public inbox for isar-users@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
To: Cedric Hombourger <Cedric_Hombourger@mentor.com>
Cc: isar-users@googlegroups.com,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
	Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] builddeb: generate multi-arch friendly linux-libc-dev package
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 09:43:04 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASCmZyS11WkUWXLXVWgk-WU5JV=MMw=S6pXAzMhkVJ40Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1560752096-1323-1-git-send-email-Cedric_Hombourger@mentor.com>

CCed a couple of people.

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 3:15 PM Cedric Hombourger
<Cedric_Hombourger@mentor.com> wrote:
>
> Debian-based distributions place libc header files in a machine
> specific directory (/usr/include/<libc-machine>) instead of
> /usr/include/asm to support installation of the linux-libc-dev
> package from multiple architectures. Move headers installed by
> "make headers_install" accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cedric Hombourger <Cedric_Hombourger@mentor.com>
> Reviewed-by: Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>
> ---
>  scripts/package/builddeb | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/package/builddeb b/scripts/package/builddeb
> index b03dd56a4782..8f7afb3a84e9 100755
> --- a/scripts/package/builddeb
> +++ b/scripts/package/builddeb
> @@ -132,6 +132,11 @@ fi
>  if [ "$ARCH" != "um" ]; then
>         $MAKE -f $srctree/Makefile headers_check
>         $MAKE -f $srctree/Makefile headers_install INSTALL_HDR_PATH="$libc_headers_dir/usr"
> +       # move asm headers to /usr/include/<libc-machine>/asm to match the structure
> +       # used by Debian-based distros (to support multi-arch)
> +       libc_mach=$($CC -dumpmachine)
> +       mkdir $libc_headers_dir/usr/include/$libc_mach
> +       mv $libc_headers_dir/usr/include/asm $libc_headers_dir/usr/include/$libc_mach/
>  fi
>
>  # Install the maintainer scripts


I am not sure but,
I just worried about the backward compatibility...
Was this previously broken?

I guess debian is using own control file
instead of the one in upstream kernel.
So, this is almost a matter for developers, I think.

How did debian-base distros managed this before,
and will this introduce no breakage?

Ben,
Could you comment on this?


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-04  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-17  6:14 Cedric Hombourger
2019-07-04  0:43 ` Masahiro Yamada [this message]
2019-07-04 12:39   ` Cedric Hombourger
2019-07-04 13:10   ` Ben Hutchings
2019-07-04 19:42     ` [PATCH v2] " Cedric Hombourger
2019-07-04 19:49       ` Ben Hutchings
2019-07-04 20:28         ` Cedric Hombourger
2019-07-04 20:50         ` [PATCH v3 0/1] builddeb: generate multi-arch friendly linux-libc-dev Cedric Hombourger
2019-07-04 20:50           ` [PATCH v3 1/1] builddeb: generate multi-arch friendly linux-libc-dev package Cedric Hombourger
2019-07-07  8:58             ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-07-09  7:43               ` [PATCH v4 0/1] builddeb: generate multi-arch friendly linux-libc-dev Cedric Hombourger
2019-07-09  7:43                 ` [PATCH v4] builddeb: generate multi-arch friendly linux-libc-dev package Cedric Hombourger
2019-07-09 10:20                   ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-07-11 14:46                   ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-07-14  7:49                     ` Cedric Hombourger
2019-07-17  5:47                     ` Henning Schild
2019-07-20 20:16                       ` chombourger
2019-09-02 17:40                         ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK7LNASCmZyS11WkUWXLXVWgk-WU5JV=MMw=S6pXAzMhkVJ40Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    --cc=Cedric_Hombourger@mentor.com \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
    --cc=riku.voipio@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox