From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: "[ext] Henning Schild" <henning.schild@siemens.com>,
Harald Seiler <hws@denx.de>
Cc: isar-users@googlegroups.com, Claudius Heine <ch@denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] image: Run copy_boot_files after rootfs postprocessing
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 19:02:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e420e916-a8fe-ef2d-a2f7-a152e7913826@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200625184822.236ff069@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net>
On 25.06.20 18:48, [ext] Henning Schild wrote:
> Hi Harald,
>
> can you elaborate on those cases? The postprocessing is hacky, if the
> problem is coming from your layer you should probably keep this patch
> in you layer.
Basically do_generate_image_uuid from
https://lore.kernel.org/cip-dev/20200625141015.31719-4-Quirin.Gylstorff@siemens.com/T/#u,
just modeled as post-processing hook, rather than a task.
Jan
>
> Maybe you can point out an issue in isar itself, or explain how you got
> into this situation? We can then see if your change is generic enough
> for upstream. You could also provide the error-case from your layer as
> an upstream feature, if that is generic enough.
>
> Henning
>
> Am Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:33:51 +0200
> schrieb Harald Seiler <hws@denx.de>:
>
>> In some cases, postprocessing might trigger an update of the initramfs
>> which would not appear in the deployed version. Fix this by running
>> copy_boot_files only after all postprocessing completed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Harald Seiler <hws@denx.de>
>> ---
>> meta/classes/image.bbclass | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/classes/image.bbclass b/meta/classes/image.bbclass
>> index 0150f2718573..21d634a8f34f 100644
>> --- a/meta/classes/image.bbclass
>> +++ b/meta/classes/image.bbclass
>> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ do_copy_boot_files() {
>> cp -f "$dtb" "${DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE}/"
>> done
>> }
>> -addtask copy_boot_files before do_rootfs_postprocess after
>> do_rootfs_install +addtask copy_boot_files before do_rootfs after
>> do_rootfs_postprocess
>> python do_image_tools() {
>> """Virtual task"""
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-25 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-25 15:33 Harald Seiler
2020-06-25 16:48 ` Henning Schild
2020-06-25 17:02 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2020-06-25 17:24 ` Harald Seiler
2020-06-25 18:43 ` Henning Schild
2020-06-25 19:23 ` Henning Schild
2020-06-25 19:27 ` Henning Schild
2020-06-26 8:13 ` Harald Seiler
2020-06-26 8:19 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-06-26 8:26 ` Henning Schild
2020-06-26 8:44 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-06-26 9:15 ` Henning Schild
2020-06-26 7:17 ` Claudius Heine
2020-06-26 8:02 ` Harald Seiler
2020-06-26 9:12 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-06-29 9:04 ` Claudius Heine
2020-06-29 9:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-06-29 12:22 ` Harald Seiler
2020-06-29 12:41 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-06-29 12:55 ` Henning Schild
2020-06-29 13:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-07-01 8:29 ` Claudius Heine
2020-10-13 10:19 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-10-13 10:26 ` Harald Seiler
2020-10-13 10:35 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e420e916-a8fe-ef2d-a2f7-a152e7913826@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=ch@denx.de \
--cc=henning.schild@siemens.com \
--cc=hws@denx.de \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox