From: Alexander Smirnov <asmirnov@ilbers.de>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
isar-users <isar-users@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Build can sporadically fail due to dpkg contention in buildchroot
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 19:55:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d2b9322-54ed-ddff-739e-d0a3d5c6cc7b@ilbers.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79bd216e-53ca-5485-4f6c-66050d08ed5f@siemens.com>
Hi,
On 02/11/2018 06:17 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I got this failure of example-hello:do_build already twice while doing
> rebuild tests with my kernel series (ie. with more independent
> buildchroot users):
>
> DEBUG: Executing shell function do_build
> Get:1 file:/isar-apt isar InRelease
> Ign:1 file:/isar-apt isar InRelease
> Get:2 file:/isar-apt isar Release [2,864 B]
> Get:2 file:/isar-apt isar Release [2,864 B]
> Get:3 file:/isar-apt isar Release.gpg
> Ign:3 file:/isar-apt isar Release.gpg
> Get:4 file:/isar-apt isar/main amd64 Packages [1,135 B]
> Reading package lists...
> W: The repository 'file:/isar-apt isar Release' is not signed.
> hostname: No address associated with hostname
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> dh_prep
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> dh_install
> dh_install: Compatibility levels before 9 are deprecated (level 7 in use)
> dh_installdocs
> dh_installdocs: Compatibility levels before 9 are deprecated (level 7 in use)
> dh_installchangelogs
> dh_compress
> dh_fixperms
> dh_installdeb
> dh_installdeb: Compatibility levels before 9 are deprecated (level 7 in use)
> dh_gencontrol
> dh_md5sums
> dh_builddeb
> dpkg-deb: building package 'hello-build-deps' in '../hello-build-deps_0.2_all.deb'.
>
Good catch!
> The package has been created.
> Attention, the package has been created in the current directory,
> not in ".." as indicated by the message above!
> dpkg: error: dpkg status database is locked by another process
> mk-build-deps: dpkg --unpack failed
> [...]
>
> So we have a concurrency problem when building over the same dpkg
> database. Looks like we need to synchronize (lock-protect) the access to
> it, which also means pulling out the dependency installation from the
> regular build step. Is that feasible at all? Any alternatives (besides
> retrying such builds...)?
In general we could do this easily:
1. Split the content of build.sh into two functions, for example:
- install_build_deps
- build_package
2. Spit the bitbake do_build() into two tasks:
do_install_build_deps() {
... build.sh install_build_deps ...
}
addtask install_build_deps before do_build after do_unpack
do_build_package() {
... build.sh build_package ...
}
3. Using bitbake synchronization primitives, protect the fist task from
parallel execution.
If you are OK with this, I could do this tomorrow.
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-11 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-11 15:17 Jan Kiszka
2018-02-11 16:55 ` Alexander Smirnov [this message]
2018-02-11 18:18 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-02-11 18:44 ` Alexander Smirnov
2018-02-12 7:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-02-14 15:02 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-02-14 17:57 ` Alexander Smirnov
2018-02-14 18:04 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d2b9322-54ed-ddff-739e-d0a3d5c6cc7b@ilbers.de \
--to=asmirnov@ilbers.de \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox