On Tuesday, March 31, 2020 at 11:17:32 PM UTC+5:30, Henning Schild wrote:

On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 22:24:43 +0200
Baurzhan Ismagulov <i...@radix50.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 12:01:15PM +0100, Henning Schild wrote:
> > > Thanks, my first two builds succeeded. Your #158 failed due to
> > > timeout executing the images, possibly due to nightly builds
> > > starting (on the old server, we needed up to -t 960). I've
> > > enabled log timestamps for your job.
> >
> > I had a look at 158 and decided to ignore the "failure".
>
> I don't think that blocks your series, either. The question was
> rather what to do to avoid false failures in the future. I've
> increased the timeouts from 300 s to 600 s, also for your project.
>
> Applied to next, thanks.

Cool, thanks!

Finally got this off my shoulders, now waiting for follow-up complaints
... hopefully not too many ;).

Hi Henning,

Quick question. Though it does not affect any existing functionality, I see that all the debs are cached inside ${DEBDIR}/${DISTRO} directory. When {HOST_DISTRO} != {DISTRO} shouldn't we ideally cache the relevant bootstrap packages in their appropriate {DEBDIR}/{HOST_DISTRO} directory? One applicable case is rpi-stretch.

Thanks,

Vijai Kumar K

Henning

> With kind regards,
> Baurzhan.
>