public inbox for isar-users@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Moessbauer, Felix" <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>
To: "Schild, Henning" <henning.schild@siemens.com>
Cc: "Schaffner, Tobias" <tobias.schaffner@siemens.com>,
	"isar-users@googlegroups.com" <isar-users@googlegroups.com>,
	"Kiszka, Jan" <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: expand-on-first-boot failure
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 03:10:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e80518a64093caf6ba24fd92fa31e0aacce4a141.camel@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221208163502.7f3fc148@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net>

On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 16:35 +0100, Henning Schild wrote:
> Am Mon, 5 Dec 2022 02:06:33 +0100
> schrieb "Moessbauer, Felix (T CED INW-CN)"
> <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>:
> 
> > On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 17:35 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > this is with current master:
> > > 
> > > Aug 07 13:25:35 iot2050-debian systemd[1]: Starting Expand last
> > > partition...
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: GPT
> > > PMBR size mismatch (5407157 != 33554431) will be corrected by
> > > write.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: The
> > > backup GPT table is not on the end of the device. This problem
> > > will
> > > be corrected by write.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > Checking that no-one is using this disk right now ... FAILED
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > This
> > > disk is currently in use - repartitioning is probably a bad idea.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > Umount
> > > all file systems, and swapoff all swap partitions on this disk.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: Use
> > > the --no-reread flag to suppress this check.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > Disk
> > > /dev/sda: 16 GiB, 17179869184 bytes, 33554432 sectors
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > Disk
> > > model: File-Stor Gadget
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > Units:
> > > sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > Sector
> > > size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: I/O
> > > size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > Disklabel type: gpt
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > Disk
> > > identifier: 69D3FE47-A859-42D9-B04E-D26BFE6121C6
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: Old
> > > situation:
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > Device     Start     End Sectors  Size Type
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > /dev/sda1   2048 5407123 5405076  2.6G Linux filesystem
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: >>>
> > > Script header accepted.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: >>>
> > > Script header accepted.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: >>>
> > > Script header accepted.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: >>>
> > > Script header accepted.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: >>>
> > > Script header accepted.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: >>>
> > > Script header accepted.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: >>>
> > > Created a new GPT disklabel (GUID: 69D3FE47-A859-42D9-B04E-
> > > D26BFE6121C6).
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > /dev/sda1: Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux filesystem'
> > > and
> > > of size 16 GiB.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:36 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > Partition #1 contains a ext4 signature.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > /dev/sda2: Done.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: New
> > > situation:
> > > Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > Disklabel type: gpt
> > > Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > Disk
> > > identifier: 69D3FE47-A859-42D9-B04E-D26BFE6121C6
> > > Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > Device     Start      End  Sectors Size Type
> > > Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > /dev/sda1   2048 33554398 33552351  16G Linux filesystem
> > > Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: The
> > > partition table has been altered.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > Calling ioctl() to re-read partition table.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: Re-
> > > reading the partition table failed.: Device or resource busy
> > > Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]: The
> > > kernel still uses the old table. The new table will be used at
> > > the
> > > next reboot or after you run partprobe(8) or partx(8).
> > > Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian expand-last-partition.sh[272]:
> > > Syncing disks.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian systemd-growfs[296]: Failed to
> > > open
> > > "/dev/block/8:1": No such file or directory
> > > Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian systemd[1]: expand-on-first-
> > > boot.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
> > > Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian systemd[1]: expand-on-first-
> > > boot.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
> > > Aug 07 13:25:37 iot2050-debian systemd[1]: Failed to start Expand
> > > last partition.
> > > 
> > > Is the downstream layer lacking something to make things work
> > > again?
> > > Or
> > > is the slow, emulated storage device triggering a bug in the new
> > > script?  
> > 
> > Hi, I recently discovered the same problem on an IoT2050.
> > I'm really asking my self if we should continue with our own
> > implementation of expand-on-first-boot. We almost always had bugs
> > in
> > this recipe which shows that this is definitely not something
> > trivial.
> > But it is still a critical part of the infrastructure.
> > 
> > IIRC the only reason for not using systemd-repart was the lack of
> > backward compatibility for Debian stretch. Why not simply split the
> > recipe into the old version for old distros and systemd-repart for
> > new
> > ones.
> 
> No it was more complex than that and there should be summary mails
> somewhere.
> 
> You can use it but it will be pretty specific and not as generic.
> 
> You need to drop some bits into fstab, wks and rootfs.
> 
> rootfs:
>   a snippet that says what you want "grow 100%" and which partition
>   "partition uuid" (the first hit ... )
> wks:
>   give your funny partition a funny part uuid and make sure it is the
>   first, maybe a label would work as well
> fstab:
>   put in the x-systemd.growfs

This is a very good summary.
I got lost in the back and forth of the discussion.

Thanks Henning!

> 
> Now you do everything with systemd and simply do not install the isar
> package. That all seems very powerful and maybe worth trying for a
> layer. (mdadm ... lvm2 ... what have you)
> 
> With repart it seems you can not put all into one nice place/package
> and can not make it generic. That is why we have what we have, you do
> not have to use it.
> 
> Henning
> 
> > Felix
> > 
> > > 
> > > Jan
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Siemens AG, Technology
> > > Competence Center Embedded Linux
> > >  
> > 
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2022-12-09  3:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-04 16:35 Jan Kiszka
2022-12-05  1:06 ` Moessbauer, Felix
2022-12-05  7:36   ` Jan Kiszka
2022-12-08 15:37     ` Henning Schild
2022-12-08 15:35   ` Henning Schild
2022-12-09  3:10     ` Moessbauer, Felix [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e80518a64093caf6ba24fd92fa31e0aacce4a141.camel@siemens.com \
    --to=felix.moessbauer@siemens.com \
    --cc=henning.schild@siemens.com \
    --cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=tobias.schaffner@siemens.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox