From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-GM-THRID: 6812695221159067648 X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2945:: with SMTP id n5mr267119wmd.189.1591987459729; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:44:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com Received: by 2002:a1c:2885:: with SMTP id o127ls2469141wmo.0.canary-gmail; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:44:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzjIqVE70saJIcp10oGz+4rBfWQDxCchetTv4pspzbeeyViMrBYIo0ZJ5z3WBV3KkCIGHs8 X-Received: by 2002:a1c:e389:: with SMTP id a131mr318650wmh.46.1591987459058; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:44:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591987459; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HpPlLYA4L59zKAPPR5wU0U+pii9HuBt0SODekhLvUud0IYQBJFw3UTikE81UDXLMGS xddgJkVn0dHokUNR5G/vBiVrUMJUmLXEBzha7hQUDYtR6G1ZlIoU1mVIkpfvD8e03R7F 4d2AHa2cK/fD2nWqfb5JFwpZZUsgUZ1TZ56y8VW9TO+n7Fq6j8WqGMcrG2Pm51htQZJD hN2rY7t0tedA/CH4w2YXPx26yhR/9OR74jP/V9R3WsGqNBDT8p4SEJXsyqDWixpof9sc f+LlfaBp9VKrMXDq6DgzZgrXRRIzsi4yEQwvbamernruj7p1jvWox+m/fe38zyYAflLq +RkA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=bjrzj2rbbaOREaEmSTyJ0jsC3pZAIVr8z+3yZG29WZs=; b=mQ8y5ulkRAM1G9YbQVJqUK4hgvLVTpBcYqoPWq/o09gBSUpLjJ+CFUb9hJFQV6lzT6 mC0Q0Qb/15O0Gx3Ofdlqfdxnn9GYvTmcwkZ6E+v9vrj30EGwllmqgcDk1BcWbzkWPkML jN484cye8Som7d2GeSDFevVivOfpkY60ESOles8yue3lB8aYrZuuaiCzAzM7SiRK7mo8 SjZcqbxl5gFe0TfwAi3wf1lswZZrBJMgmnt6NSVRYrHYJ/T6PTw0X5da+I1GEkD3+cew ETpreG/ArmXSYzyH8OIWn2LizJb5T8ERr1ZWPdz3djqtLa/R1CI2NggQ5XGf7M3TpMlr 5BRg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jan.kiszka@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from thoth.sbs.de (thoth.sbs.de. [192.35.17.2]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m16si915367wmg.2.2020.06.12.11.44.18 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:44:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.2 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.35.17.2; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jan.kiszka@siemens.com designates 192.35.17.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jan.kiszka@siemens.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: from mail2.sbs.de (mail2.sbs.de [192.129.41.66]) by thoth.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05CIiImG023814 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:44:18 +0200 Received: from [167.87.11.220] ([167.87.11.220]) by mail2.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CIiIjO002853; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:44:18 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix and test wic exclude-path To: Henning Schild Cc: isar-users@googlegroups.com References: <20200406201648.26945-1-henning.schild@siemens.com> <20200610172627.09cfb239@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> <20200612065522.GP5077@yssyq.m.ilbers.de> <363edd34-2226-0909-ccee-619a7d54b834@siemens.com> <20200612201148.2dc9c146@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> <20200612201720.68790189@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> From: Jan Kiszka Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:44:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200612201720.68790189@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TUID: D/p2Icy2FRRu On 12.06.20 20:17, Henning Schild wrote: > Am Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:11:48 +0200 > schrieb "[ext] Henning Schild" : > >> Am Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:17:19 +0200 >> schrieb "[ext] Jan Kiszka" : >> >>> On 12.06.20 08:55, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote: >>>> Hello Henning, >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 05:26:27PM +0200, Henning Schild wrote: >>>> >>>>> Still having to work around that in a downstream layer. Any more >>>>> comments or questions? >>>> >>>> I'd like to look at the following issues: >>>> >>>> 1. I'd like to understand what exactly is failing when the fix is >>>> not applied. >>>> >>>> 2. The test case is failing with the fix applied. >>>> >>> >>> Before we dig too deep on details: >>> >>> The pressure to update wic to a more recent version is increasing, >>> just received another request today, so is our backlog of own >>> upstream patches missing in Isar. I would proppose starting that >>> update and then focuson testing and stabilization of the result. >> >> Agreed, we should make sure to use a recent bitbake and wic from >> upstream. But we have a horrible fork with backports right now ... > > The clear goal should be submodules or something like it. To prevent > any isar specifics and enforce upstream work. Having copies allowed us > to get into this mess. (talking about bitbake and libs here) Those > other backports should never have been merged ... i just follow along > here ... We will likely have to carry patches on top of those submodules then. I don't believe (yet) that this can be cleaner. But such things are best understood by trying it, at least a bit until it explodes. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux