From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: "Maxim Yu. Osipov" <mosipov@ilbers.de>
Cc: Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>,
isar-users <isar-users@googlegroups.com>,
Cedric Hombourger <Cedric_Hombourger@mentor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] isar-bootstrap: Fix and cleanup bind mounting
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 15:24:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ecc9eb0f-3774-5206-33c5-53a25f47493b@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61a6a17c-06e0-a13b-591e-3ea8bc09632e@ilbers.de>
On 04.12.18 11:49, Maxim Yu. Osipov wrote:
> On 12/3/18 3:59 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 30.11.18 10:20, Maxim Yu. Osipov wrote:
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
>>> I've just tried this patch (on the 'next' with reverted patch d40a9ac0) and
>>> ran "fast" CI
>>>
>>> isar$mount | wc -l
>>> 34
>>>
>>> isar$./scripts/ci_build.sh -q -f
>>>
>>> CI script hung on CI stage when dpkg-base is modified
>>> causing rebuilding recipes based on dpkg-base.
>>>
>>> The mount reports less (!) mount points than before launching the script.
>>>
>>> mount | wc -l
>>> 31
>>
>> Any news on what's different on your side? Where exactly does your build hang?
>> Was your CI environment in a clean state when running this test? Before the
>> comment lots of things leaked.
>
>
> On my stretch laptop (i7-6820HQ CPU @ 2.70GHz (8 cores) with SSD) the reported
> problem is reproducible (I rerun 'ci_build.sh -q -f' several times in clean
> state) it hung and with the less mount points (the mount points before and after
> running are attached).
>
> The strange thing that I observe two bitbake processes:
>
> myo 26373 0.0 0.3 153116 29732 pts/0 Sl+ 12:31 0:01 python3
> /home/myo/work/isar/src/trunk/isar/bitbake/bin/bitbake
> multiconfig:qemuarm-stretch:isar-image-base
> multiconfig:qemuarm64-stretch:isar-image-base
> multiconfig:qemuamd64-stretch:isar-image-base
>
> myo 26379 2.5 0.6 328476 50028 ? Sl 12:31 0:40 python3
> /home/myo/work/isar/src/trunk/isar/bitbake/bin/bitbake
> multiconfig:qemuarm-stretch:isar-image-base
> multiconfig:qemuarm64-stretch:isar-image-base
> multiconfig:qemuamd64-stretch:isar-image-base
>
We run multiple bitbake sessions after each other. Maybe the first one never
terminates (get stuck), and that is also why the rm after the first session
fails. You need to stop the build there and analyse what is keeping the mount
points busy.
>
> When I turned on verbosity (called ci_build.sh without '-q' switch)
> 'scripts/ci_build -f' succeeded.
>
> Build also fails on isar-build.org
> http://isar-build.org:8080/job/isar_mosipov_next/98/console:
> it complains on
> 'rm: cannot remove
> '/workspace/build/isar_mosipov_next/98/build/tmp/work/debian-stretch-armhf/isar-bootstrap-target/rootfs/dev':
> Device or resource busy'
>
> Note that ci-build.sh on isar-build.org is also called with '-q' switch.
>
>
> Questions:
>
> 1) Did you launch ci_build with '-q' option?
>
yes
> 2) Did you inspect mount points before and after launching ci_build? Are they
> identical?
>
yes
> 3) Do you run this in docker?
>
yes, in all setups.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-04 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-29 16:29 Jan Kiszka
2018-11-29 18:39 ` Henning Schild
2018-11-30 9:20 ` Maxim Yu. Osipov
2018-11-30 9:36 ` Henning Schild
2018-11-30 9:40 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-11-30 9:38 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-11-30 10:19 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-11-30 10:51 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-12-03 12:59 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-12-03 14:37 ` Hombourger, Cedric
2018-12-04 10:49 ` Maxim Yu. Osipov
2018-12-04 14:24 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2018-12-04 15:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-12-04 15:45 ` Hombourger, Cedric
2018-12-04 16:59 ` Maxim Yu. Osipov
2018-12-04 17:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-12-04 17:31 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-12-04 15:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2018-12-07 13:45 ` Maxim Yu. Osipov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ecc9eb0f-3774-5206-33c5-53a25f47493b@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=Cedric_Hombourger@mentor.com \
--cc=henning.schild@siemens.com \
--cc=isar-users@googlegroups.com \
--cc=mosipov@ilbers.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox