From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6919450737082630144 X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b88b:: with SMTP id r11mr1892978ljp.227.1619085134406; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 02:52:14 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a2e:5c8:: with SMTP id 191ls1303944ljf.10.gmail; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 02:52:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFf9KhxNorwclTnkxEEVZlXyNMFWw8sMtVui7ZxyvgSfWUnIhwSP3K2y4TgYjvoa1o4Kt6 X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:29a:: with SMTP id b26mr1848252ljo.451.1619085133339; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 02:52:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619085133; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DpVt/IqfRobb7xhBGnibWnWqjHUXmrhCmMLaxY5ZCW+oUrU5YG8/Cy2mP/R35oxrMF clE610LltezMpdLyOLrjHdM3ow4t3GRp0oI3Ha7Q8aq3LLMzIurU+I0yXrBDlbJpt+Wr Oln6KXuxaIbJz0YJgJQ6/2zv8L6gM1lyeDxbdVxou/YWkSXn0oTFR5f+v7hYx6vTR59n XMfs1PxW6otV/axC/dc6CHEKrfijdqkWB+WTQm3yCz80dblrDbedxYH6kofYawKNB2+w jBl3YAnDWOOaIzrOVGe/iB/dDPeqPQEiCE+udULZlpZM7ZKSPpfoE/yEEr8pDPpi3euP XU0w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-language:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=d1UpVhLfaZpLF4NY1tkLvFwFQ+pVMbvTTv7o93eBt+4=; b=AEEsgNeEqAVckO2mT0+uYku7+lMJgEQZUy/V99QciaZVcHQWFADvBSUWvRJMPxzzOP B6d0VqvOrGY9xOPLSO3O6Qvq66aOjAAkxh23C+Hwf4NFzZrlHOuq/fZEQKMZxcKgIVC1 2WeH1CwF6FE7ynnD3bbPgodayRANbdtREnjS74A96/iMfisGv4bcWyGIb72aWaeYT1q3 IpUMh+Ibe3zQvCOrEag3Uy1lGmsLIhQF5HNie5pKWdQZr+jKUHcVYMyf0xME+T8m6vTL N54wzUFIYuO2MEP5xJfOZzOTFyrIRrv9xgfJco7wCqD6b62BQWcZZMgyu6gkZRPJKEHU sa+g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of amikan@ilbers.de designates 85.214.156.166 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=amikan@ilbers.de Return-Path: Received: from shymkent.ilbers.de (shymkent.ilbers.de. [85.214.156.166]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u11si351813lji.3.2021.04.22.02.52.13 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 02:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of amikan@ilbers.de designates 85.214.156.166 as permitted sender) client-ip=85.214.156.166; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of amikan@ilbers.de designates 85.214.156.166 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=amikan@ilbers.de Received: from [192.168.67.164] (mm-153-39-214-37.mgts.dynamic.pppoe.byfly.by [37.214.39.153] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by shymkent.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPSA id 13M9qBAe030689 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:52:12 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] feat: package linux-perf- in kernel recipe To: "Moessbauer, Felix" , Baurzhan Ismagulov , "isar-users@googlegroups.com" Cc: "henning.schild@siemens.com" References: <20210121105224.26285-2-felix.moessbauer@siemens.com> <20210217102830.GB20742@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> From: Anton Mikanovich Message-ID: <4d3f03d0-817a-4815-1a37-ce91388463ab@ilbers.de> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:52:06 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on shymkent.ilbers.de X-TUID: nKl/47BJzlTg Hello Felix, Are there any news regarding next version preparation? 18.02.2021 11:01, Moessbauer, Felix wrote: > Hi Baurzhan, > > Thanks for the review. > I'll change that in the next version. > > In the meantime, I discovered that there are still a couple of things missing for Debian bullseye. > They added version bindings between linux-perf and linux-perf-, so we have to build the linux-perf package as well. > I'll do that in v2 as well. > > Apart from that: IMO doing the debianization of the kernel tools (also kselftest) in the kernel recipe is way better than having it in a dedicated recipe. > Using this approach, it is also possible to use an upstream kernel, but our perf package. > Technically, we then have to fetch and build the whole kernel manually, but only the perf packages are installed. > That's a bit of extra work (which could be avoided if we check inside the kernel recipe which target is attracted. Don't know if that's possible). > > One issue with mixing upstream kernels and custom tools is still that we do not have a guarantee that these will still work when the kernel gets updated via APT. > Maybe we should pin the kernel as well... > > Best regards, > Felix -- Anton Mikanovich Promwad Ltd. External service provider of ilbers GmbH Maria-Merian-Str. 8 85521 Ottobrunn, Germany +49 (89) 122 67 24-0 Commercial register Munich, HRB 214197 General Manager: Baurzhan Ismagulov