CI fails on next due to cachability issues

CI fails on next due to cachability issues

[Moessbauer, Felix]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1576 bytes --]

Hi,

I just want to let you know that the CI is currently failing as the cachability test detected issues.
This is related to aefbe7f which improved the detection of cachability issues.
However, the patch itself is unrelated. It just made the bug visible.

I just spotted that while looking at the BBLAYERS variable that is under discussion on the KAS mailinglist as well.
I'm wondering why we did not spot that earlier.

Working on a fix.

Logs:
[stdlog] 2022-08-30 19:20:50,943 avocado.utils.process DEBUG| [stdout] [1;33m==== issues found in amd64:isar-image-base:rootfs_postprocess (5e919594) ====[0m
[stdlog] 2022-08-30 19:20:50,943 avocado.utils.process DEBUG| [stdout] [0;31m-> path in sources-dir: BBLAYERS = "/builds/ebsy/debian/isar/meta   /builds/ebsy/debian/isar/meta-isar   "[0m
[stdlog] 2022-08-30 19:20:50,943 avocado.utils.process DEBUG| [stdout] [1;33m==== issues found in amd64:isar-image-base:rootfs_wicenv (1e0c0d47) ====[0m
[stdlog] 2022-08-30 19:20:50,943 avocado.utils.process DEBUG| [stdout] [0;31m-> path in sources-dir: BBLAYERS = "/builds/ebsy/debian/isar/meta   /builds/ebsy/debian/isar/meta-isar   "[0m
[stdlog] 2022-08-30 19:20:50,944 avocado.utils.process DEBUG| [stdout] [1;33m==== issues found in amd64:isar-image-base:image_wic (3a0614c9) ====[0m
[stdlog] 2022-08-30 19:20:50,944 avocado.utils.process DEBUG| [stdout] [0;31m-> path in sources-dir: BBLAYERS = "/builds/ebsy/debian/isar/meta   /builds/ebsy/debian/isar/meta-isar   "[0m

Felix
--
Siemens AG, Linux Expert Center
Otto-Hahn-Ring 6, 81739 München, Germany


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4037 bytes --]

Re: CI fails on next due to cachability issues

[Schmidl, Tobias]

Hi Felix,

Am Mittwoch, dem 31.08.2022 um 11:58 +0000 schrieb Moessbauer, Felix:
> Hi,
>  
> I just want to let you know that the CI is currently failing as the
> cachability test detected issues.
> This is related to aefbe7f which improved the detection of cachability
> issues.
> However, the patch itself is unrelated. It just made the bug visible.
>  
> I just spotted that while looking at the BBLAYERS variable that is under
> discussion on the KAS mailinglist as well.
> I’m wondering why we did not spot that earlier.
>  
> Working on a fix.
>  


I've just tried to execute `scripts/ci_build.sh -q -f -d -n` based on
current next, with the following result:

```
/home/schtobia/projects/isar/isar-minimal-layer/isar/testsuite/citest.py:CcacheTest.test_ccache_rebuild: FAIL
/home/schtobia/projects/isar/isar-minimal-layer/isar/testsuite/citest.py:CrossTest.test_cross: FAIL
/home/schtobia/projects/isar/isar-minimal-layer/isar/testsuite/citest.py:RebuildTest.test_rebuild: FAIL
/home/schtobia/projects/isar/isar-minimal-layer/isar/testsuite/citest.py:SdkTest.test_sdk: FAIL
/home/schtobia/projects/isar/isar-minimal-layer/isar/testsuite/citest.py:SstateTest.test_sstate: FAIL
```

Might this be related?

Kind regards,

Tobias

RE: CI fails on next due to cachability issues

[Moessbauer, Felix]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Schmidl, Tobias (T CED SES-DE) <tobiasschmidl@siemens.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 2, 2022 1:51 PM
> To: isar-users@googlegroups.com; Moessbauer, Felix (T CED SES-DE)
> <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>
> Cc: Kiszka, Jan (T CED) <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> Subject: Re: CI fails on next due to cachability issues
> 
> Hi Felix,
> 
> Am Mittwoch, dem 31.08.2022 um 11:58 +0000 schrieb Moessbauer, Felix:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just want to let you know that the CI is currently failing as the
> > cachability test detected issues.
> > This is related to aefbe7f which improved the detection of cachability
> > issues.
> > However, the patch itself is unrelated. It just made the bug visible.
> >
> > I just spotted that while looking at the BBLAYERS variable that is
> > under discussion on the KAS mailinglist as well.
> > I’m wondering why we did not spot that earlier.
> >
> > Working on a fix.
> >
> 
> 
> I've just tried to execute `scripts/ci_build.sh -q -f -d -n` based on current next,
> with the following result:
> 
> ```
> /home/schtobia/projects/isar/isar-minimal-
> layer/isar/testsuite/citest.py:CcacheTest.test_ccache_rebuild: FAIL
> /home/schtobia/projects/isar/isar-minimal-
> layer/isar/testsuite/citest.py:CrossTest.test_cross: FAIL
> /home/schtobia/projects/isar/isar-minimal-
> layer/isar/testsuite/citest.py:RebuildTest.test_rebuild: FAIL
> /home/schtobia/projects/isar/isar-minimal-
> layer/isar/testsuite/citest.py:SdkTest.test_sdk: FAIL
> /home/schtobia/projects/isar/isar-minimal-
> layer/isar/testsuite/citest.py:SstateTest.test_sstate: FAIL ```
> 
> Might this be related?

I don't think this is related.
At least locally the CI works fine when applying my patches from Wednesday.

Could you please check the logs to find out what actually failed?

Felix

> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Tobias