From: <Adithya.Balakumar@toshiba-tsip.com>
To: <isar-users@googlegroups.com>
Cc: <dinesh.kumar@toshiba-tsip.com>, <Shivanand.Kunijadar@toshiba-tsip.com>
Subject: ROOTFS_SIZE changes between multiple builds
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 14:30:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <TYCPR01MB96690E9E6A549BA1116642BBC4DE2@TYCPR01MB9669.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2305 bytes --]
Hi All,
I have been recently working on reproducible builds for a downstream project (isar-cip-core).
On that effort, I came across a behavior with the ROOTFS_SIZE variable. Sometimes I see that when I build 2 images to check for reproducibility, the value of the ROOTFS_SIZE variable changes between builds. The variation usually only by a few KB's and this behavior is not seen quite often either. At the moment I am not sure about the cause of this problem, Hence posting here seeking suggestions from the rest of you.
I tried checking the rootfs contents, but the contents are identical despite the difference in the size of the rootfs directory.
I am trying to understand this for the following reasons:
1. In the case where no size parameter is set for a partition in the wks file, wic estimates the rootfs size from the rootfs directory in WORKDIR, See [1]. When the rootfs size is different for the 2 builds, the resulting filesystem images are also different (in the case that I encountered, the 2 ext4 filesystem images are off by a few blocks).
2. While creating an ext4 filesystem images with the IMAGE_CMD of isar, the filesystem images are created based the ROOTFS_SIZE. In the scenario where ROOTFS_SIZE are the different, the resultant filesystem images are also non-reproducible. See [2]
With regards to point 2 above, that maybe a different topic as there are other problems in achieving reproducibility of ext4 filesystem images, like support for file timestamp clamping to SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH was only recently added to mkfs.ext4 (v1.47.1)
Would like to understand if anyone here has come across such a scenario / any pointers on how to get to the root cause?
[1] https://github.com/ilbers/isar/blob/master/scripts/lib/wic/partition.py#L242
[2] https://github.com/ilbers/isar/blob/master/meta/classes/imagetypes.bbclass#L19
Thanks and Regards,
Adithya Balakumar
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "isar-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to isar-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/isar-users/TYCPR01MB96690E9E6A549BA1116642BBC4DE2%40TYCPR01MB9669.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4466 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-04 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-04 14:30 Adithya.Balakumar [this message]
2024-07-16 5:06 ` Adithya.Balakumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=TYCPR01MB96690E9E6A549BA1116642BBC4DE2@TYCPR01MB9669.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com \
--to=adithya.balakumar@toshiba-tsip.com \
--cc=Shivanand.Kunijadar@toshiba-tsip.com \
--cc=dinesh.kumar@toshiba-tsip.com \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox