From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6916819863124049920 X-Received: by 2002:a19:5f59:: with SMTP id a25mr5372641lfj.310.1610694554480; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 23:09:14 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a19:6145:: with SMTP id m5ls1772136lfk.2.gmail; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 23:09:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEz+a9MmlgFiZEEsh/9SlqQ7fZEY/sZ2WIF97ytibuRSEpIR2Op9XLI+aXktPQCI0usCkC X-Received: by 2002:ac2:551c:: with SMTP id j28mr5033327lfk.474.1610694553173; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 23:09:13 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610694553; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Gm1hW/QD8NxyMQSlNFtVjRBYaI3y9LsrrH2kMVUhj5jEooJfH7PLqieZ3vOE1TDrqm FhX1IrPHnVVaFDBwfbF5/sFcpoqQCeaQAdbN+p07kyBJGIbpa71Rx0GZySivmisHyyq8 ILVA6tavztz/8jdlGPHKtgRhAKyQg3n0qLMK/kScCjizmG/fpYbrQz3nM6iSxG3nIUms 5tituc+4HifDTO808Cpjw3J+x1nTtZmPsDe6WTGn0st/pfEEv7kx1Uw7Wmb0k/8Qygwf jm7u8sVTFa2VCafQMQJ6z+bMDtce4+QjAucZsdlcmJNQgUOZh/0IIFeOEG8rp5dBZBa5 2JsA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:to:subject; bh=1bIwZkLJFY7T/ncLkfS6HalnMRSshuodbHjAHILKSmk=; b=jFVX4VMaH/ru117zImsHcrZvugUeSKKBDr+kh/rsVnkUmAQR2tIt4+yMGBBa4yucWs aF+1pbdKeJ3k1Js0k7mbuln/xgnh6pOJXaDbOzWdshmGZOCGPjsW08t2feiQHEghpW/B FuxwB7FsEk1OVo9u9TKciX7aowwXhj1m18fiA0/sz7P84Nnvwb1MJvaRXySFw3eQhRYg iuF70Gbtjuww3av4XmIfiDpVHrkWQnFuDLNGhol1v+XeDbV3lcx07qno4tyzRc+M09lM MsuEZ0SnoHpL/ibIQ1ejLUbO5jFnuWq+xZqLbBfwaVJ5V5YwZ+bgxkstyAxhx5UltflI IFNw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jan.kiszka@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from goliath.siemens.de (goliath.siemens.de. [192.35.17.28]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l8si278732ljc.2.2021.01.14.23.09.13 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 23:09:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.35.17.28; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jan.kiszka@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: from mail2.sbs.de (mail2.sbs.de [192.129.41.66]) by goliath.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 10F79CFg024423 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:09:12 +0100 Received: from [139.22.113.202] ([139.22.113.202]) by mail2.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 10F79CIA027567; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:09:12 +0100 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] support generation of sdk container images To: "[ext] Silvano Cirujano Cuesta" , isar-users@googlegroups.com References: <20210112103338.14712-1-silvano.cirujano-cuesta@siemens.com> From: Jan Kiszka Message-ID: <5446e5ec-e0b5-b382-eaea-39a5159ea216@siemens.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:09:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: 7mkwydwSeR5z On 14.01.21 14:56, [ext] Silvano Cirujano Cuesta wrote: > I wonder how to interpret the current feelings about this proposal: > > * There's no interest at all. > > * I haven't succeed on raising enough interest. In that case I'd need more input from people who see the demand for this functionality to better understand what's missing in my proposal. > > * There's interest, but I should update the patch according the comments up-to-now before I send a 1st patch series proposal (or a 2nd RFC). > > I'd appreciate any feedback. The more decision power the person giving the feedback, the more valuable it is for me :-) > The level of feedback you received is already quite good for a first round :), and there is usually no early feedback from maintainers. I would say update the series, addressing that smaller issue(s) and remove the RFC. I'll also give that a try soon. Thanks a lot, Jan -- Siemens AG, T RDA IOT Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux