public inbox for isar-users@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Smirnov <asmirnov@ilbers.de>
To: Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>
Cc: isar-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: Add technical overview
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 17:44:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b697fcbb-1fb9-cac7-eac7-61a710021f9c@ilbers.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170808163845.03fc807c@md1em3qc>



On 08/08/2017 05:38 PM, Henning Schild wrote:
> Am Tue, 8 Aug 2017 16:12:02 +0300
> schrieb Alexander Smirnov <asmirnov@ilbers.de>:
> 
>> On 08/08/2017 04:03 PM, Henning Schild wrote:
>>> Am Tue, 8 Aug 2017 15:41:10 +0300
>>> schrieb Alexander Smirnov <asmirnov@ilbers.de>:
>>>    
>>>> On 08/08/2017 02:54 PM, Henning Schild wrote:
>>>>> Am Tue, 8 Aug 2017 14:32:00 +0300
>>>>> schrieb Alexander Smirnov <asmirnov@ilbers.de>:
>>>>>       
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 08/08/2017 02:11 PM, Henning Schild wrote:
>>>>>>> I did not really read this yet. At the moment i think we have
>>>>>>> too many changes in the q to add such a document to the
>>>>>>> repository. Any change would just mean heaving to keep it up to
>>>>>>> date. We talked about the need for such a document for the
>>>>>>> possible OE integration. I think it is valuable for that
>>>>>>> already.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Briefly speaking, this document describes initial motivation and
>>>>>> high-level current overview.
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>> That should be added after we all are happy with the feature-set
>>>>>>> of Isar, until then it would just be another file to update when
>>>>>>> changing how things work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm, this document doesn't affect any discussions about Isar
>>>>>> feature set. It's intended to be as technical background for
>>>>>> hot-plug joining to this project. During discussions last month I
>>>>>> see that we have gap in our understandings how Isar works, so
>>>>>> this document should be start point to eliminate such gaps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For sure, it's *not* a specification, which explicitly defines
>>>>>> specific feature set and nothing more will be added. It's just an
>>>>>> explanation of current state. I see no problems to regularly
>>>>>> update it, moreover I highly appreciate this. Lack of
>>>>>> documentation is the most common problem of open source
>>>>>> projects, so as soon we start documenting the things, the easier
>>>>>> will be documentation maintenance in future.
>>>>>
>>>>> For sure we need that! But especially section 3 contains lots of
>>>>> interna that will change if my patches get accepted. That is why i
>>>>> would like to postpone adding the file after my patches went in.
>>>>
>>>> As I said, this document describes current project state, so I
>>>> don't think that upcoming changes should block publishing of
>>>> documentation.
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>>
>>>>> Adding that file before them would mean another rebase round for
>>>>> documentation. I would be happy to rebase this one for you on top
>>>>> of a master that contains my stuff, but not too happy about the
>>>>> other way around.
>>>>
>>>> The patch creates document from the scratch, so it can't conflict
>>>> with any upcoming patches.
>>>
>>> It conflicts with other patches that are under review right now.
>>> All i am asking is to merge conflicting patches in the order the
>>> patches initially showed up for review, in that case this one comes
>>> last anyways. And when its time has come it will be outdated, and i
>>> will update it for you.
>>>    
>>
>> Hmm, are you speaking about exactly this patch or about previous
>> series?
> 
> Section 3.4 and 3.5 conflict with my changes, they will have to be
> changed. If your patch comes first i would have to rebase.
> 
> i.e.
> - 3.4 talks about dpkg.bbclass which i renamed
> [PATCH 11-16 of 16 v2 4/6]
> - 3.5 will not happen anymore if everything enters the rootfs through
>    multistrap
> [PATCH 3/3] classes: image: remove populate and replace it with a
> custom repo

I didn't get the idea, how this affects your patches? After your 
features will be applied, you can update this document. In this thread 
you've mentioned, that this patch breaks your series and force you to 
perform rebase, this point is not clear for me.

> 
> 
> Henning
> 
> 
>> Alex
>>
>>>> Also I expect, that the author of new features will update the
>>>> documentation, so some reference document should be published
>>>> anyway.
>>>
>>> Sure.
>>>    
>>>> To be honest I'm not happy with the idea that I'll document all the
>>>> new features in future.
>>>
>>> Missing or inconsistent documentation are a valid reason to not
>>> accept a patch so it will not come to that.
>>>
>>> Henning
>>>    
>>>> Alex
>>>>   
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am Tue, 8 Aug 2017 13:05:59 +0300
>>>>>>> schrieb Alexander Smirnov <asmirnov@ilbers.de>:
>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>> Add initial Isar technical overview.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Smirnov <asmirnov@ilbers.de>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>      doc/technical_overview.md | 110
>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed,
>>>>>>>> 110 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/technical_overview.md
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/doc/technical_overview.md
>>>>>>>> b/doc/technical_overview.md new file mode 100644
>>>>>>>> index 0000000..f65fc08
>>>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>>>> +++ b/doc/technical_overview.md
>>>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
>>>>>>>> +# 1 Introduction
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +Isar can be shortly described as a set of bitbake recipes that
>>>>>>>> implement main build system logic. To simplify overall Isar
>>>>>>>> understanding, this document is split into two main parts:
>>>>>>>> + - Isar logical components
>>>>>>>> + - Isar internal processes
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +# 2 Isar Logical Components
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +In this chapter the most important Isar components are
>>>>>>>> considered in details. In this text component doesn't
>>>>>>>> especially mean some self-contained single entity of
>>>>>>>> something, it's just an attempt to split Isar internals by
>>>>>>>> various criteria. + +### 2.1 Bitbake and Recipes + +All the
>>>>>>>> processes in Isar are started by bitbake, so it manages
>>>>>>>> general build executing process. Recipes in Isar can be split
>>>>>>>> in two categories: +
>>>>>>>> + - System recipes and classes: they are responsible for
>>>>>>>> setting up Debian-like infrastructure, manages Debian tools
>>>>>>>> execution for package building and installation, generation
>>>>>>>> root file system images
>>>>>>>> + - User recipes: custom user applications, that should be
>>>>>>>> builе from sources +
>>>>>>>> +There are two types of dependencies in Isar:
>>>>>>>> + - Dependency between bitbake recipes
>>>>>>>> + - Dependencies in Debian filesystem
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +**NOTE:** Isar doesn't manage dependencies in Debian file
>>>>>>>> systems. User can only list specific Debian dependencies in
>>>>>>>> recipe, so they eventually will be passed to apt-get or
>>>>>>>> multistrap. Dependency installation is managed by Debian tools.
>>>>>>>> + +### 2.2 Stamps + +Each task managed by bitbake uses stamp to
>>>>>>>> notify that it has been completed. Due to Isar supports various
>>>>>>>> Debian distributions and parallel builds for multiple machines
>>>>>>>> and architectures, the stamps for tasks use special suffixes
>>>>>>>> that include:
>>>>>>>> + - Debian distro name
>>>>>>>> + - Architecture
>>>>>>>> + - Machine
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +Typical example, when Isar builds the following
>>>>>>>> configurations:
>>>>>>>> + - Debian Jessie, amd64
>>>>>>>> + - Debian Jessie, i386
>>>>>>>> + - Debian Stretch, i386
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +In this case there will be 3 different buildchroots, so
>>>>>>>> standard hello demo application should be processed 3 times
>>>>>>>> for each environment. Three different sets of stamps should be
>>>>>>>> used for correct bitbake operating. + +### 2.3 Buildchroot +
>>>>>>>> +One of the key aspect of Debian philosophy claims the fact,
>>>>>>>> that everything in Debian should be built within Debian
>>>>>>>> environment. Moreover native compilation is more preferable
>>>>>>>> than cross-compilation. To follow this rules, Isar introduces
>>>>>>>> the new component - buildchroot. Bulidchroot is typical Debian
>>>>>>>> filesystem that is created using standard Debian tools:
>>>>>>>> multistrap, apt. The source of packages can be either official
>>>>>>>> Debian repositories or custom repositories created by user. +
>>>>>>>> +Buildchroot lifecycle can be described as following:
>>>>>>>> + - Buildchroot has initial configuration file which is passed
>>>>>>>> to multistrap tool. This configuration file is generated by
>>>>>>>> bitbake recipe from patterns and values defined by user. Based
>>>>>>>> on this configuration file, multistrap generates initial
>>>>>>>> filesystem.
>>>>>>>> + - During building custom Debian package, list of its build
>>>>>>>> dependencies is installed to buildchroot.
>>>>>>>> + - When package has been built, it's installed to current
>>>>>>>> buildchroot to satisfy further packages build dependencies. +
>>>>>>>> +### 2.4 Target Root Filesystem
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +Target filesystem is quite similar to buildchroot. The only
>>>>>>>> difference is that it doesn't have development packages
>>>>>>>> installed.
>>>>>>>> + +Target filesystem lifecycle can be described as following:
>>>>>>>> + - Target filesystem has initial configuration file which is
>>>>>>>> passed to multistrap tool. This configuration file is generated
>>>>>>>> by bitbake recipe from patterns and values defined by user.
>>>>>>>> Based on this configuration file, multistrap generates initial
>>>>>>>> filesystem.
>>>>>>>> + - According to the list of custom packages in bitbake
>>>>>>>> recipes, the initial filesystem will be populated by
>>>>>>>> successfully built packages. + +# 3 Isar Internal Processes
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +### 3.1 General Overview
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +Whole Isar build process can be split into the following
>>>>>>>> steps:
>>>>>>>> + - Generation of initial buildchroots for each configuration
>>>>>>>> (Debian distro, machine and architecture) requested by user.
>>>>>>>> + - Generation of initial target filesystems for each
>>>>>>>> configuration.
>>>>>>>> + - Building custom packages.
>>>>>>>> + - Populate target filesystems.
>>>>>>>> + - Generate bootable images.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +All these steps are described in details below.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +### 3.2 Initial Buildchroot Generation
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +As mentioned above, initial buildchroot is generated using
>>>>>>>> multistrap. The bitbake recipe which is responsible for
>>>>>>>> buildchroot can be found here:
>>>>>>>> `meta/recipes-devtools/buildchroot/buildchroot.bb`
>>>>>>>> + +This recipe implementes `do_build` task which performs the
>>>>>>>> following: +1. Generates multistrap config from template:
>>>>>>>> `meta/recipes-devtools/buildchroot/files/multistrap.conf.in`
>>>>>>>> +2. Install pre/post scripts for multistrap:
>>>>>>>> `meta/recipes-devtools/buildchroot/files/configscript.sh` and
>>>>>>>> `meta/recipes-devtools/buildchroot/files/setup.sh` +3. Run
>>>>>>>> multistrap +4. Install script for building custom Debian
>>>>>>>> packages: `meta/recipes-devtools/buildchroot/files/build.sh` +
>>>>>>>> +The single stamp is created for each user buildchroot
>>>>>>>> configuration. + +### 3.3 Initial Target Filesystem Generation
>>>>>>>> + +Initial target filesystem generation process is very
>>>>>>>> similar to buildchroot creating, the difference is only in
>>>>>>>> initial packages list. + +Target image recipes are the part of
>>>>>>>> Isar core. There is a sample of typical Isar image that can be
>>>>>>>> customized according to the user requirements:
>>>>>>>> `meta-isar/recipes-core/images/isar-image-base.bb` +Like for
>>>>>>>> buildchroot, the multistrap configuration files for image can
>>>>>>>> be found here: `meta-isar/recipes-core/images/files`, and it
>>>>>>>> implements `do_build` task. + +### 3.4 Building Custom Packages
>>>>>>>> + +Isar provides possibility to build Debian packages from
>>>>>>>> sources. This features works with Debian-like source packages,
>>>>>>>> i.e. the source code tree should contain debian folder. The
>>>>>>>> build process is implemented in `meta/classes/dpkg.bbclass` and
>>>>>>>> consists from the following steps: +1. Task `do_fetch`: fetch
>>>>>>>> source code from external link +2. Task `do_unpack`: unpack
>>>>>>>> source code to `${BUILDCHROOT_DIR}/home/build/${PN}` +3. Task
>>>>>>>> `do_build`: switch to buildchroot using chroot command and run
>>>>>>>> `build.sh` script. The `build.sh` script performs the
>>>>>>>> following:
>>>>>>>> +   1. Go to `/home/build/${PN}`
>>>>>>>> +   2. Get list of dependencies from debian/control and install
>>>>>>>> them using apt.
>>>>>>>> +   3. Run dpkg-buildpackage
>>>>>>>> +4. Task `do_install`: install successfully built packages
>>>>>>>> `${BUILDCHROOT_DIR}/home/build/${PN}/*.deb` to deploy directory
>>>>>>>> `${DEPLOY_DIR_DEB}` + +### 3.5 Populate Target Filesystem
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +Each target image can be extended by custom packages listed in
>>>>>>>> IMAGE_INSTALL variable. Task `do_populate` performs the
>>>>>>>> following: +1. Parse IMAGE_INSTALL variable +2. Find respective
>>>>>>>> packages in `${DEPLOY_DIR_DEB}` +3. Copy them to deb folder in
>>>>>>>> dedicated target filesystem +4. Execute dpkg command in chroot
>>>>>>>> for all the copied packages +
>>>>>>>> +### 3.6 Generate Bootable Image
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +This process contains the following steps:
>>>>>>>> +1. Task `do_ext4_image`: target filesystem is packed to extfs
>>>>>>>> image +2. wic tool generates bootable image for dedicated
>>>>>>>> platform
>>>>>>>          
>>>>>       
>>>>   
>>>    
>>
> 

-- 
With best regards,
Alexander Smirnov

ilbers GmbH
Baierbrunner Str. 28c
D-81379 Munich
+49 (89) 122 67 24-0
http://ilbers.de/
Commercial register Munich, HRB 214197
General manager: Baurzhan Ismagulov

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-08 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-08 10:05 Alexander Smirnov
2017-08-08 11:11 ` Henning Schild
2017-08-08 11:32   ` Alexander Smirnov
2017-08-08 11:54     ` Henning Schild
2017-08-08 12:41       ` Alexander Smirnov
2017-08-08 13:03         ` Henning Schild
2017-08-08 13:12           ` Alexander Smirnov
2017-08-08 14:38             ` Henning Schild
2017-08-08 14:44               ` Alexander Smirnov [this message]
2017-08-08 14:53                 ` Henning Schild
2017-08-08 15:21                   ` Alexander Smirnov
2017-08-08 11:46   ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2017-08-08 11:55 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2017-08-22 10:40 ` Baurzhan Ismagulov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b697fcbb-1fb9-cac7-eac7-61a710021f9c@ilbers.de \
    --to=asmirnov@ilbers.de \
    --cc=henning.schild@siemens.com \
    --cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox