From: vijai kumar <vijaikumar.kanagarajan@gmail.com>
To: Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>
Cc: isar-users <isar-users@googlegroups.com>,
Vijai Kumar K <Vijaikumar_Kanagarajan@mentor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] meta: cache deb srcs as part of postprocessing
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:59:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALLGG_+qawggJT4GG92HUuxZH5jyDny+r2o0J-_vADXksbkffQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200408143008.6e2caa90@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net>
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 6:00 PM Henning Schild
<henning.schild@siemens.com> wrote:
>
> Am Wed, 8 Apr 2020 16:07:15 +0530
> schrieb vijai kumar <vijaikumar.kanagarajan@gmail.com>:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 3:34 PM Henning Schild
> > <henning.schild@siemens.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Am Fri, 3 Apr 2020 18:35:51 +0530
> > > schrieb Vijai Kumar K <vijaikumar.kanagarajan@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Collect the deb sources of the corresponding deb binaries cached
> > > > in DEBDIR as part of postprocess for those to be later included
> > > > into the final base-apt by do_cache.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vijai Kumar K <Vijaikumar_Kanagarajan@mentor.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > meta/classes/image.bbclass | 2 +-
> > > > meta/classes/rootfs.bbclass | 46
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 47
> > > > insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/meta/classes/image.bbclass
> > > > b/meta/classes/image.bbclass index 9fa58f8..1c7a527 100644
> > > > --- a/meta/classes/image.bbclass
> > > > +++ b/meta/classes/image.bbclass
> > > > @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ image_do_mounts() {
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > ROOTFSDIR = "${IMAGE_ROOTFS}"
> > > > -ROOTFS_FEATURES += "copy-package-cache clean-package-cache
> > > > generate-manifest" +ROOTFS_FEATURES += "copy-package-cache
> > > > clean-package-cache generate-manifest cache-deb-src"
> > > > ROOTFS_PACKAGES += "${IMAGE_PREINSTALL} ${IMAGE_INSTALL}"
> > > > ROOTFS_MANIFEST_DEPLOY_DIR ?= "${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}"
> > > > diff --git a/meta/classes/rootfs.bbclass
> > > > b/meta/classes/rootfs.bbclass index 8bb003d..7bfdfc9 100644
> > > > --- a/meta/classes/rootfs.bbclass
> > > > +++ b/meta/classes/rootfs.bbclass
> > > > @@ -201,6 +201,52 @@ rootfs_generate_manifest () {
> > > > ${ROOTFS_MANIFEST_DEPLOY_DIR}/"${PF}".manifest
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND +=
> > > > "${@bb.utils.contains('ROOTFS_FEATURES', 'cache-deb-src',
> > > > 'cache_deb_src', '', d)}" +cache_deb_src() {
> > > > + if [ "${ISAR_USE_CACHED_BASE_REPO}" = "1" ]; then
> > > > + return 0
> > > > + fi
> > >
> > > Should the source packages not all end up in the cache, so they can
> > > and probably should be fetched from there.
> >
> > Sorry. But I am not able to understand this. Can you please explain
> > it again?
>
> A first build without the cache will fetch all sources and drop them
> into "${DEBSRCDIR}"/"${DISTRO}", just the the apt:// fetcher does.
> A second build with an enabled cache will place all those src-pkgs in
> base-apt (see populate_base_apt repo_add_srcpackage loop).
>
> So a second run of this function here should be able to fetch all those
> srcs-pkgs from base-apt. And it would be a good idea to actually do
> that to prove that everything is available offline.
>
> Note that for real offline BB_NO_NETWORK would be required. And that
> "guard" should still be able to download from base-apt. Thinking about
> it again ... i think you do not need the guard. If all src-pkgs are
> available offline this function will never access the internet, if it
> still tries the invalid proxy "guard" from isar_export_proxies will
> trigger.
>
> I think it boils down to removing the
> [ "${ISAR_USE_CACHED_BASE_REPO}" = "1" ] && exit 0
> and passing the ci offline/cache test
>
> > >
> > > > + mkdir -p "${DEBSRCDIR}"/"${DISTRO}"
> > > > +
> > > > + sudo -s <<'EOSUDO'
> > > > + cp -L /etc/resolv.conf '${ROOTFSDIR}/etc'
> > > > + mkdir -p '${ROOTFSDIR}/deb-src'
> > > > + mountpoint -q '${ROOTFSDIR}/deb-src' || \
> > > > + mount --bind '${DEBSRCDIR}' '${ROOTFSDIR}/deb-src'
> > > > +EOSUDO
> > > > +
> > > > + sudo -E chroot ${ROOTFSDIR} /usr/bin/apt-get update
>
> Why is that in here? Doing this in the image is not allowed, only for
> isar-apt!
Hi Henning,
I am sorry. But why is it not allowed? Am I missing any side effects of this
call?
Thanks,
Vijai Kumar K
>
> > > > + find "${DEBDIR}"/"${DISTRO}" -name '*\.deb' | while read
> > > > package; do
>
> You are reading this without grabbing the lock. In multiconfig other
> images might be filling that directory as you read it. And you might be
> calling dpkg-deb on half copied files.
>
> Try deb_dl_dir_import and looping over /var/cache/apt/archives/ ... in
> which case you will find yourself dealing with isar-apt packages that
> you need to skip.
> In fact you should use the manifest as input to not download packages
> installed in other images with the same distro but without the feature.
>
> Yeahh multiconfig!
>
> Henning
>
> > > > + local src="$( dpkg-deb --show --showformat '${Source}'
> > > > "${package}" )"
> > > > + # If the binary package version and source package
> > > > version are different, then the
> > > > + # source package version will be present inside "()" of
> > > > the Source field.
> > > > + local version="$( echo "$src" | cut -sd "(" -f2 | cut -sd
> > > > ")" -f1 )"
> > > > + if [ -z ${version} ]; then
> > > > + version="$( dpkg-deb --show --showformat '${Version}'
> > > > "${package}" )"
> > > > + fi
> > > > + # Now strip any version information that might be
> > > > available.
> > > > + src="$( echo "$src" | cut -d' ' -f1 )"
> > > > + # If there is no source field, then the source package
> > > > has the same name as the
> > > > + # binary package.
> > > > + if [ -z "${src}" ];then
> > > > + src="$( dpkg-deb --show --showformat '${Package}'
> > > > "${package}" )"
> > > > + fi
> > > > +
> > > > + sudo -E chroot --userspec=$( id -u ):$( id -g )
> > > > ${ROOTFSDIR} \
> > > > + sh -c 'mkdir -p "/deb-src/${1}/${2}" && cd
> > > > "/deb-src/${1}/${2}" && \
> > > > + apt-get -y --download-only --only-source source
> > > > "$2"="$3"' \
> > > > + download-src "${DISTRO}" "${src}" "${version}"
> > > > + done
> > >
> > > Looks like we are going online without proxy configuration here. It
> > > also needs a BB_NO_NETWORK guard.
> >
> > Will take care of that.
> >
> > >
> > > And i would suggest to generate the list of things you want to
> > > fetch, factor out the fetcher from dpkg-base and reuse is instead
> > > of copying it.
> >
> > Sure. I will have a look into how I can reuse that part.
> >
> > >
> > > And i would personally like a new series of patches to be sent
> > > without "in-reply-to". Maybe its my client but i find these deeply
> > > nested threads very hard to follow.
> >
> > No Problem. Will send the next series separately.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Vijai Kumar K
> >
> > >
> > > Henning
> > >
> > > > + sudo -s <<'EOSUDO'
> > > > + mountpoint -q '${ROOTFSDIR}/deb-src' && \
> > > > + umount -l ${ROOTFSDIR}/deb-src
> > > > + rm -rf '${ROOTFSDIR}/etc/resolv.conf'
> > > > +EOSUDO
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > do_rootfs_postprocess[vardeps] = "${ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND}"
> > > > python do_rootfs_postprocess() {
> > > > # Take care that its correctly mounted:
> > >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-15 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-06 14:06 [PATCH] rootfs: Make rootfs_postprocess_finalize the last step Vijai Kumar K
2020-02-06 17:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-02-06 17:47 ` vijai kumar
2020-02-06 18:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-02-06 18:28 ` vijai kumar
2020-02-10 5:37 ` [PATCH v2] rootfs: Make rootfs finalize a separate task Vijai Kumar K
2020-02-11 11:38 ` Henning Schild
2020-02-11 14:14 ` vijai kumar
2020-02-11 15:20 ` Henning Schild
2020-02-11 18:07 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-02-13 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Vijai Kumar K
2020-02-13 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] meta: cache deb srcs as part of postprocessing Vijai Kumar K
2020-02-14 5:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] rootfs: Make rootfs finalize a separate task Vijai Kumar K
2020-02-14 5:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] meta: cache deb srcs as part of postprocessing Vijai Kumar K
2020-02-14 8:19 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-02-14 8:41 ` vijai kumar
2020-02-14 8:45 ` vijai kumar
2020-03-11 7:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] rootfs: Make rootfs finalize a separate task vijai kumar
2020-04-01 7:25 ` vijai kumar
2020-04-01 8:19 ` Henning Schild
2020-04-01 10:29 ` vijai kumar
2020-04-03 6:50 ` vijai kumar
2020-04-03 8:30 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2020-04-03 8:50 ` vijai kumar
2020-04-03 13:05 ` [PATCH v4 " Vijai Kumar K
2020-04-03 13:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] meta: cache deb srcs as part of postprocessing Vijai Kumar K
2020-04-07 6:44 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-04-07 6:58 ` vijai kumar
2020-04-07 7:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-04-07 7:59 ` vijai kumar
2020-04-07 8:38 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-04-07 9:08 ` vijai kumar
2020-04-07 9:40 ` vijai kumar
2020-04-08 8:13 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2020-04-08 10:04 ` vijai kumar
2020-04-08 13:32 ` vijai kumar
2020-04-15 6:44 ` vijai kumar
2020-04-15 7:28 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-04-15 13:20 ` vijai kumar
2020-04-15 13:44 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-04-08 10:04 ` Henning Schild
2020-04-08 10:37 ` vijai kumar
2020-04-08 12:30 ` Henning Schild
2020-04-15 12:29 ` vijai kumar [this message]
2020-04-15 18:19 ` Henning Schild
2020-04-16 15:57 ` vijai kumar
2020-04-16 17:29 ` Henning Schild
2020-04-07 6:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] rootfs: Make rootfs finalize a separate task vijai kumar
2020-04-07 6:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-04-07 6:53 ` vijai kumar
2020-04-07 7:12 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2020-04-07 8:04 ` vijai kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALLGG_+qawggJT4GG92HUuxZH5jyDny+r2o0J-_vADXksbkffQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=vijaikumar.kanagarajan@gmail.com \
--cc=Vijaikumar_Kanagarajan@mentor.com \
--cc=henning.schild@siemens.com \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox