From: "Roberto A. Foglietta" <roberto.foglietta@gmail.com>
To: Uladzimir Bely <ubely@ilbers.de>
Cc: isar-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] deb-dl-dir class rework to use faster ln -P or fallback to cp
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 08:37:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJGKYO51oSy_QWajsG_Yymy6ZKXg6zCvpkW-B6Nz+MXPjwRMGA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6850064.9J7NaK4W3v@home>
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 07:32, Uladzimir Bely <ubely@ilbers.de> wrote:
>
> In the email from понедельник, 6 февраля 2023 г. 16:09:19 +03 user
> roberto.foglietta@linuxteam.org wrote:
> > From: "Roberto A. Foglietta" <roberto.foglietta@gmail.com>
> >
> > deb-dl-dir, feature: faster when using ln -P otherwise fallback to cp
> >
> > The original class functions deb_dl_dir_import/export were using cp to
> > copy debian package to the target rootfs but this approach is quite slow
> > while using hard link does not work if the destination and source dirs
> > are not lying on the same filesystem. Thus, ln -P should fallback to cp
> > when it does not work (which is different from complaining on stderr).
> >
> > Moreover, these two functions have been reworked to reach a straight
> > forward and more compact form. In particular, export function was using
> > bashism to do some kind of comparison which after all is useless
> > because copying back without overwriting just fulfills that part.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roberto A. Foglietta <roberto.foglietta@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > meta/classes/deb-dl-dir.bbclass | 41 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/classes/deb-dl-dir.bbclass
> > b/meta/classes/deb-dl-dir.bbclass index 3b1517dc..22de7bf6 100644
> > --- a/meta/classes/deb-dl-dir.bbclass
> > +++ b/meta/classes/deb-dl-dir.bbclass
> > @@ -78,39 +78,44 @@ debsrc_download() {
> >
> > deb_dl_dir_import() {
> > export pc="${DEBDIR}/${2}"
> > - export rootfs="${1}"
> > - sudo mkdir -p "${rootfs}"/var/cache/apt/archives/
> > + export sc="${1}/var/cache/apt/archives/"
> > + sudo mkdir -p "${sc}"
> > [ ! -d "${pc}" ] && return 0
> > + export tf=$(ls -1 "${pc}"/*.deb | head -n1)
> > + [ ! -e "${tf}" ] && return 0
> > flock -s "${pc}".lock -c '
> > set -e
> > printenv | grep -q BB_VERBOSE_LOGS && set -x
> >
> > - sudo find "${pc}" -type f -iname "*\.deb" -exec \
> > - cp -n --no-preserve=owner -t
> > "${rootfs}"/var/cache/apt/archives/ {} + + sudo ln -Pf -t "${sc}"
> > "${tf}" 2>/dev/null ||:
>
> I'm not sure that assumption "if one hardlink failed, other also will fail"
> (and vice versa) would always be true.
Yes, it is true. If further failures happen it is not because of the
destination/source nature. Instead of the opposite, the return code
does not always lead to a failure in a way we suppose.
Best regards, R-
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-07 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-06 13:09 roberto.foglietta
2023-02-07 6:32 ` Uladzimir Bely
2023-02-07 7:37 ` Roberto A. Foglietta [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJGKYO51oSy_QWajsG_Yymy6ZKXg6zCvpkW-B6Nz+MXPjwRMGA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=roberto.foglietta@gmail.com \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
--cc=ubely@ilbers.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox