RE: [PATCH] sstate: add cleansstate task

["Schmidt, Adriaan" <adriaan.schmidt@siemens.com>]

Kiszka, Jan, Mittwoch, 12. Januar 2022 15:02:
> On 07.01.22 09:16, Adriaan Schmidt wrote:
> > This adds the sstate cleanup task known from OE.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adriaan Schmidt <adriaan.schmidt@siemens.com>
> > ---
> >   meta/classes/base.bbclass | 8 +++++++-
> >   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/classes/base.bbclass b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
> > index d8347b9..a728211 100644
> > --- a/meta/classes/base.bbclass
> > +++ b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
> > @@ -237,7 +237,13 @@ python do_clean() {
> >   }
> >
> >   # Derived from OpenEmbedded Core: meta/classes/base.bbclass
> > -addtask cleanall after do_clean
> > +addtask cleansstate after do_clean
> > +do_cleansstate[nostamp] = "1"
> > +python do_cleansstate() {
> > +    sstate_clean_cachefiles(d)
> > +}
> > +
> > +addtask cleanall after do_cleansstate
> >   do_cleanall[nostamp] = "1"
> >   python do_cleanall() {
> >       src_uri = (d.getVar('SRC_URI', True) or "").split()
> 
> I would vote for making this a 0.8 feature, given that sstate is merged
> already and default-on. Too many case required purging me the complete
> sstate already, though only a single recipe would have been sufficient.

Agreed.
I missed that in my initial implementation, and would call it a bug...

Adriaan