenient times.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adriaan Schmidt <adriaan.schmidt@siemens.com>
> ---
>  meta/classes/mounts.bbclass | 271 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  meta/conf/bitbake.conf      |   2 +-
>  2 files changed, 272 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 meta/classes/mounts.bbclass
> 
> diff --git a/meta/classes/mounts.bbclass b/meta/classes/mounts.bbclass
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..de2375e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/classes/mounts.bbclass
> @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
> +
> +python () {
> +    # find all tasks that request [mounts], and hook up our functions
> +    for task in [t for t in d.keys() if d.getVarFlag(t, 'task') and d.getVarFlag(t, 'mounts')]:
> +        if d.getVarFlag(task, 'mounts-noauto') == "1":
> +            continue
> +        d.prependVarFlag(task, 'prefuncs', "mounts_task_prefunc ")
> +        d.appendVarFlag(task, 'postfuncs', " mounts_task_postfunc")
> +}
> +
> +MOUNTS_DB = "${TMPDIR}/mounts"
> +MOUNTS_CONTEXT ?= "default"
> +MOUNTS_LOCK = "${MOUNTS_DB}/${MOUNTS_CONTEXT}.mountlock"
> +MOUNTS_TAB = "${MOUNTS_DB}/${MOUNTS_CONTEXT}.mounttab"
> +
> +def get_requested_mounts(d, task=None):
> +    if task is None:
> +        task = d.getVar('BB_CURRENTTASK')
> +        if not task:
> +            bb.fatal("mount code running without task context!?")
> +    if task.startswith("do_"):
> +        task = task[3:]
> +    mounts = (d.getVarFlag("do_" + task, 'mounts') or "").split()

You first strip the do_ prefix, only to prepend it again. Is that
indended? If so, maybe flip it around and prepend this if missing.

> +    mounts_out = []
> +    for m in mounts:
> +        ms = m.split(':')
> +        if len(ms) == 3 and ms[0] in 'bind rbind pbind proc'.split():
> +            mounts_out.append(ms)
> +        else:
> +            bb.error(f"Invalid mount spec: {':'.join(ms)}")
> +    return mounts_out
> +
> +def read_mtab(d, mtab_file=None):
> +    from collections import namedtuple
> +    Mount = namedtuple('Mount', 'cmd source target count')
> +    if mtab_file is None:
> +        mtab_file = d.getVar("MOUNTS_TAB", True)
> +    # mtab format is "cmd:source:target:count"
> +    try:
> +        with open(mtab_file, 'r') as f:
> +            data = [line.strip().split(':') for line in f.readlines()]
> +    except FileNotFoundError:
> +        return {}
> +    mounts = {}
> +    for m in data:
> +        if not len(m) == 4:
> +            bb.fatal("corrupt mtab!?")
> +        mt = Mount._make(m)
> +        mounts[mt.target] = mt._replace(count=int(mt.count))
> +    return mounts
> +
> +def write_mtab(d, mtab, mtab_file=None):
> +    if mtab_file is None:
> +        mtab_file = d.getVar("MOUNTS_TAB", True)
> +    with open(mtab_file, 'w') as f:
> +        for cmd, source, target, count in mtab.values():
> +            f.write(f"{cmd}:{source}:{target}:{count}\n")
> +
> +def shorten_path(x, n=3):
> +    xs = x.split('/')
> +    if len(xs) <= n:
> +        return '/'.join(xs)
> +    return '.../'+'/'.join(xs[-3:])

Hope this does not cut off any differentiating information, even when
just targeting logs.

> +
> +mount_bind() {
> +    sudo -s <<'EOSUDO'
> +        SOURCE="${@d.getVar('MOUNT_ARG_SOURCE')}"
> +        TARGET="${@d.getVar('MOUNT_ARG_TARGET')}"
> +        mkdir -p "$TARGET"
> +        mountpoint -q "$TARGET" || mount --bind "$SOURCE" "$TARGET"
> +EOSUDO
> +}
> +
> +umount_bind() {
> +    sudo -s <<'EOSUDO'
> +        TARGET="${@d.getVar('UMOUNT_ARG_TARGET')}"
> +        mountpoint -q "$TARGET" && umount "$TARGET"
> +EOSUDO
> +}
> +
> +mount_rbind() {
> +    sudo -s <<'EOSUDO'
> +        SOURCE="${@d.getVar('MOUNT_ARG_SOURCE')}"
> +        TARGET="${@d.getVar('MOUNT_ARG_TARGET')}"
> +        mkdir -p "$TARGET"
> +        mountpoint -q "$TARGET" || mount --rbind "$SOURCE" "$TARGET"
> +        mount --make-rslave "$TARGET"
> +EOSUDO
> +}
> +
> +umount_rbind() {
> +    sudo -s <<'EOSUDO'
> +        TARGET="${@d.getVar('UMOUNT_ARG_TARGET')}"
> +        mountpoint -q "$TARGET" && umount -R "$TARGET"
> +EOSUDO
> +}
> +
> +mount_pbind() {
> +    sudo -s <<'EOSUDO'
> +        SOURCE="${@d.getVar('MOUNT_ARG_SOURCE')}"
> +        TARGET="${@d.getVar('MOUNT_ARG_TARGET')}"
> +        mkdir -p "$TARGET"
> +        mountpoint -q "$TARGET" || mount --bind --make-private "$SOURCE" "$TARGET"
> +EOSUDO
> +}
> +
> +umount_pbind() {
> +    sudo -s <<'EOSUDO'
> +        TARGET="${@d.getVar('UMOUNT_ARG_TARGET')}"
> +        mountpoint -q "$TARGET" && umount "$TARGET"
> +EOSUDO
> +}
> +
> +mount_proc() {
> +    sudo -s <<'EOSUDO'
> +        TARGET="${@d.getVar('MOUNT_ARG_TARGET')}"
> +        mkdir -p "$TARGET"
> +        mountpoint -q "$TARGET" || mount -t proc none "$TARGET"
> +EOSUDO
> +}
> +
> +umount_proc() {
> +    sudo -s <<'EOSUDO'
> +        TARGET="${@d.getVar('UMOUNT_ARG_TARGET')}"
> +        mountpoint -q "$TARGET" && umount "$TARGET"
> +EOSUDO
> +}
> +
> +python mounts_task_prefunc () {
> +    from collections import namedtuple
> +    Mount = namedtuple('Mount', 'cmd source target count')
> +    task = d.getVar('PN') + ':' + d.getVar('BB_CURRENTTASK')
> +    lock = bb.utils.lockfile(d.getVar("MOUNTS_LOCK"))
> +    mounts = get_requested_mounts(d)
> +    mtab = read_mtab(d)
> +    for cmd, source, target in mounts:
> +        mt = mtab.get(target)
> +        if mt:
> +            count = mt.count + 1
> +            bb.debug(1, f"mount({task}): already mounted {shorten_path(mt.source)} at {shorten_path(mt.target)}, cnt={count}")
> +            mtab[target] = mt._replace(count=count)
> +            continue
> +        bb.debug(1, f"mount({task}): mounting {shorten_path(source)} at {shorten_path(target)}, cnt=1")
> +        d.setVar('MOUNT_ARG_SOURCE', source)
> +        d.setVar('MOUNT_ARG_TARGET', target)
> +        bb.build.exec_func('mount_' + cmd, d)

Could this fail and leave the lock blocked behind?

> +        mtab[target] = Mount(cmd, source, target, 1)
> +    write_mtab(d, mtab)
> +    bb.utils.unlockfile(lock)
> +}
> +
> +python mounts_task_postfunc () {
> +    task = d.getVar('PN') + ':' + d.getVar('BB_CURRENTTASK')
> +    lock = bb.utils.lockfile(d.getVar("MOUNTS_LOCK"))
> +    mounts = get_requested_mounts(d)
> +    mtab = read_mtab(d)
> +
> +    # release mounts
> +    for cmd, source, target in mounts:
> +        mt = mtab.get(target)
> +        if mt is None:
> +            bb.error(f"{target} not mounted. inconsistent mtab!?")
> +            continue
> +        count = mt.count - 1
> +        bb.debug(1, f"umount({task}): releasing {shorten_path(target)}, cnt={count}")
> +        mtab[target] = mt._replace(count=count)
> +
> +    # collect targets to unmount, in reverse order
> +    umounts = []
> +    for cmd, source, target in reversed(mounts):
> +        mt = mtab.get(target)
> +        if mt and mt.count == 0:
> +            umounts.append(target)
> +    for target, mt in mtab.items():
> +        if mt.count < 0:
> +            bb.error("count on {target} < 0. BUG!?!")
> +        elif mt.count == 0 and not target in umounts:
> +            umounts.append(target)
> +
> +    # now do the unmounting
> +    for target in umounts:
> +        try:
> +            bb.debug(1, f"umount({task}): unmounting {shorten_path(target)}")
> +            d.setVar('UMOUNT_ARG_TARGET', target)
> +            bb.build.exec_func('umount_' + mt.cmd, d)
> +            del mtab[target]
> +        except bb.process.ExecutionError as e:
> +            if e.exitcode == 32:
> +                # target busy
> +                bb.debug(1, f"umount({task}): target busy, moving on...")
> +            else:
> +                bb.warn(f"umount({task}): failed to unmount {target}: {str(e)}")
> +
> +    write_mtab(d, mtab)
> +    bb.utils.unlockfile(lock)
> +}
> +
> +# call postfunc explicitly in case a failing task has [mounts]
> +addhandler mounts_taskfail
> +python mounts_taskfail() {
> +    task = d.getVar('BB_CURRENTTASK')
> +    if not task:
> +        bb.fatal("mount code running without task context!?")
> +    if task.startswith("do_"):
> +        task = task[3:]
> +    if d.getVarFlag("do_" + task, 'mounts') and not d.getVarFlag("do_" + task, 'mounts-noauto') == "1":
> +        bb.build.exec_func('mounts_task_postfunc', d)
> +}
> +mounts_taskfail[eventmask] = "bb.build.TaskFailed"
> +
> +# bb.event.Build* handlers don't have a task context.
> +# Don't access MOUNTS_CONTEXT from here!
> +addhandler mounts_init
> +python mounts_init() {
> +    bb.utils.remove(d.getVar('MOUNTS_DB') + "/*.mounttab")
> +    bb.utils.remove(d.getVar('MOUNTS_DB') + "/*.mountlock")
> +}
> +mounts_init[eventmask] = "bb.event.BuildStarted"
> +
> +addhandler mounts_cleanup
> +python mounts_cleanup() {
> +    # look through MOUNTS_DB for contexts
> +    import glob
> +    import time
> +    base = d.getVar('MOUNTS_DB')
> +    locks = glob.glob(base + "/*.mountlock")
> +    tabs = glob.glob(base + "/*.mounttab")
> +
> +    # there should not be any locks?
> +    if len(locks) > 0:
> +        bb.error(f"mounts_cleanup: someone still holding lock? ({str(locks)})")
> +
> +    # cleanup any existing contexts
> +    for mtab_file in tabs:
> +        mtab = read_mtab(d, mtab_file)
> +        if len(mtab) > 0:
> +            bb.note(f"mounts_cleanup: {mtab_file.split('/')[-1]}")
> +
> +        done = []
> +        for target, mt in mtab.items():
> +            if mt.count < 0:
> +                bb.error("count on {target} < 0. BUG!?!")
> +                continue
> +            if mt.count > 0:
> +                bb.error(f"cound on {target} > 0. BUG!?!")
> +
> +            bb.note(f"mounts_cleanup: unmounting {target}")
> +            for i in range(10):
> +                try:
> +                    d.setVar('UMOUNT_ARG_TARGET', target)
> +                    bb.build.exec_func('umount_' + mt.cmd, d)
> +                    done.append(target)
> +                    break
> +                except bb.process.ExecutionError as e:
> +                    if e.exitcode == 32:
> +                        # target busy
> +                        time.sleep(1)
> +                        continue
> +                    else:
> +                        bb.error(f"umount({task}): {str(e)}")
> +                        done.append(target)
> +                        break
> +                bb.warn(f"mounts_cleanup: failed to umount {target}")
> +                done.append(target)
> +
> +        for target in done:
> +            del mtab[target]
> +        write_mtab(d, mtab, mtab_file)
> +}
> +
> +mounts_cleanup[eventmask] = "bb.event.BuildCompleted"
> diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> index 7f5901d..4726eaf 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ PARALLEL_MAKE ?= "-j ${@bb.utils.cpu_count()}"
>  BBINCLUDELOGS ??= "yes"
>  
>  # Add event handlers for bitbake
> -INHERIT += "isar-events"
> +INHERIT += "mounts isar-events"
>  
>  include conf/local.conf
>  include conf/multiconfig/${BB_CURRENT_MC}.conf
> 

With all this in place, did you see warning in build_completed() triggering?

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, T RDA IOT
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-13 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-12 13:04 [RFC PATCH 0/5] Refactor mount logic Adriaan Schmidt
2021-10-12 13:04 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] oe imports in central location Adriaan Schmidt
2021-10-12 13:04 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] meta: refactor containerization Adriaan Schmidt
2021-10-13 10:17   ` Jan Kiszka
2021-10-12 13:04 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] meta: add oe.utils Adriaan Schmidt
2021-10-13 10:17   ` Jan Kiszka
2021-10-20  6:49     ` Schmidt, Adriaan
2021-10-12 13:04 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] meta: add mounts class Adriaan Schmidt
2021-10-13 10:31   ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2021-10-20  7:02     ` Schmidt, Adriaan
2021-10-12 13:04 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] meta: refactor to use the new mounting mechanism Adriaan Schmidt
2021-10-13 10:42   ` Jan Kiszka
2021-10-20  9:20     ` Schmidt, Adriaan
2021-11-22 14:45 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] Refactor mount logic Anton Mikanovich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=451a6c60-63a1-fdc6-58d6-e8ce4475dbbb@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=adriaan.schmidt@siemens.com \
    --cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox