From: "'Quirin Gylstorff' via isar-users" <isar-users@googlegroups.com>
To: Zhihang Wei <wzh@ilbers.de>,
isar-users@googlegroups.com, cedric.hombourger@siemens.com,
jan.kiszka@siemens.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix initrd build depends after setting IMAGE_INITRD
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 13:10:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dfb6f140-083e-4d7b-a8fd-298d5b46d234@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bea7b402-04d2-4e82-8c69-b2d7432b1ae2@ilbers.de>
Hi
On 12/9/25 13:02, Zhihang Wei wrote:
>
>
> On 12/3/25 15:45, Quirin Gylstorff wrote:
>> From: Quirin Gylstorff <quirin.gylstorff@siemens.com>
>>
>> As do_image is virtual task it is not executed, see log.taskorder.
> I'm a bit confused because do_image_tools seems also to be a virtual
> task in image.bbclass. Why this virtual task was executed?
I think do_image_tools has some implementation behind it due to wic
in my case.
>>>> 20251203-141015.078894 do_fetch (8603): log.do_fetch.8603
>> 20251203-141015.432653 do_unpack (8817): log.do_unpack.8817
>> 20251203-141016.385643 do_copy_wks_template (9626):
>> log.do_copy_wks_template.9626
>> 20251203-141018.352672 do_check_swu_partition_uuids (11629):
>> log.do_check_swu_partition_uuids.11629
>> 20251203-142714.202649 do_rootfs_install (269893):
>> log.do_rootfs_install.269893
>> 20251203-142812.346458 do_copy_boot_files (278687):
>> log.do_copy_boot_files.278687
>> 20251203-142812.347572 do_deploy_tpm2_firmware (278688):
>> log.do_deploy_tpm2_firmware.278688
>> 20251203-142812.479116 do_rootfs_postprocess (278755):
>> log.do_rootfs_postprocess.278755
>> 20251203-142813.723336 do_generate_image_uuid (280155):
>> log.do_generate_image_uuid.280155
>> 20251203-142813.833043 do_rootfs_finalize (280281):
>> log.do_rootfs_finalize.280281
>> 20251203-142813.837689 do_transform_template (280287):
>> log.do_transform_template.280287
>> 20251203-142835.289802 do_rootfs_quality_check (303158):
>> log.do_rootfs_quality_check.303158
>> 20251203-142835.458624 do_rootfs (303179): log.do_rootfs.303179
>> 20251203-142835.545966 do_image_tools (303194): log.do_image_tools.303194
>> 20251203-142835.548904 do_rootfs_wicenv (303195):
>> log.do_rootfs_wicenv.303195
>> 20251203-142835.635904 do_image_squashfs (303216):
>> log.do_image_squashfs.303216
>> 20251203-142853.614060 do_image_verity (305205):
>> log.do_image_verity.305205
>> 20251203-142916.978304 do_image_wic (309278): log.do_image_wic.309278
>> 20251203-145901.333675 do_image_wic (953): log.do_image_wic.953
>>
>> To ensure that a custom initrd is always build attach the dependency
>> to do_image_tools instead.
>>
>> This fixes a problem with the new IMAGE_INITRD variable in case of
>> a multiconfig with two custom initrds.
> Can you elaborate on this issue? Is this related with initrd image not
> being generated?
The initrd was not generated - so we have a dependency issue. I think
the main issue is the anonymous python task.
Quirin>
> Zhihang
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Quirin Gylstorff <quirin.gylstorff@siemens.com>
>> ---
>> meta/classes/image.bbclass | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/classes/image.bbclass b/meta/classes/image.bbclass
>> index b030024f..b6301e17 100644
>> --- a/meta/classes/image.bbclass
>> +++ b/meta/classes/image.bbclass
>> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ IMAGE_INITRD ?= ""
>> INITRD_DEPLOY_FILE = "${@ d.getVar('IMAGE_INITRD') or '${PN}' }-
>> ${DISTRO}-${MACHINE}-initrd.img"
>> # Make sure dependent initramfs recipe is built
>> -do_image[depends] += "${@ '${IMAGE_INITRD}:do_build' if
>> '${IMAGE_INITRD}' else '' }"
>> +do_image_tools[depends] += "${@ '${IMAGE_INITRD}:do_build' if
>> '${IMAGE_INITRD}' else '' }"
>> # Produce warning(s) if INITRD_IMAGE is used
>> python() {
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "isar-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to isar-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/isar-users/dfb6f140-083e-4d7b-a8fd-298d5b46d234%40siemens.com.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-09 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-03 14:45 'Quirin Gylstorff' via isar-users
2025-12-09 12:02 ` Zhihang Wei
2025-12-09 12:10 ` 'Quirin Gylstorff' via isar-users [this message]
2025-12-09 12:28 ` Zhihang Wei
2025-12-09 15:12 ` 'Quirin Gylstorff' via isar-users
2025-12-09 16:13 ` Zhihang Wei
2025-12-12 14:30 ` Zhihang Wei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dfb6f140-083e-4d7b-a8fd-298d5b46d234@siemens.com \
--to=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
--cc=cedric.hombourger@siemens.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=quirin.gylstorff@siemens.com \
--cc=wzh@ilbers.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox