From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-GM-THRID: 7055561563630993408
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb54:: with SMTP id v20mr10468568wmj.2.1644833909675;
        Mon, 14 Feb 2022 02:18:29 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: isar-users@googlegroups.com
Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3c9f:: with SMTP id bg31ls5922481wmb.1.canary-gmail;
 Mon, 14 Feb 2022 02:18:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyU4dbQ3oX3fkzONtkniCrfCd6bmbnYtEAFt5PzwW30arfeYShxvajeyxrM+4lSMx12Uz22
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f312:: with SMTP id q18mr10813050wmq.13.1644833908893;
        Mon, 14 Feb 2022 02:18:28 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1644833908; cv=none;
        d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        b=tLCIa4vZPyeMHpA1jdwe4nrqM8oHtPgLM16rKfsSv152EepVy+papNJq3FSwq0aYr/
         XL0b5uPTRMXjpQ86sbPc+PXc96XDQ7fLRsqzJJWPar7hIfNgyjoTHu+JYBLgUjSPcG/t
         +rvGyLoYXbwLUnj49cSsLUeGFxF7BIHEbgDoznrrbc2bqANT2KpLsyWWm3J2x1PDFSk5
         OdHG+4q7vjNaMouPsX1pluJV3qX5DLAt23grj6mold9XLs6Loge/TWSHX147o4YcQlcw
         3lX288/rZRsXdk4zoFmhxQsVcPa5qQS2Pqjs5YByhLNrLm0+KUKlu05X7266AQRnxl9U
         48rQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        h=content-language:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:to:subject;
        bh=8CbBJmRsMZjwZGOGP6yDPP4CpEbg9cKqYa71A+dW/pk=;
        b=CVJEqoqMh42cMNLdyweLqDwzs3Rca7CjsP4cF0V+UQKT1CE+mKTYs1Il1SPYD2JCk6
         HESpm5NuNZRVAKzdmM35QuEKxYyZPPfZjeElMecP2yHbYV6rYLP4u7Ggw+Jo+gcXTNeC
         AEiknolopfBBFYPxN10SsStajrPhFQ6I/WaPpO184GVcLuXtjJaG6CZU4E8WB6Dh/Nlw
         w7LwfKU73xG3mKmcjWRmmqhnHphoUJ44DI0vyoOrAhXCnDz5AfziInTV/kSJPWRAOWwv
         2/bbV9bcAMqsxBwA0hkLYa9mTR68412siRRaXjTSKchQA+p20sI9cMikoTfeHN6edgL5
         2pGg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; gmr-mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of amikan@ilbers.de designates 85.214.156.166 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=amikan@ilbers.de
Return-Path: <amikan@ilbers.de>
Received: from shymkent.ilbers.de (shymkent.ilbers.de. [85.214.156.166])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d14si1512418wrz.4.2022.02.14.02.18.28
        for <isar-users@googlegroups.com>
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256);
        Mon, 14 Feb 2022 02:18:28 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of amikan@ilbers.de designates 85.214.156.166 as permitted sender) client-ip=85.214.156.166;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of amikan@ilbers.de designates 85.214.156.166 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=amikan@ilbers.de
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (host-80-81-17-52.static.customer.m-online.net [80.81.17.52])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by shymkent.ilbers.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-8) with ESMTPSA id 21EAIQJW015463
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Mon, 14 Feb 2022 11:18:28 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Don't run update-initramfs with enable-fsck
To: Uladzimir Bely <ubely@ilbers.de>, isar-users@googlegroups.com
References: <20220121074218.23943-1-ubely@ilbers.de>
From: Anton Mikanovich <amikan@ilbers.de>
Message-ID: <eefd3b24-5450-e737-f9b8-eb6b30edc292@ilbers.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 13:18:26 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20220121074218.23943-1-ubely@ilbers.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on shymkent.ilbers.de
X-TUID: UDSKRIdsUJXE

21.01.2022 10:42, Uladzimir Bely wrote:
> The enable-fsck recipe installs into the system the script that sets
> 'fs_passno' fields for the partitions in fstab. After that, it calls
> 'update-initramfs -u' that takes several minutes to run.
>
> In CI this sometimes causes fails with 'run_vm' tests while there is
> no proper command prompt after expected timeout, especially if CI
> server is highly loaded.
>
> Actually, there were several targets checked. All of them had empty
> fstab in their generated initramfs images. So, 'update-initramfs -u'
> just takes much time but doesn't really change anything and may be
> omitted.
>
> Anyway, something could be overlooked during investigations, so if we
> really need initramfs update at first run, it would be nice to know
> exactly why.
>
> Uladzimir Bely (1):
>    enable-fsck: don't run update-initramfs after fstab modification
>
>   meta/recipes-support/enable-fsck/files/enable-fsck.sh | 2 --
>   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
Applied to next, thanks.