public inbox for isar-users@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>
Cc: isar-users <isar-users@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] meta-isar: hello: Use <orig-version> in CHANGELOG_V
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 19:55:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd9cd6f9-5639-3d6e-d434-4399d1347d14@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200605194658.74038f63@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net>

On 05.06.20 19:46, Henning Schild wrote:
> Jan,
> 
> this is what i talked about earlier. Not sure about the details anymore
> but never got a reply.
> 

Yes, I think I forgot to write a reply here:

I think we are still (luckily) talking about two things here. One, the
templating of the changelog with some "original" or whatever version is
done and remains useful. The other, processing of arbitrarily versioned
debian source packages is still a separate todo.

What is missing to build a tracking deb package rebuilder is extraction
of the debian source package to a stable path so that S can refer to
that without knowing the version in advance (which would be impossible).
We basically need to detect what do_apt_fetch unpacked and rename that
to comply with S. Can we tell "apt-get source" which directory to create
(rather than <package-name>-<upstream-version>? Didn't find anything.

Jan

> Henning
> 
> Am Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:51:49 +0200
> schrieb "[ext] Henning Schild" <henning.schild@siemens.com>:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> here some notes on a PV pattern for "tracking"
>>
>> - choose a pattern that bitbake can order in case of multiple recipes
>>   for one package release < master < next
>>   2.0 < 9999 < 99999, using strings instead of numbers might not allow
>>   bitbake to order
>> - choose a pattern that people see as "tracking"
>> - that PV would only be used in bitbake, the DEBIAN_V would come from
>>   the code and might be partially constructed with isar patchlevels
>> - look at how oe chooses its PV for "tracking", if it does not support
>>   that, look at gentoo
>> - use the pattern across all recipes, no matter how they fetch
>>
>> Henning
>>
>> Am Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:37:20 +0200
>> schrieb "[ext] Henning Schild" <henning.schild@siemens.com>:
>>
>>> Am Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:27:24 +0200
>>> schrieb "[ext] Henning Schild" <henning.schild@siemens.com>:
>>>   
>>>> Am Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:10:07 +0200
>>>> schrieb Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>:
>>>>     
>>>>> On 29.04.20 07:54, Henning Schild wrote:      
>>>>>> Am Tue, 28 Apr 2020 18:01:53 +0200
>>>>>> schrieb Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>:
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>> On 28.04.20 18:00, Henning Schild wrote:        
>>>>>>>> I think with this we might be able to put everything into
>>>>>>>> one .bb. At the moment we have the inc plus two bbs that
>>>>>>>> have PV in their names.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Taking PV from a bb filename is wrong when the inc uses
>>>>>>>> <orig-version>.        
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "We cannot consolidate the recipes carrying the upstream
>>>>>>> versions, though, as that information needs to be propagated
>>>>>>> into ${S}."        
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I read that but did not fully understand it. If we can not do
>>>>>> that or fully do that, does that mean the tracking of
>>>>>> "<orig-version>" can not be fully implemented? Maybe we can
>>>>>> fill the gaps or document them. To me it sounds like a
>>>>>> "half-feature" to introduce orig-version as proposed.        
>>>>>
>>>>> We have two problems to solve here:
>>>>>
>>>>>   - appending to the exact debian version our own suffix when
>>>>> patching it
>>>>>   - tracking the upstream version under which the source package
>>>>> is extracted to so that ${S} is set correctly
>>>>>
>>>>> The former is addressed by my patch to debianize, for the latter
>>>>> I'm lacking a good idea. However, that is generally not a bit
>>>>> issue because Debian does less frequently the update of the
>>>>> major version, often only when switching its own major release.
>>>>> Also, patches you carry are more likely to require adjustments
>>>>> anyway in that case.
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem for setting S is not the version extraction like we
>>>>> do for the changelog. It is that this has to happen rather
>>>>> early - but after recipe parsing where it normally happens. It
>>>>> would require to rewrite do_apt_fetch so that it identifies the
>>>>> path and sets S, somehow.      
>>>>
>>>> But S can be anything, it is a temporary directory ... afaik.
>>>>
>>>> We have S="${WORKDIR}/git", why not have
>>>> S="${WORKDIR}/${PN}-orig-version" ... really that string and no
>>>> substitution later on. Or even PN-42-nobody-cares
>>>>
>>>> I might be wrong, got a little lost in S and D in isar and still
>>>> have those gentoo meanings in my head. But i guess it should be
>>>> the same as in gentoo.    
>>>
>>> gentoo uses PV=9999 for "tracking", the real number will come out of
>>> the code you fetch .. i.e. with git. Some packages require more 9s,
>>> the idea is to have the tracking recipe always be the most recent.
>>> And all those 9s tell devs in the filename that it is the tracking
>>> one. In fact it might even be the "same" recipe there.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/master/net-vpn/openconnect/openconnect-9999.ebuild
>>>
>>> is basically the same as
>>>
>>> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/master/net-vpn/openconnect/openconnect-8.08.ebuild
>>>
>>> So we want to use <orig-version> for when we fetch with apt:// but
>>> we might want a PV-pattern that also covers git fetching or tarball
>>> fetching.
>>>
>>> I.e. in jailhouse the recipe could git fetch the tag when PV looks
>>> like a release. And if PV looks like tracking it could take latest
>>> master or next. Same recipe, just a different filename.
>>>
>>> Whatever works there should be taken for the apt://-fetcher as well,
>>> not different PV pattern depending on the fetcher.
>>>
>>> Henning
>>>   
>>>> Henning
>>>>     
>>>>> Jan
>>>>>       
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Henning
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>>>        
>>>>>>>> Henning
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:29:11 +0200
>>>>>>>> Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>            
>>>>>>>>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Make use of the new placeholder to append "+isar" to the
>>>>>>>>> original version. We cannot consolidate the recipes
>>>>>>>>> carrying the upstream versions, though, as that
>>>>>>>>> information needs to be propagated into ${S}.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Depends on
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/isar-users/ebf1ab25-74ea-b3ba-4c48-2ecac873c6f7%40siemens.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    meta-isar/recipes-app/hello/hello.inc | 2 +-
>>>>>>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/meta-isar/recipes-app/hello/hello.inc
>>>>>>>>> b/meta-isar/recipes-app/hello/hello.inc index
>>>>>>>>> c5f322bb..d81085d8 100644 ---
>>>>>>>>> a/meta-isar/recipes-app/hello/hello.inc +++
>>>>>>>>> b/meta-isar/recipes-app/hello/hello.inc @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
>>>>>>>>> inherit dpkg SRC_URI = "apt://${PN}"
>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>    MAINTAINER = "isar-users <isar-users@googlegroups.com>"
>>>>>>>>> -CHANGELOG_V = "${PV}-99+isar"
>>>>>>>>> +CHANGELOG_V = "<orig-version>+isar"
>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>    do_prepare_build() {
>>>>>>>>>    	deb_add_changelog        
>>>>>>>>            
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>        
>>>>>>         
>>>>>       
>>>>     
>>>   
>>
> 

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-05 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-23 17:29 Jan Kiszka
2020-04-28 16:00 ` Henning Schild
2020-04-28 16:01   ` Jan Kiszka
2020-04-29  5:54     ` Henning Schild
2020-04-29  6:10       ` Jan Kiszka
2020-04-29  6:27         ` Henning Schild
2020-04-29  6:37           ` Henning Schild
2020-04-29  6:51             ` Henning Schild
2020-06-05 17:46               ` Henning Schild
2020-06-05 17:55                 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2020-06-06  8:10                   ` Henning Schild
2020-06-06  8:37                   ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2020-06-08  7:59                     ` Jan Kiszka
2020-05-07 20:09         ` Baurzhan Ismagulov
2020-05-08  6:05           ` Jan Kiszka
2020-05-08  6:13             ` Baurzhan Ismagulov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cd9cd6f9-5639-3d6e-d434-4399d1347d14@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=henning.schild@siemens.com \
    --cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox