From: "Moessbauer, Felix" <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>
To: "Schild, Henning" <henning.schild@siemens.com>
Cc: "isar-users@googlegroups.com" <isar-users@googlegroups.com>,
"Kiszka, Jan" <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
"venkata.pyla@toshiba-tsip.com" <venkata.pyla@toshiba-tsip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] make deb_add_changelog idempotent
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 10:42:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e247b03e425a09082dda00631bf5f96ccb9edd72.camel@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230109101929.6e3eb90e@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net>
On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 10:19 +0100, Henning Schild wrote:
> Am Mon, 9 Jan 2023 05:14:26 +0000
> schrieb Felix Moessbauer <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>:
>
> > Previously, the deb_add_changelog function considered an
> > auto-generated changelog as a base to add changes on top. This
> > behavior is not idempontent on subsequent invocations of the
> > function
> > (e.g. on partial rebuilds). This lead to both reproducability
> > issues,
> > as well as unclean changelog files having multiple "generated by
> > ISAR" entries.
>
> Can you provide an example of that? Like how the wrong changelog
> would
> look like and why it would be wrong.
Consider this changelog file:
[...]
reprotest (1.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* generated by Isar
-- Unknown maintainer <unknown@example.com> Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:42
+0000
reprotest (1.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* generated by Isar
-- Unknown maintainer <unknown@example.com> Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00
+0000
>
> partial rebuilds (especially when code was modified inbetween) are
> hard
> to argue in the context of reproducible builds.
>
> > This patch changes this implementation in a way to always create a
> > (possibly empty) orig changelog on the first invocation. On
> > subequent
> > invocations, the orig changelog is only considered as provided by
> > the
> > user, if it is not empty.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Felix Moessbauer <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>
> > ---
> > meta/classes/debianize.bbclass | 14 +++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/classes/debianize.bbclass
> > b/meta/classes/debianize.bbclass index d125256..34347b5 100644
> > --- a/meta/classes/debianize.bbclass
> > +++ b/meta/classes/debianize.bbclass
> > @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ MAINTAINER ??= "Unknown maintainer
> > <unknown@example.com>" deb_add_changelog() {
> > changelog_v="${CHANGELOG_V}"
> > timestamp=0
> > - if [ -f ${S}/debian/changelog ]; then
> > + # we have a changelog and that is not autogenerated
> > + # (when autogenerated, changelog.orig is empty)
> > + if [ -f ${S}/debian/changelog ] && [ -s
> > ${WORKDIR}/changelog.orig ]; then if [ ! -f
> > ${WORKDIR}/changelog.orig
>
> can that condition inside the condition still be met?
Yes, this is met when a custom changelog file is provided and we run
the deb_add_changelog function for the first time. There, no
changelog.orig exists yet.
Felix
>
> Henning
>
> > ]; then cp ${S}/debian/changelog ${WORKDIR}/changelog.orig
> > fi
> > @@ -34,10 +36,12 @@ ${PN} (${changelog_v}) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> >
> > -- ${MAINTAINER} ${date}
> > EOF
> > - if [ -f ${WORKDIR}/changelog.orig ]; then
> > - # prepend our entry to the original changelog
> > - echo >> ${S}/debian/changelog
> > - cat ${WORKDIR}/changelog.orig >>
> > ${S}/debian/changelog
> > + # ensure that we always start with the orig version of the
> > + # changelog on repeated invocations (e.g. on partial
> > rebuilds)
> > + touch ${WORKDIR}/changelog.orig
> > + # prepend our entry to the original changelog
> > + echo >> ${S}/debian/changelog
> > + cat ${WORKDIR}/changelog.orig >> ${S}/debian/changelog
> > fi
> >
> > if [ -f ${WORKDIR}/changelog ]; then
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-09 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-09 5:14 [PATCH 0/3] Fix reproducability issues in deb_add_changelog Felix Moessbauer
2023-01-09 5:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] make deb_add_changelog idempotent Felix Moessbauer
2023-01-09 9:19 ` Henning Schild
2023-01-09 10:42 ` Moessbauer, Felix [this message]
2023-01-09 5:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] deb_add_changelog: set timestamp to valid epoch Felix Moessbauer
2023-01-09 5:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] deb_add_changelog: use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH Felix Moessbauer
2023-01-09 5:34 ` Jan Kiszka
2023-01-09 9:25 ` Henning Schild
2023-01-09 10:24 ` Moessbauer, Felix
2023-01-09 10:30 ` Jan Kiszka
2023-01-09 9:28 ` [PATCH 0/3] Fix reproducability issues in deb_add_changelog Henning Schild
2023-01-09 10:33 ` Moessbauer, Felix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e247b03e425a09082dda00631bf5f96ccb9edd72.camel@siemens.com \
--to=felix.moessbauer@siemens.com \
--cc=henning.schild@siemens.com \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=venkata.pyla@toshiba-tsip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox