From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Alexander Smirnov <asmirnov@ilbers.de>,
Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>,
isar-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] wic: now truly go for the wic version we claim to have
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:55:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9882db52-7c2e-d135-2ca5-13c5b9a722a7@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df52d78d-d1dd-aaf5-44e9-6876ca1ea4ab@ilbers.de>
On 2018-01-31 11:11, Alexander Smirnov wrote:
> On 01/31/2018 12:42 PM, Henning Schild wrote:
>> 2b164b18fd639c9 claims to introduce wic hash 131629ca6238ea05
>> This commit really carries that version of wic.
>>
>> Issue:
>> - the wic version in Isar was modified
>> - that causes:
>> - confusion, maintainability and updateability issues
>> - potential quality issues
>>
>> Impact:
>> This patch and the previous reverts get wic back to a state where all
>> these Issues are solved. We could now just update our wic without
>> having
>> to worry about local patches. In case of a wic-update Isar and layers
>> on top would still have to review their plugins.
>
> Does upstream wic script rely on the content from lib/plugins?
>
> For example some recent commit updates both:
>
> https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/commit/00420ec42140c1b752132bda190dede85756d157#diff-df4a70bc146d3159891d7a410f2521a1
>
>
> So due to customized plugins below we should worry and keep this in mind.
Sure, we have to keep an eye on wic<->plugin API changes when updating
wic to the next upstream version. Nothing new, though, when you write
plugins for wic (like we do for firmware update mechanisms, also over
Yocto).
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-31 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-31 9:41 [PATCH 0/9] first wic integration Henning Schild
2018-01-31 9:41 ` [PATCH 1/9] classes: image: introduce size measuring function, for before do_*_image Henning Schild
2018-01-31 9:41 ` [PATCH 2/9] images: new class wic-img for wic intregration Henning Schild
2018-02-13 14:44 ` Alexander Smirnov
2018-02-13 16:06 ` Henning Schild
2018-01-31 9:41 ` [PATCH 3/9] wic: add a bootimg-efi-isar plugin outside the wic tree Henning Schild
2018-02-12 17:48 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-01-31 9:41 ` [PATCH 4/9] Revert "wic: Make the bootimg-efi plugin generate usable images" Henning Schild
2018-01-31 9:41 ` [PATCH 5/9] Revert "wic: Introduce the `WicExecError` exception class" Henning Schild
2018-01-31 9:41 ` [PATCH 6/9] Revert "wic: Work around mcopy error" Henning Schild
2018-01-31 9:41 ` [PATCH 7/9] Revert "wic: Use sudo instead of pseudo" Henning Schild
2018-01-31 9:41 ` [PATCH 8/9] Revert "wic: Remove sysroot support" Henning Schild
2018-01-31 9:42 ` [PATCH 9/9] wic: now truly go for the wic version we claim to have Henning Schild
2018-01-31 10:11 ` Alexander Smirnov
2018-01-31 10:55 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2018-01-31 11:11 ` Alexander Smirnov
2018-01-31 11:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-01-31 11:53 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2018-01-31 12:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-01-31 12:28 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2018-01-31 13:53 ` Henning Schild
2018-01-31 14:01 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2018-01-31 14:21 ` Henning Schild
2018-01-31 10:02 ` [PATCH 0/9] first wic integration Alexander Smirnov
2018-01-31 10:12 ` Henning Schild
2018-01-31 11:24 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2018-01-31 11:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-01-31 12:02 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2018-01-31 12:15 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-01-31 13:30 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-01-31 13:41 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2018-01-31 14:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-01-31 15:21 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2018-01-31 15:46 ` Henning Schild
2018-01-31 16:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-01-31 13:35 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2018-01-31 13:47 ` Henning Schild
2018-01-31 14:00 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2018-01-31 13:46 ` Henning Schild
2018-01-31 13:36 ` Henning Schild
2018-01-31 13:40 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2018-01-31 13:05 ` Henning Schild
2018-02-01 12:41 ` [PATCH] images: wic: limit use of sudo and enable manual call again Henning Schild
2018-02-01 12:44 ` Henning Schild
2018-02-01 16:09 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2018-02-01 18:10 ` Henning Schild
2018-02-01 18:55 ` Henning Schild
2018-02-12 19:07 ` Henning Schild
2018-02-12 17:27 ` [PATCH 0/9] first wic integration Henning Schild
2018-02-12 18:21 ` Alexander Smirnov
2018-02-12 18:30 ` Henning Schild
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9882db52-7c2e-d135-2ca5-13c5b9a722a7@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=asmirnov@ilbers.de \
--cc=henning.schild@siemens.com \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox