public inbox for isar-users@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claudius Heine <claudius.heine.ext@siemens.com>
To: "Maxim Yu. Osipov" <mosipov@ilbers.de>,
	isar-users <isar-users@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Upcoming ISAR release
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:58:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <96e3ec90-3a4d-dcb0-1645-725d5d7d7094@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b928b55f-4826-14c5-adc8-0d70646b2b4a@ilbers.de>

Hi Maxim,

On 18/02/2019 10.01, Maxim Yu. Osipov wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> 
> Last release (v0.6) was made on 1st of October 2018.
> 
> We plan to release the next version of ISAR on 1st of March, 2019.
> 
> BTW, what do you think about making a 1.0 release?

IMO we need a lot more cleanup stuff before we can do a solid 1.0 release.

We should make a list of issues that should be done before 1.0 release.

Here is a suggested checklist before 1.0:

  - Remove jessie support
  - Improve documentation
  - Cleanup the user interface variables
    - Consistent variable nameing style
    - Use feature variables instead of many VAR="1" ones. They can be 
more easily bundled together in code and docs.
  - Consistent and clear naming of things
    - Build, host, target in line with GCC and Debian definition
    - meta, meta-isar -> either meta and meta-example or meta-isar and 
meta-isar-example. Currently 'meta-isar' sounds like it is required.
  - Clearly defined task pipeline for all recipe types
    - no more do_build with stuff in it, that should be treated a the 
default target not some real one
    - dpkg_runbuild should be a task with postfunc and prefunc 
attributes to wrap mounts around it
  - Cleanup meta-isar layer to show best practices of using isar
    - multiconfig should not contain other variables than DISTRO and MACHINE

I am sure I will find a lot more of those if I think a bit harder about 
it. All of those issues makes adopting Isar for new, OE or Debian people 
alike very difficult. With the 1.0 we should try to bring Isar to a 
level were we don't expect many breaking changes on the next 1.1 release.

> At the moment I'm busy with testing/applying pending patches, I plan to 
> finish this activity in a couple of days and make a first release 
> candidate and code freeze (only bug fixes will be applied in the 'next') 
> after that.

Shouldn't we open a release staging branch for that, so that feature 
submissions can continue to next?

Cheers,
Claudius

> I'll submit later Changelog describing major changes since the last 
> release and sort out the issues present on the project's wiki.
> 
> Please inform me about any open issues that may be a subject to postpone 
> a release.



-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-54 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: ch@denx.de

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-18  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-18  9:01 Maxim Yu. Osipov
2019-02-18  9:58 ` Claudius Heine [this message]
2019-02-18 10:29   ` Maxim Yu. Osipov
2019-02-18 11:52     ` Claudius Heine
2019-02-18 17:16       ` Henning Schild
2019-02-18 20:09       ` Jan Kiszka
2019-02-18 10:07 ` Henning Schild
2019-02-18 10:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2019-02-26 14:23   ` cedric_hombourger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=96e3ec90-3a4d-dcb0-1645-725d5d7d7094@siemens.com \
    --to=claudius.heine.ext@siemens.com \
    --cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=mosipov@ilbers.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox