Re: Decide on official Isar release cycle

[Baurzhan Ismagulov <ibr@radix50.net>]

On 2025-12-16 12:36, 'Jan Kiszka' via isar-users wrote:
> > We could think about starting with two releases per year, gaining experience
> > (esp. regarding larger code changes) and seeing which effort it requires.
> 
> That's the absolute minimum, but will likely not change a lot
> downstream, at least as long as we find too many issues via the
> downstream layers, thus potentially to late for a release.

Ok, let me understand.

cip-core wants quarterly Isar releases -- good to know.
What is the cycle?

Do I understand correctly, if Isar would do quarterly releases, cip-core would
use Isar tags?
Then it would go downstream, Isar issues would be found and fixed (which
suggests extending Isar testsuite).
Is your point that the next Isar release a quarter later would be soon enough
for the downstreams?

In any case, we could still try 1.1 in 2026-Q3 and then revisit this topic.

With kind regards,
Baurzhan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "isar-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to isar-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/isar-users/aUFQQHaBVLXEtIdF%40abai.de.