On Tuesday, March 31, 2020 at 11:17:32 PM UTC+5:30, Henning Schild wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 22:24:43 +0200 > Baurzhan Ismagulov > wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 12:01:15PM +0100, Henning Schild wrote: > > > > Thanks, my first two builds succeeded. Your #158 failed due to > > > > timeout executing the images, possibly due to nightly builds > > > > starting (on the old server, we needed up to -t 960). I've > > > > enabled log timestamps for your job. > > > > > > I had a look at 158 and decided to ignore the "failure". > > > > I don't think that blocks your series, either. The question was > > rather what to do to avoid false failures in the future. I've > > increased the timeouts from 300 s to 600 s, also for your project. > > > > Applied to next, thanks. > > Cool, thanks! > > Finally got this off my shoulders, now waiting for follow-up complaints > ... hopefully not too many ;). > Hi Henning, Quick question. Though it does not affect any existing functionality, I see that all the debs are cached inside ${DEBDIR}/${DISTRO} directory. When {HOST_DISTRO} != {DISTRO} shouldn't we ideally cache the relevant bootstrap packages in their appropriate {DEBDIR}/{HOST_DISTRO} directory? One applicable case is rpi-stretch. Thanks, Vijai Kumar K > Henning > > > With kind regards, > > Baurzhan. > > > >