RE: [RFC] add uuid to schroot folder

["Moessbauer, Felix" <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>]

> From: Anton Mikanovich <amikan@ilbers.de> 
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 8:35 PM
> To: isar-users@googlegroups.com; Moessbauer, Felix (T CED SES-DE) <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC] add uuid to schroot folder
>
> 11.07.2022 21:31, Anton Mikanovich wrote:
> PIDs are not unique across containers.
> When running the build in a container (e.g. the kas container),
> the PID of bitbake is likely the same across multiple simultaneously
> running builds.
>
> This is especially the case for CI runners, where it is common that
> multiple jobs run in parallel.
>
> This patch adds an additional UUID component stored till the end of
> the build in bitbake persistend storage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Mikanovich mailto:amikan@ilbers.de
> Signed-off-by: Felix Moessbauer mailto:felix.moessbauer@siemens.com
> Here is the version I propose as an alternative to original patch.
> Main differences are:
> 1) placing everything inside bitbake

I tried that as well but failed at writing the code in a way that BB does not complain about non-deterministic metadata.
If that works, your solution is much better.

Felix

> 2) regeneration of UUID on every bitbake run