From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-GM-THRID: 6750261011454885888
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 23:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: chombourger@gmail.com
To: isar-users <isar-users@googlegroups.com>
Message-Id: <8ba37251-4ee6-40fb-b076-a6e75ab8e183@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <20191022155642.h7cofdpjco3rgqcl@yssyq.m.ilbers.de>
References: <1571667598-657-1-git-send-email-Cedric_Hombourger@mentor.com>
 <1571667598-657-2-git-send-email-Cedric_Hombourger@mentor.com>
 <20191022093609.5ed343a5@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net>
 <514fe94a-882a-9b77-b554-f79b255a89d3@mentor.com>
 <20191022155642.h7cofdpjco3rgqcl@yssyq.m.ilbers.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bitbake: update to version 1.44.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_3393_186039145.1571900286766"
X-Google-Token: EP6Wxe0F8S5daOtygCo0
X-Google-IP: 139.181.48.2
X-TUID: JMln8bHGIC/A

------=_Part_3393_186039145.1571900286766
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_3394_1616939218.1571900286766"

------=_Part_3394_1616939218.1571900286766
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks Baurzhan

Is this patch OK to merge then?

Cedric

On Tuesday, October 22, 2019 at 5:56:46 PM UTC+2, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:41:59AM +0200, Cedric Hombourger wrote: 
> > I have debated (with myself :)) and I agree that there are pros and cons 
> > with each approach. 
> > I ended up submitting a single commit at the end of the day to support 
> > people needing to "git bisect". 
> > I have otherwise no issues resubmitting the changes if we prefer to have 
> the 
> > bitbake upgrade clearly separated from the Isar changes (either way is 
> fine 
> > with me - @maintainers just let me know what your preference is!) 
>
> Since the bitbake commit breaks stuff, I have to prefer :) a single 
> commit. I 
> agree it is ugly. 
>
> With kind regards, 
> Baurzhan. 
>

------=_Part_3394_1616939218.1571900286766
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<div dir="ltr">Thanks Baurzhan<div><br></div><div>Is this patch OK to merge then?</div><div><br></div><div>Cedric<br><br>On Tuesday, October 22, 2019 at 5:56:46 PM UTC+2, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:41:59AM +0200, Cedric Hombourger wrote:
<br>&gt; I have debated (with myself :)) and I agree that there are pros and cons
<br>&gt; with each approach.
<br>&gt; I ended up submitting a single commit at the end of the day to support
<br>&gt; people needing to &quot;git bisect&quot;.
<br>&gt; I have otherwise no issues resubmitting the changes if we prefer to have the
<br>&gt; bitbake upgrade clearly separated from the Isar changes (either way is fine
<br>&gt; with me - @maintainers just let me know what your preference is!)
<br>
<br>Since the bitbake commit breaks stuff, I have to prefer :) a single commit. I
<br>agree it is ugly.
<br>
<br>With kind regards,
<br>Baurzhan.
<br></blockquote></div></div>
------=_Part_3394_1616939218.1571900286766--

------=_Part_3393_186039145.1571900286766--