public inbox for isar-users@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: "[ext] Claudius Heine" <claudius.heine.ext@siemens.com>,
	isar-users <isar-users@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Deprecating Raspberry Pi
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:48:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a66e7108-2398-e502-7408-40102f405a8f@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86465cf4-3351-e1f4-d502-f2c499e28aa4@siemens.com>

On 11.02.19 13:41, [ext] Claudius Heine wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> is anybody currently using Isar to build for Raspberry Pi?
> 

Likely not on Raspbian, I would guess. We do have a pending request to enable 
the RPi3 with Isar, but that is a different topic.

> If that target is not maintained and used, then I would be in favor of removing 
> it from meta-isar.
> 
> I just tried to boot the 'isar-image-base.rpi-sdimg' image of the current next 
> branch (d88c739323ecdecc) on a Raspberry Pi 1 without success.

The RPi1 is probably also an uninteresting target by now.

> 
> Currently RPi support with jessie is holding us back to deprecate jessie and 
> removing the loop mounts that is required by the old versions of mkfs.ext4. So I 
> would be in favor of eigher removing RPi1 support or switching to stretch with 
> that, if there are maintainers that regularly test if booting works.

Keeping a non-Debian target would have the value to stress our abstractions. But 
that only works if the target is recent enough (Stretch or newer), frequently 
built and run as well.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-11 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-11 12:41 Claudius Heine
2019-02-11 12:48 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2019-02-11 13:30   ` Claudius Heine
2019-02-11 13:51 ` [PATCH] remove raspberry support claudius.heine.ext
2019-02-11 14:03   ` Jan Kiszka
2019-02-12  9:30     ` [PATCH v2] remove RaspberryPi support claudius.heine.ext
2019-02-12 11:39       ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-02-12 12:41         ` Claudius Heine
2019-02-12 16:40           ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-02-12 16:49             ` Claudius Heine
2019-02-17 10:16               ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-02-11 14:03 ` [Discussion] Deprecating Raspberry Pi Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-02-11 14:11   ` Claudius Heine
2019-02-11 14:27     ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-02-11 15:17       ` Claudius Heine
2019-02-17 10:44 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2019-02-18  8:44   ` Claudius Heine

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a66e7108-2398-e502-7408-40102f405a8f@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=claudius.heine.ext@siemens.com \
    --cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox