From: Claudius Heine <claudius.heine.ext@siemens.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
isar-users <isar-users@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Deprecating Raspberry Pi
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:30:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6fe727b6-3437-1242-9235-9b7bae86268e@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a66e7108-2398-e502-7408-40102f405a8f@siemens.com>
Hi Jan,
On 11/02/2019 13.48, Jan Kiszka wrote:
[...]
>> If that target is not maintained and used, then I would be in favor of
>> removing it from meta-isar.
>>
>> I just tried to boot the 'isar-image-base.rpi-sdimg' image of the
>> current next branch (d88c739323ecdecc) on a Raspberry Pi 1 without
>> success.
>
> The RPi1 is probably also an uninteresting target by now.
I agree.
>
>>
>> Currently RPi support with jessie is holding us back to deprecate
>> jessie and removing the loop mounts that is required by the old
>> versions of mkfs.ext4. So I would be in favor of eigher removing RPi1
>> support or switching to stretch with that, if there are maintainers
>> that regularly test if booting works.
>
> Keeping a non-Debian target would have the value to stress our
> abstractions. But that only works if the target is recent enough
> (Stretch or newer), frequently built and run as well.
Yes. One additional point is if we have the man-power and will to
support non-Debian distributions. And If we do, we have to ask if
Raspbian is the most interesting one or if for instance Ubuntu for
RPi2+3 would be more useful for people. Maybe we could stick to just VM
targets in meta-isar, so that booting is easy to test.
regards,
Claudius
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-54 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: ch@denx.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-11 12:41 Claudius Heine
2019-02-11 12:48 ` Jan Kiszka
2019-02-11 13:30 ` Claudius Heine [this message]
2019-02-11 13:51 ` [PATCH] remove raspberry support claudius.heine.ext
2019-02-11 14:03 ` Jan Kiszka
2019-02-12 9:30 ` [PATCH v2] remove RaspberryPi support claudius.heine.ext
2019-02-12 11:39 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-02-12 12:41 ` Claudius Heine
2019-02-12 16:40 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-02-12 16:49 ` Claudius Heine
2019-02-17 10:16 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-02-11 14:03 ` [Discussion] Deprecating Raspberry Pi Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-02-11 14:11 ` Claudius Heine
2019-02-11 14:27 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-02-11 15:17 ` Claudius Heine
2019-02-17 10:44 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-02-18 8:44 ` Claudius Heine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6fe727b6-3437-1242-9235-9b7bae86268e@siemens.com \
--to=claudius.heine.ext@siemens.com \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox