public inbox for isar-users@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: chombourger@gmail.com
To: isar-users <isar-users@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bitbake: update to version 1.44.0
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 23:58:06 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ba37251-4ee6-40fb-b076-a6e75ab8e183@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191022155642.h7cofdpjco3rgqcl@yssyq.m.ilbers.de>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 808 bytes --]

Thanks Baurzhan

Is this patch OK to merge then?

Cedric

On Tuesday, October 22, 2019 at 5:56:46 PM UTC+2, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:41:59AM +0200, Cedric Hombourger wrote: 
> > I have debated (with myself :)) and I agree that there are pros and cons 
> > with each approach. 
> > I ended up submitting a single commit at the end of the day to support 
> > people needing to "git bisect". 
> > I have otherwise no issues resubmitting the changes if we prefer to have 
> the 
> > bitbake upgrade clearly separated from the Isar changes (either way is 
> fine 
> > with me - @maintainers just let me know what your preference is!) 
>
> Since the bitbake commit breaks stuff, I have to prefer :) a single 
> commit. I 
> agree it is ugly. 
>
> With kind regards, 
> Baurzhan. 
>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1047 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-24  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-21 14:19 [PATCH 0/1] update bitbake " Cedric Hombourger
2019-10-21 14:19 ` [PATCH 1/1] bitbake: update " Cedric Hombourger
2019-10-22  7:36   ` Henning Schild
2019-10-22  7:41     ` Cedric Hombourger
2019-10-22 15:56       ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-10-24  6:58         ` chombourger [this message]
2019-10-24 19:44           ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-11-05 12:36             ` chombourger
2019-11-06  6:01               ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-11-06  6:02                 ` Cedric Hombourger
2019-11-08  8:05 ` [PATCH 0/1] update bitbake " Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ba37251-4ee6-40fb-b076-a6e75ab8e183@googlegroups.com \
    --to=chombourger@gmail.com \
    --cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox