From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6727995572123336704 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d8d5:: with SMTP id k21mr22444444eds.167.1566889822386; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:10:22 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a17:906:4351:: with SMTP id z17ls6316303ejm.6.gmail; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:10:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzZDdAx2guTrrt+CmJQ3W9uiuLoxDb0+oY6nJE8cr96I4DoIKi+W6vlDnxd7Q3F/XPYTOs/ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:131a:: with SMTP id w26mr20066118ejb.131.1566889821926; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:10:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1566889821; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=V8zoyuX6uTB7r+0GRJlcSjIZrGO41WTnvSRLJejDquvJGm/AklptbCbLshmTF9aOAy acIKEQLZcZ64N1VoVi3P3UM35SMq56TonlZmv+auKEas0NmjwE2CqL197jQ03kHpAm7M s/EJx2FJRoQLeTFpGfDdKpQcPXV7GKmZ/o/ZT289Slp6uyxBZ4MFNYTTICFVzNs4VTiH zh9n9eaja7ZoJycbyYWjVayinuRMqLnuppSCRDC1fozCX7UJcY3aOqn3hWVRGh+n6JNu rqCQvDXkJRzC+1PmN1e+wPgNiHqR+zTc2f6Of0Z5FiIMnVGQIkuUMJwTbVWYqhqiRc5S whRw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:to:subject; bh=2ABd6AZEdyucrpr+o2TSyzGO4Y6kfy1+HuV/uafFfOg=; b=N5N3XiRcI6VvypRudiuH0eOMfPqPvQJZ4QZ4LbVEYfzelwFTTpxquLJ7i9dElzJmmW zz6MvHDo9zwumrRq5T1uSMHXv50HAKjSBAwmiEi64BbV9BP5foEB0vUxKPJY4BYULkSR BCRGm6NordcIo01DeV6ft7tHnC1wZ9suBvw3sYgPBbuyg7cPFLOXk8EqmBKSFC3hqa0J GZ84NMk9O2rqiVMWJr9yDsMN7Am4ZEogNCG7+kgarfu1k4Nl5e+imzcVAbsAJ+qsxv/D QGNW2pCJAOUNmY9XWwYqZWy2YMjenI4INf/IwkYmsH1O7Lmj/Ynakp2FVELl1UW8tZYW +KeA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.39 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jan.kiszka@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from lizzard.sbs.de (lizzard.sbs.de. [194.138.37.39]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m29si818628edb.3.2019.08.27.00.10.21 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:10:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.39 as permitted sender) client-ip=194.138.37.39; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 194.138.37.39 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jan.kiszka@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: from mail1.sbs.de (mail1.sbs.de [192.129.41.35]) by lizzard.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7R7ALuu000660 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:10:21 +0200 Received: from [167.87.43.166] ([167.87.43.166]) by mail1.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x7R7ALhO005238 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:10:21 +0200 Subject: Re: isar-bootstrap failures with debian-buster targets To: isar-users References: <20190822144706.GA6062@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <00b7f2ea-a868-c06e-e64f-e735482be819@siemens.com> <20190822152700.GB6062@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <20190827043332.GJ6062@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> From: Jan Kiszka Message-ID: <5b671fed-4dbc-1beb-e9bd-3f67b1a804df@siemens.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:10:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190827043332.GJ6062@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: Q3Jx70wZ5IU4 On 27.08.19 06:33, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 02:26:57PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> A while ago it was 100%: Tried multiconfig:qemuarm-buster:isar-image-base >> multiple times in a row, without passing. Then it worked with >> kasproject/kas-isar:1.0 which was stretch-based. And now it's even passing >> with kas-isar:latest. Weird. > > FWIW, this also occurred on an internal Jenkins machine (stretch host, stretch > workspace, no docker). This happening only with buster target, we have only two > candidates: bug in qemu or bug Debian, no? Yeah, stretch host does not seem to make a difference. I've seen it meanwhile also with the stretch-based kas image. Should we try to file bug? Question is: against which component? debootstrap? Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux