Re: PRoot experiments

[Ben Brenson <benbrenson89@googlemail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2254 bytes --]

Am Freitag, 20. Oktober 2017 10:52:27 UTC+2 schrieb Claudius Heine:
>
> Hi, 
>
> On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 10:18 +0200, 'Ben Brenson' via isar-users wrote: 
> > Yes, but chroot itself is not working, which is called from 
> > multistrap when 
> > creating a rootfs with same architecture as the host system. 
>
> As far as I understand, Alex ignored this chroot issue, because he 
> triggers the package configuration manually using proot at the end. 
>
> > I also didn't specify a setupscript and my multistrap.conf looks as 
> > follows: 
> > 
> > [General] 
> > noauth=false 
> > unpack=true 
> > bootstrap=debian-stretch 
> > aptsources=debian-stretch 
> > 
> > [debian-stretch] 
> > source=http://deb.debian.org/debian 
> > suite=stretch 
> > components=main contrib non-free 
> > packages= 
> > 
> > 
> > May it be possible to provide a self contained version of multistrap? 
> > Or 
> > would that be a No-Go? 
>
> Since the multistrap project is dead, it would be ok to have a few 
> patches on it to make it fit our purpose IMO. But we are more inclined 
> to move to some other more supported bootstrapping mechanism. Maybe try 
> to put some of our needed features into upstream project. Time spend 
> there might be better used than trying to ride a dead horse. 
>
> Cheers, 
> Claudius 
>
> -- 
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk 
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany 
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-54 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: c...@denx.de 
> <javascript:> 
>
>             PGP key: 6FF2 E59F 00C6 BC28 31D8 64C1 1173 CB19 9808 B153 
>                               Keyserver: hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net



Ok,

Since the multistrap project is dead, it would be ok to have a few 
> patches on it to make it fit our purpose IMO. But we are more inclined 
> to move to some other more supported bootstrapping mechanism. Maybe try 
> to put some of our needed features into upstream project. Time spend 
> there might be better used than trying to ride a dead horse.  
>

Are there any proposals or ideas, yet?
Sounds for me like, having a mixture of multistrap and proot (at least no 
chroot) or somthing like that, would fit better to our needs.

Regards,
Benedikt
 


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3893 bytes --]