From: ydirson@free.fr
To: isar-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: isar-bootstrap
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 01:33:51 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <853542706.1343708285.1635204831683.JavaMail.root@zimbra39-e7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1723895297.1343656873.1635201406531.JavaMail.root@zimbra39-e7>
Hello,
While reading the isar-bootstrap recipe to get the gist of it, I
stumbled on what looks like just a typo, but could possibly be more
than that:
I was trying to get a grasp on DISTRO_APT_SOURCES handling, and noticed
a spurious match for "distro_apt_sources" in DISTRO_APT_PREFERENCES handling.
While this possibly was meant to read "distro_apt_preferences" instead,
it raises the question of whether it is useful to add all of this to SRC_URI
if not adding it did not cause any problem (it does not appear to be used
by any conf in isar itself, but I guess it is/has been used in downstream
layers).
This brought me to where this gets used (both _SOURCES and _PREFERENCES in fact),
ie. do_apt_config_prepare: the whole point of SRC_URI is to direct the fetcher
to download/copy source files into $WORKDIR, and then later tasks (unpack/patch
in OE) take files from there. But here, $WORKDIR is not used, and instead
aggregate_files() uses resolve_file() on them. At first sight this seems
to break the bitbake abstractions (and seems unnecessarily complicated at
the same time). Am I missing something, or is it worth for me to try patching ?
On a related note, I assume that aggregate_files() was meant to support distro
versions predating preferences.d/ and sources.list.d/ - would it be correct
to use the latter instead to simply things further ? Most recent is preferences.d/,
released with 0.7.22 in 2009, and stretch which seems to be the oldest supported
distro has 1.4.
The chroot-setup.sh script there also seems to do things that are already
handled by the debootstrap (policy.d and start-stop-daemon), except for
the upstart support. Even if someone still uses upstart (which has not been
developped since 2014), probably the rest could be omitted ?
Best regards,
--
Yann
next parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-25 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1723895297.1343656873.1635201406531.JavaMail.root@zimbra39-e7>
2021-10-25 23:33 ` ydirson [this message]
2021-10-26 7:44 ` isar-bootstrap Henning Schild
2021-10-26 18:58 ` isar-bootstrap ydirson
2021-10-26 19:44 ` isar-bootstrap Henning Schild
2021-10-26 20:48 ` isar-bootstrap ydirson
2021-10-26 21:15 ` isar-bootstrap Henning Schild
2021-10-26 21:28 ` isar-bootstrap ydirson
2021-10-28 5:44 ` isar-bootstrap Jan Kiszka
2021-10-26 9:00 ` isar-bootstrap Anton Mikanovich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=853542706.1343708285.1635204831683.JavaMail.root@zimbra39-e7 \
--to=ydirson@free.fr \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox