From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6740510031426355200 X-Received: by 2002:adf:e988:: with SMTP id h8mr9059305wrm.354.1569414592921; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 05:29:52 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:adf:828e:: with SMTP id 14ls2158814wrc.7.gmail; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 05:29:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzKn2qcRshVXOdRpB1rdjynioPb3bzk5Cx86BdWIVI9PIL8orp5fULw/G1qHIGLQEIuuUcG X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4d87:: with SMTP id b7mr9743693wru.148.1569414592449; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 05:29:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1569414592; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ih32hBduEAsW1/3xLteZ+Jjh4kARGf0bSF8dcymi96LRi/eqlcwl5Opgai+J/EqAOK PDqCu+8n5cF3nCbAUhdgfmYsQkDCZsKnh+ZkXVKNdEUZMCSrxMvNFTbcc8M2Ow0Jguzr mmiRb9RLyEtRNPoHXeinbfmcES5/XIa92O2cDRm7IglJ6KamalrwWzwdNuc7uGWGLjB/ +9D9882YWSkjbiBHass2oR797uEQpRUvZ4POo8ktIql/pyZJjQVGO1Tz4tpn5JuCICJ+ Ep/gBhdIhQNfgLlFuUdAvKydTPIkvsMgzmoIygxzgkRPBRVOvzIen8E3WP9PcwKOQV+K uzog== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:to:subject; bh=G/s8Hhpn9zhA59vd3hRhg+q5PTGmcYk05iLZpKdTHKU=; b=0/vMUWZWDK5Mv7KhuV84MzZcZbUEeGN6Mml8d+sqxKF1X92++uqs46Vb1OSQ1d8XcL nnV2g/WluZAnHkpQgGQ/wL/sEnDZFmyZ9t9OE+74aDDsZCXyIjMPydn+XY/kP9qxRtpv Z4uV3EUzr4YYSg7vnfvY6fHgf8HhcX/bfj63+4WwVP/w5OzLbwYwc9LD08G/NhrZkjeQ ph7oE6kMyR6ThtyRIEAmh1+xOCj0aGly0oWEIfXD7XNVpG/wcX3ONy94vBT7TGc9iXQ1 dlgrKZmay52I+BEZE1oY+iXe1P0OJIHPhAbzrxXslSRYHCqO3cGQagpArjnxwlTepCDC oQUw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.14 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jan.kiszka@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de. [192.35.17.14]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r3si394259eds.2.2019.09.25.05.29.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 05:29:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.14 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.35.17.14; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.14 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jan.kiszka@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: from mail1.sbs.de (mail1.sbs.de [192.129.41.35]) by david.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8PCTpTS011805 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:29:52 +0200 Received: from [139.25.68.37] (md1q0hnc.ad001.siemens.net [139.25.68.37] (may be forged)) by mail1.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8PCTpIp015766 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:29:51 +0200 Subject: Re: Discussion: Base-apt features To: isar-users@googlegroups.com References: <20190925074122.GA12490@lightning> <20190925102607.cpvf6wurb4orwigx@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <5e7ef571-512e-f033-6c94-e7f8beaec469@denx.de> <20190925121922.43kgzt52pmcgkaui@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> From: Jan Kiszka Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:29:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190925121922.43kgzt52pmcgkaui@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: s8SoqjINgbo4 On 25.09.19 14:19, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 01:56:37PM +0200, Claudius Heine wrote: >>>>> 2. Support for using password protected keys. >> Right. It would just be inconvenient to switch between those >> configurations for the different use cases that should be satisfiable >> simultaneously without change of configuration files or deleting build >> results. >> >> I am currently not using Isar, but is something like this possible? >> >> BASE_REPO_KEY = "" bitbake ... >> BASE_REPO_KEY = "prod.key" bitbake ... > > That would be indeed convenient. We could look whether bitbake supports that. > It's there some env-variable whitelisting for such scenarios? Jan > >>>>> 4. Support for adding packages only to base-apt. >> >> Two departments of the same company, one that develops debian bin and >> possible src packages and deploys them to a internal repo for other >> departments to use, and the other department that takes these packages >> and installs them to an image for the customer. Those packages are not >> build by isar then and would be placed in the base-apt repo together >> with the src package for delivery to the end-customer, which might not >> be what was desired. >> >> We should probably just check the license and only deliver packages that >> are required to be redistributed. > > Thanks for the scenario, we could consider covering this in some way. > > > With kind regards, > Baurzhan. > -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux