On 04/19/2018 05:26 PM, Jon Nettleton wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:47 PM Henning Schild
> <henning.schild@siemens.com <mailto:henning.schild@siemens.com>> wrote:
>
> Am Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:27:36 +0000
> schrieb Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com <mailto:jon@solid-run.com>>:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 12:38 PM Henning Schild
> > <henning.schild@siemens.com <mailto:henning.schild@siemens.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Am Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:33:28 +0000
> > > schrieb Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com
> <mailto:jon@solid-run.com>>:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:19 AM Henning Schild
> > > > <henning.schild@siemens.com
> <mailto:henning.schild@siemens.com>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Am Thu, 19 Apr 2018 00:32:21 -0700
> > > > > schrieb <jon@solid-run.com <mailto:jon@solid-run.com>>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I am now building a custom debian package from our kernel
> > > > > > sources, the kernel compile goes fine. The deb-pkg is
> > > > > > failing because the number of files passed to xarg is too
> > > > > > long.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Error message is.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2018-04-19 07:11:17 - INFO - | Using default distribution
> > > > > > of 'unstable' in the changelog
> > > > > > 2018-04-19 07:11:17 - INFO - | Install lsb-release or set
> > > > > > $KDEB_CHANGELOG_DIST explicitly
> > > > > > 2018-04-19 07:11:17 - INFO - | /usr/bin/xargs: md5sum:
> > > > > > Argument list too long
> > > > > > 2018-04-19 07:11:17 - INFO - |
> > > > > > scripts/package/Makefile:90: recipe for target 'deb-pkg'
> > > > > > failed 2018-04-19 07:11:17 - INFO - | make[1]: ***
> > > > > > [deb-pkg] Error 126 2018-04-19 07:11:17 - INFO - |
> > > > > > Makefile:1347: recipe for target 'deb-pkg' failed
> > > > > > 2018-04-19 07:11:17 - INFO - | make: *** [deb-pkg]
> Error 2
> > > > > > 2018-04-19 07:11:17 - INFO - | WARNING: exit code 2
> from a
> > > > > > shell command.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > looks like on large kernel builds the file lists will need to
> > > > > > be broken up.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I have seen that before. It happens in buildchroot when using
> > > > > qemu-arm-static binfmt magic. Something in that chain seems to
> > > > > cause problems for very long argument lists.
> > > > > In my case it was a "make clean" and i removed the files from
> > > > > outside the buildchroot. But since it now happened again it is
> > > > > probably something worth looking into.
> > > > >
> > > > > Henning
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Oh interesting. I wonder if this has something to do with the
> > > > binfmt support in CentOS vs Debian. I will look into it and
> > > > report back.
> > >
> > > I saw it on Gentoo building in a debian docker container. So i
> guess
> > > the problem might be related to the binfmt wrapping in general, not
> > > distro specific.
> > >
> > > Henning
> > >
> > >
> > It looks like that was the problem. I just went through the pain of
> > building qemu 2.9.1 for Centos7...and all the dependencies that were
> > needed by it. That has fixed the custom kernel build issues.
> > Thanks for all the pointers.
> >
> > I would say for now if anyone asks you can consider Centos 7 a no
> > go. If there is interest I may add a build to Copr for other users.
> > Fedora 26 and newer should be fine.
>
> Isar calls "random" sudos all over the place. Someone actually allowing
> this on a productive system surprises me ... to say the least.
>
> My advise it to use a VM or container to run Isar in, and in that case
> going for Debian9 is easy. One example, used by many of us, is
> https://hub.docker.com/r/kasproject/kas-isar/
>
> Henning
>
>
> Yes that is what I am using to build with. I can only imagine that the
> newer build of qemu brings in a configuration to the host os that is
> required for things to build properly.
>
My host OS is Fedora for many years, so I use chroot to work with Debian
environment (for Isar as well):
$ sudo debootstrap jessie debian8-isar/ http://ftp.debian.org/debian
$ sudo chroot debian8-isar
This also could be an option.
Alex
yes very true, thanks. I am specifically interested in using docker containers to build images so I can bring up a build farm for customers that want to build production images. My main builder is x86_64 however I am looking forward to comparing the performance of that machine vs our "new" ARM64 server boards. Of course I can run run debootstrap within the container first, but since CIP is using Kas I also want to use that infrastructure.
-Jon