From: "MOESSBAUER, Felix" <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>
To: "isar-users@googlegroups.com" <isar-users@googlegroups.com>
Cc: "Kiszka, Jan" <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
"Koch, Stefan" <stefan-koch@siemens.com>
Subject: custom-kernel headers: scripts are wrong architecture
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 20:37:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b600f17be7d35058705025706328389e509a097c.camel@siemens.com> (raw)
Dear devs,
while debugging a broken non-cross kernel module build, I found that
there is a more generic issue about our linux-headers-${KERNEL_NAME}
package: It might contain the kernel scripts (ELF binaries) in the
wrong architecture. This only happens if the kernel itself is cross-
compiled.
Let's consider the following example, where we compile for a debian
bookworm arm64 target. We further look at the 'fixdeps' script from the
kernel tools (required during kmod builds).
Example 1 (stock kernel):
The script is located in package linux-kbuild-6.1 (dependency of linux-
headers-<...>).
- file /usr/lib/linux-kbuild-6.1/scripts/basic/fixdep: ELF 64-bit LSB
pie executable, ARM aarch64, ...
- linux-headers-arm64 : arm64
- linux-kbuild-6.1 : arm64
Example 2 (custom kernel):
- file /usr/src/linux-headers-6.1.54-cip6-rt3/scripts/basic/fixdep: ELF
64-bit LSB pie executable, x86-64
- linux-headers-iot2050-rt : arm64
In example 2, the kmod build is obviously broken, as the emulated build
will not be able to execute the x64 binary. Also, in an :arm64 package,
there must be no foreign architecture binaries.
This behavior can also be reproduced, by cross-compiling a target with
a custom kernel and disabling the cross-build for a module, using
ISAR_CROSS_COMPILE="0" in the module build recipe.
It would be great, if someone could have a look there. At a first
glance, this issue looks closely related to "linux-custom: Split up
binaries from kernel headers to kbuild packages". Maybe Stefan can
comment on this as well.
PS: This bug was uncovered today, as the cross-build of a kernel module
on debian bookworm arm64 is currently broken in upstream debian. I
already reported this bug in [1].
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061075
Best regards,
Felix
--
Siemens AG, Technology
Linux Expert Center
next reply other threads:[~2024-01-17 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-17 20:37 MOESSBAUER, Felix [this message]
2024-01-18 7:52 ` Jan Kiszka
2024-01-18 9:41 ` MOESSBAUER, Felix
2024-01-18 9:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2024-01-18 9:59 ` Koch, Stefan
2024-04-30 16:54 ` Koch, Stefan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b600f17be7d35058705025706328389e509a097c.camel@siemens.com \
--to=felix.moessbauer@siemens.com \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=stefan-koch@siemens.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox