Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] fix rebuild of rootfs_finalize task

["Moessbauer, Felix" <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>]

On Sat, 2023-01-14 at 23:47 +0300, Uladzimir Bely wrote:
> In the email from Thursday, 12 January 2023 08:56:10 +03 user Felix
> Moessbauer 
> wrote:
> > [PATCH v2 01/10] fix rebuild of rootfs_finalize task
> 
> Again, we had 4 different solutions for this (as single patches)

I'm fully aware of that. In the end it is the maintainers decision
which patch to integrate. We just need the fix here as otherwise the
whole reproducibility story cannot be tested.

I'm perfectly fine with taking Hennings patch. It anyways looks like we
will need a v3 of this series. Then, I can either add Hennings patch or
simply rebase against next in case one of the patches will already be
integrated then.

PS: Please do not discuss details of this particular patch as part of
this series. It is really only a necessary enabler, but has been sent
as dedicated patches already. Please discuss it on the original patch
series.

Felix

> 
> Felix: [PATCH] fix rebuild of rootfs_finalize task
> Roberto: [PATCH v4] image: make sure do_rootfs_finalize can run
> multiple 
> times, v4
> Roberto: [PATCH] image class bugfix: interuption does not break the
> rebuild
> Henning: [PATCH] image: make sure do_rootfs_finalize can run multiple
> times
> 
> Now, the first one comes as part of series... I think, we should pick
> Henning's solution instead, since it acts better ("check first than
> do stuff" 
> instead of "try stuff and 'true' if fails), and drop the alternative
> patch 
> from the series.
> 
>