From: "vijaikumar....@gmail.com" <vijaikumar.kanagarajan@gmail.com>
To: isar-users <isar-users@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] WIC update
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 07:57:02 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c9718f0-1f8b-4e99-b1c0-cf5dbd2e5f15n@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <656ef7b0-a606-8237-87c4-d004c945b4a1@siemens.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2936 bytes --]
On Monday, August 31, 2020 at 7:33:16 PM UTC+5:30 Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 24.08.20 11:27, Vijai Kumar K wrote:
> > The following series updates the wic to the latest one from
> > openembedded core. The git tree is available here.
> >
> > https://github.com/vj-kumar/isar/tree/wic/staging0
> >
> > Below are summary of key changes in the below series.
> >
> > P3 & P6:
> > The latest version of WIC detects the presence of fakeroot using
> > pseudo_dir(${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/../pseudo). If this is non-existent it
> doesnot
> > use fakeroot. P3 handles that quirk. There is also a standalone
> invocation of
> > pseudo which P6 tries to handle via wic_fakeroot.
> >
> > In case of ISAR, we need wic_fakeroot as fakeroot only for 2 purposes.
> > 1. To workaround fsck return values for stretch
> > 2. To handle standalone invocation of pseudo(P4 in series)
> >
> > Number 2 is not needed if we dont use fakeroot.
> >
> > The alternative approach to fakeroot is to carry patches on top of wic
> > directory instead of working around such quirks using fakeroot. The
> downside
> > being the need to rebase the local changes on future updates of wic.
> >
> >
> > P4 & P5:
> > These cherry-picked changes address the --exclude-path issues which
> Henning
> > has addressed in [2]. Should be dropped once that is merged.
> >
> > P9:
> > P9 is needed for --include-path to work. I have observed that
> --include-path
> > does not yet work/broken in the latest OE-core/poky. Posted a query in
> [1]. In ISAR
> > it works with P9 fix. P9 fix could also be relevant upstream and can be
> sent there
> > for review.
> >
> > Apart from the normal qemu build test, Below are the list of features
> tested.
> > KS API:
> > --exclude-path
> > --include-path
> > --fsuuid
> > --overhead-factor
> > --fixed-size
> > --use-label
> > --use-uuid
> >
> > Standalone invocations:
> > wic ls
> > wic cp
> > wic rm
> >
> > Currently in the process of finding a way to test wic features
> automatically. Some wic features
> > like -fsuuid cannot be validated till we boot the target. Need to find a
> generalized way for
> > testing the available wic features. The approach in hand is to use a
> wic-test.wks file and
> > generate qemu image with that to validate the wic features.
> >
> > [1] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/poky/message/12151
> > [2] https://groups.google.com/g/isar-users/c/xePCyEl2qhM/m/mwFdeou0AQAJ
> >
>
> FWIW, I've tested a couple of images built by jailhouse-images, and no
> issues so far.
>
> Jan
>
Thank you Jan. Also, I have tested the wic with jailhouse-images &
isar-siemens project. No
issues were found.
https://github.com/vj-kumar/jailhouse-images/commits/wic/update
+
https://github.com/vj-kumar/isar/commits/wic/staging1
Best,
Vijai Kumar K
> --
> Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
> Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4580 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-31 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-24 9:27 Vijai Kumar K
2020-08-24 9:27 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] wic: Update to the latest wic from openembedded core Vijai Kumar K
2020-08-24 9:27 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] wic/plugins: Fix wic plugins to work with the latest wic Vijai Kumar K
2020-08-24 9:27 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] wic-img: Satisfy the quirks of " Vijai Kumar K
2020-08-24 9:27 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] oe.path: Add copyhardlink() helper function Vijai Kumar K
2020-08-24 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] lib/oe/path: try hardlinking instead of guessing when it might fail Vijai Kumar K
2020-08-24 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] wic_fakeroot: Handle standalone pseudo invocations Vijai Kumar K
2020-08-24 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] meta-isar/conf: Add provision to debug WIC Vijai Kumar K
2020-08-24 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] debian-common: Add tar as a dependency for wic Vijai Kumar K
2020-08-24 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] scripts/lib/wic: Add /bin to the list of searchpaths Vijai Kumar K
2020-08-24 11:02 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] meta-isar/canned-wks: Remove /boot mountpoint Vijai Kumar K
2020-08-31 14:03 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] WIC update Jan Kiszka
2020-08-31 14:57 ` vijaikumar....@gmail.com [this message]
2020-09-01 16:53 ` vijaikumar....@gmail.com
2020-09-01 16:57 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c9718f0-1f8b-4e99-b1c0-cf5dbd2e5f15n@googlegroups.com \
--to=vijaikumar.kanagarajan@gmail.com \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox