From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6890474322769477632 Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:11:25 -0800 (PST) From: "vijaikumar....@gmail.com" To: isar-users Message-Id: <96f074be-a70e-43d7-9eab-e74be12ed444n@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <20210215151609.GT20742@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> References: <20201102072511.26675-1-Vijaikumar_Kanagarajan@mentor.com> <20201104214447.25133bb0@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> <20201106143821.6ac5acc8@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> <3ac621cc-0006-7d1a-0a7d-5886143a372e@ilbers.de> <3cfa4810-eeb3-4a66-9558-bbd52b89731cn@googlegroups.com> <20210210112146.511b395a@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> <20210215151609.GT20742@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Add recipe for linux kselftest MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_3340_1775373607.1613625085296" X-TUID: qjT00Z/0hIPC ------=_Part_3340_1775373607.1613625085296 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3341_1747327561.1613625085296" ------=_Part_3341_1747327561.1613625085296 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Baurzhan, On Monday, February 15, 2021 at 8:46:13 PM UTC+5:30 i...@radix50.net wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:21:46AM +0100, Henning Schild wrote: > > I did not actually review it. The one question with the mainlining has > > been answered. It is not nice but the debianization of the kernel is > > isar business. > > Thanks Henning for the feedback. > > @Vijai Kumar: After seeing the perf implementation, I wonder whether we > could > harmonize towards the existing kernel infrastructure here as well. What do > you > think? I did not get a chance to look at that series yet. Will have a look and get back. Thanks, Vijai Kumar K > > With kind regards, > Baurzhan. > ------=_Part_3341_1747327561.1613625085296 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Baurzhan,
On Monday, February 15, 2021 at 8:46:13 PM UTC+5:30 i...@radix50.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:21:46AM +0100, Henning Schild wrote:
> I did not actually review it. The one question with the mainlining has
> been answered. It is not nice but the debianization of the kernel is
> isar business.

Thanks Henning for the feedback.

@Vijai Kumar: After seeing the perf implementation, I wonder whether we could
harmonize towards the existing kernel infrastructure here as well. What do you
think?

I did not get a chance to look at that series yet. Will have a look and get back.

Thanks,
Vijai Kumar K



With kind regards,
Baurzhan.
------=_Part_3341_1747327561.1613625085296-- ------=_Part_3340_1775373607.1613625085296--