Re: [PATCH 7/7] meta: Add barebox bootloader support

[Anton Mikanovich <amikan@ilbers.de>]

10.02.2022 11:05, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 10.02.22 08:58, Anton Mikanovich wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/barebox/barebox_2021.04.0-phy5.bb
>>>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/barebox/barebox_2021.04.0-phy5.bb
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..ed8842c
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/barebox/barebox_2021.04.0-phy5.bb
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>>>> +# This software is a part of ISAR.
>>>> +# Copyright (C) 2022 ilbers GmbH
>>>> +
>>>> +inherit dpkg
>>>> +
>>>> +require barebox.inc
>>>> +
>>>> +SRC_URI +=
>>>> "https://git.phytec.de/barebox/snapshot/barebox-2021.04.0-phy5.tar.bz2 \
>>> Do we really want to or have to promote downstream BSP anti-patterns
>>> here? Upstream barebox does not work?
>>>
>>> I'm mentioning this as I worked hard to avoid that bad practice for the
>>> TF-A, OP-TEE, and U-Boot examples we provide.
>> Upstream barebox will probably need some patching.
>> But it should be not so hard to adapt, so I can try.
> If upstream barebox is incomplete then why use it? Upstream U-Boot works
> on that board (that's why we used it so far).
>
> Jan
>
Upstream barebox actually boots ok, but when using env generated by
phytec yocto it tries to call some extended commands. So there can be
two ways: to patch barebox or to change environment.