From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6920633892472881152 X-Received: by 2002:a50:eb96:: with SMTP id y22mr402606edr.159.1611580310819; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 05:11:50 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a17:906:994c:: with SMTP id zm12ls6297719ejb.11.gmail; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 05:11:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxjHEmHHF+WIky7R6v0C8X4q9aAOkvyOj+n3rtkY83bRkJTpdCI1W0CX9binyo2r8U4b1A5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f0c3:: with SMTP id dk3mr320360ejb.540.1611580309775; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 05:11:49 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611580309; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hRqMDk5229fJKMdrqkPECP07mRTup2FpAXZ4PxS5MtoxTu0ocjHnrNpt2zd+JzKtbO RLRNJ1JzLs8zXOduFP4zzGDLFgLv+Wvvm61KtA7KfjN+wqDzARbz+Wgh4vq3E/hDsSRx CvO5PSYozmREZmclOAdySd4eZyU0MKUOQIJCIa76tg7A9QCi6zKNkpyTH3+HRzenrWEY ZkeWAdjjAT86fVzTIjcSGJSb7xBAfehiwlSH/XGZAj2q2LeA3GNmmttBYkWpMTYGPe4t GTeJdQL14qHRL0i89OMpbzCNX9RjoZrMdoPTMCAUP7K8L89E+3fIkhTm9YhYiXdh7oWP r3EA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:to:subject; bh=KtkENKbeUCtv8PvVBeMpMIfd4S1twz6rlAAHNVD/5yQ=; b=RXg5YbToXyBFY6Iervvttnh/K6sOvPYW4HwZCEcB8F7FTUzAXiTach4TRDL82zT6bl XSQ7p9MbBqmN9xk33Y0ZKl+Vq+cyDAUAlFzqwxAiUiFYE8yKCchmBX6M3FlyYgf0bed5 g+9RTwPJHorBb3L+s8/IQxGgo/UotZ/wRG3y5mTdWAkE3tNYTLObILivKNBFMrqNJX92 EPyTX3psFiEHGDy/dMC+rCWQoiK/68oLQYqbtHcx358foh8NdgEBwR30DqTEP4IksFu9 +UuWVB2vFhSnd5/Omze+eEDOVBPgq8hm/LdZtbIyJRA5seckvfvRNIWNx+bxBXQPkb4O YYAA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.14 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jan.kiszka@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de. [192.35.17.14]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k20si761731edx.3.2021.01.25.05.11.49 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 05:11:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.14 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.35.17.14; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.14 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jan.kiszka@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: from mail2.sbs.de (mail2.sbs.de [192.129.41.66]) by david.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 10PDBnre011566 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:11:49 +0100 Received: from [139.22.43.13] ([139.22.43.13]) by mail2.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 10PDBmI4020437; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:11:49 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-custom: Fix decompressed kernel name for arm64 To: Anton Mikanovich , isar-users@googlegroups.com References: <20210122171354.28330-1-amikan@ilbers.de> <10725c2e-109e-cb42-fcf6-c9141ef2599d@ilbers.de> From: Jan Kiszka Message-ID: <5bf5becc-0742-bc00-335e-d606dbb3077a@siemens.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 14:11:48 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <10725c2e-109e-cb42-fcf6-c9141ef2599d@ilbers.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: +lNP2Z/A7sBj On 25.01.21 13:51, Anton Mikanovich wrote: > 25.01.2021 15:32, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 22.01.21 18:13, Anton Mikanovich wrote: >>> We are performing gunzip from vmlinuz on arm64, so output should have >>> correct naming. >>> >> What's the practical impact of this change? How did you notice it? Can >> anything break that expected the old incorrect name? >> >> Jan > > I've noticed that when building custom kernel for imx8 (which is arm64) > on one of the private projects. Naming decompressed image as compressed > one cause bootloader configuring issues and general misunderstanding. > Moreover, the same logic is already fixed for riscv, so arm64 also > should work in the same way. > All additional logic assuming incorrect name should be fixed of course. > We have tons of arm64 systems out there, that's why I'm asking cautiously. If you can't specify the impact, whether if it requires a RECIPE-API-CHANGELOG entry e.g., I guess we need to test it... Jan -- Siemens AG, T RDA IOT Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux