Re: [PATCH] Fix initrd build depends after setting IMAGE_INITRD

[Zhihang Wei <wzh@ilbers.de>]

On 12/9/25 16:12, Quirin Gylstorff wrote:
>
>
> On 12/9/25 13:28, Zhihang Wei wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/9/25 13:10, Quirin Gylstorff wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On 12/9/25 13:02, Zhihang Wei wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/3/25 15:45, Quirin Gylstorff wrote:
>>>>> From: Quirin Gylstorff <quirin.gylstorff@siemens.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> As do_image is virtual task it is not executed, see log.taskorder.
>>>> I'm a bit confused because do_image_tools seems also to be a 
>>>> virtual task in image.bbclass. Why this virtual task was executed?
>>>
>>> I think do_image_tools has some implementation behind it due to wic
>>> in my case.
>>>
>>> >>>> 20251203-141015.078894 do_fetch (8603): log.do_fetch.8603
>>>>> 20251203-141015.432653 do_unpack (8817): log.do_unpack.8817
>>>>> 20251203-141016.385643 do_copy_wks_template (9626): 
>>>>> log.do_copy_wks_template.9626
>>>>> 20251203-141018.352672 do_check_swu_partition_uuids (11629): 
>>>>> log.do_check_swu_partition_uuids.11629
>>>>> 20251203-142714.202649 do_rootfs_install (269893): 
>>>>> log.do_rootfs_install.269893
>>>>> 20251203-142812.346458 do_copy_boot_files (278687): 
>>>>> log.do_copy_boot_files.278687
>>>>> 20251203-142812.347572 do_deploy_tpm2_firmware (278688): 
>>>>> log.do_deploy_tpm2_firmware.278688
>>>>> 20251203-142812.479116 do_rootfs_postprocess (278755): 
>>>>> log.do_rootfs_postprocess.278755
>>>>> 20251203-142813.723336 do_generate_image_uuid (280155): 
>>>>> log.do_generate_image_uuid.280155
>>>>> 20251203-142813.833043 do_rootfs_finalize (280281): 
>>>>> log.do_rootfs_finalize.280281
>>>>> 20251203-142813.837689 do_transform_template (280287): 
>>>>> log.do_transform_template.280287
>>>>> 20251203-142835.289802 do_rootfs_quality_check (303158): 
>>>>> log.do_rootfs_quality_check.303158
>>>>> 20251203-142835.458624 do_rootfs (303179): log.do_rootfs.303179
>>>>> 20251203-142835.545966 do_image_tools (303194): 
>>>>> log.do_image_tools.303194
>>>>> 20251203-142835.548904 do_rootfs_wicenv (303195): 
>>>>> log.do_rootfs_wicenv.303195
>>>>> 20251203-142835.635904 do_image_squashfs (303216): 
>>>>> log.do_image_squashfs.303216
>>>>> 20251203-142853.614060 do_image_verity (305205): 
>>>>> log.do_image_verity.305205
>>>>> 20251203-142916.978304 do_image_wic (309278): log.do_image_wic.309278
>>>>> 20251203-145901.333675 do_image_wic (953): log.do_image_wic.953
>>>>>
>>>>> To ensure that a custom initrd is always build attach the dependency
>>>>> to do_image_tools instead.
>>>>>
>>>>> This fixes a problem with the new IMAGE_INITRD variable in case of
>>>>> a multiconfig with two custom initrds.
>>>> Can you elaborate on this issue? Is this related with initrd image 
>>>> not being generated?
>>> The initrd was not generated - so we have a dependency issue. I 
>>> think the main issue is the anonymous python task.
>>>
>>> Quirin>
>> Can you try the patch I just sent? [PATCH] initramfs: Restore default 
>> "generate-initrd" logic in initramfs.bbclass. I want to know whether 
>> we have the same issue.
> Your patch would also fix the issue. I had some problems as it was not 
> based on next.
> Quirin>
I forgot to mention that my patch has dependency on Jan's patches, 
"rootfs: Fix disabling of initrd generation if there is a custom one" 
and "rootfs: Restore previous naming scheme in INITRD_DEPLOY_FILE".

Zhihang
>> Zhihang
>>>> Zhihang
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Quirin Gylstorff <quirin.gylstorff@siemens.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   meta/classes/image.bbclass | 2 +-
>>>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/meta/classes/image.bbclass b/meta/classes/image.bbclass
>>>>> index b030024f..b6301e17 100644
>>>>> --- a/meta/classes/image.bbclass
>>>>> +++ b/meta/classes/image.bbclass
>>>>> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ IMAGE_INITRD ?= ""
>>>>>   INITRD_DEPLOY_FILE = "${@ d.getVar('IMAGE_INITRD') or '${PN}' }- 
>>>>> ${DISTRO}-${MACHINE}-initrd.img"
>>>>>   # Make sure dependent initramfs recipe is built
>>>>> -do_image[depends] += "${@ '${IMAGE_INITRD}:do_build' if 
>>>>> '${IMAGE_INITRD}' else '' }"
>>>>> +do_image_tools[depends] += "${@ '${IMAGE_INITRD}:do_build' if 
>>>>> '${IMAGE_INITRD}' else '' }"
>>>>>   # Produce warning(s) if INITRD_IMAGE is used
>>>>>   python() {
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "isar-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to isar-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/isar-users/5379e67f-c8c7-4408-a239-1179815bf962%40ilbers.de.